Refuting Abp. Vigano's Accusation: UN is Establishing the Antichrist's Satanic One-World Religion

By Thomas Ivan Dahlheimer

In Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano's August 31, 2021 article "Considerations on the Great Reset and the New World Order" he ignorantly and hatefully attacks world-renowned people who are respected and honored by multitudes of good-willed people around the world-with his lies and quotes of theirs taken out of context to falsely accuse them of being Satanists, whose teachings are the foundation of the United Nations' developing Satanic One-World Religion of the End-Times Antichrist.

Vigano wrote: In order to understand the esoteric roots of the thought that lies at the foundation of the United Nations, once longed for by Giuseppe Mazzini, we cannot fail to consider characters such as Albert Pike, Eliphas Levi, Helena Blavatsky, Alice Ann Bailey, or other disciples [including David Spangler] of Luciferian sects. Their writings, published since the late nineteenth century, are quite revealing.

Wikipedia: "Luciferianism is a belief structure that venerates the fundamental traits that are attributed to Lucifer. The custom, inspired by the teachings of Gnosticism, usually reveres Lucifer not as the devil, but as a savior, a guardian or instructing spirit or even the true god as opposed to [the Old Testament God] Jehovah." Gnostics believe that the New Testament God is a different God than the Old Testament God. And some Gnostics, Theosophists and New Agers believe that Lucifer is a Divine Emanation of the New Testament God, and is the Son of God.

Albert Pike (deceased Freemason), Helena Blavatsky and Alice Ann Bailey (deceased Theosophist New Agers) and David Spangler (living Theosophist New Ager) are mentioned and quoted in Vigano's article. Those quotes are presented and explained in this article. I explain them in the context that they are meant to be in, and clarify what they actually mean. None of these deceased people worshipped Satan, and neither does Spangler, as Vigano insinuates in his article.

Vigano is extremely bigoted, therefore, he believes he can use the word Lucifer in the context of his and most other Christians' definition, to mean Satan, when he knows these world-renowned people are using the term in a radically different context, where Lucifer does not mean Satan, but rather a different entity, a good entity.

Jesus proclaimed his identity with Venus the Lightbringer in Revelation 22:16, where he says “I, Jesus, am the bright and morning star.” If the translators had chosen to translate this verse using Latin just as they did with Isaiah 14:12, it would read “I, Jesus, am Lucifer.” Vigano does not equate Luciferianism with followers of Jesus Christ. The Christians who claim that Lucifer is the devil actually have no Biblical basis or authority for such a belief.

Helena Blavatsky:

An excerpt from an article presented on the United Lodges of Theosophists website reads: When we bear in mind that “The Secret Doctrine” [written by Helena Blavatsky] teaches that the Lemurian Root Race was born under the influence of Venus and received its “light and life” from the Planetary Spirit of Venus, it all becomes clearer, since Lucifer has been an accepted synonym for Venus – the bright and morning star – since long before the days of Christian theology and millennia before Lucifer was first ignorantly equated with the devil.

According to Madame Blavatsky, the Mother of the New Age, the devil has both a good side and an evil side, and Lucifer also has both a good side and an evil side. Concerning the devil (Satan), his evil side is dominant. In respect to Lucifer, his good side is dominant. Satan's good side and Lucifer's good side are the same Entity. And Lucifer's evil side and Satan's evil side are the same entity. Because Lucifer's dominant manifestation is good, he is generally identified as a good entity. And because Satan's dominant manifestation is evil, he is generally identified as an evil entity. The totality of Lucifer is equivalent to an Angel, such as a Seraphim and Cherubim. Sometimes, the term Lucifer is used when referring only to his good side, which is God, the LOGOS.

Helena Blavatsky wrote: Esoteric philosophy admits neither good nor evil per se, as existing independently in nature. The cause for both is found, as regards the Kosmos, in the necessity of contraries or contrasts, and with respect to man, in his human nature, his ignorance and passions. There is no devil or the utterly depraved, as there are no Angels absolutely perfect, though there may be spirits of Light and of Darkness; thus LUCIFER – the spirit of Intellectual Enlightenment and Freedom of Thought – is metaphorically the guiding beacon, which helps man to find his way through the rocks and sandbanks of Life, for Lucifer is the LOGOS in his highest, and the “Adversary” in his lowest aspect – both of which are reflected in our Ego.” (Vol. 2, p. 162)

Blavatsky also wrote: “It is but natural – even from the dead letter standpoint – to view Satan [referring to his good side, which is also the good side of Lucifer, the LOGOS, who is Jesus Christ], the Serpent of Genesis, as the real creator and benefactor, the Father of Spiritual mankind. For it is he who was the “Harbinger of Light,” bright radiant Lucifer, who opened the eyes of the automaton created by Jehovah, as alleged; and he who was the first to whisper: “in the day ye eat thereof ye shall be as Elohim, knowing good and evil” – can only be regarded in the light of a Savior. An “adversary” to Jehovah the “personating spirit,” he still remains in esoteric truth the ever-loving “Messenger” (the angel), the Seraphim and Cherubim [meaning an entity of good character] who both knew well, and loved still more, and who conferred on us spiritual, instead of physical immortality – the latter, a kind of static immortality that would have transformed man into an undying “Wandering Jew”.

Blavatsky often quoted Gnostics. In the Garden of Eden Jehovah, the "Old Testament God," lied. He said that man would die if he ate the fruit, but man did not die. The Serpent was telling the truth. Jehovah himself ended up agreeing that the Serpent was right. According to Christian Gnosis, when Christ came to the world, it was his second time, since the first time was in the earthly paradise. In both cases it was, actually, Lucifer, the Messenger of God the Father, the New Testament God. In both cases, the message was the same: Gnosis that disturbs, causes changes, wakes up and liberates those who listen to it. For Christian Gnostics, the Serpent is Christ, the Savior who came to this world twice.

In Vigano's article he quotes and misquotes Madame Helena Blavatsky: Quotes of Blavatsky in Vigano's article read: (1.) "Lucifer represents Life, Thought, Progress, Civilization, Liberty, Independence...and (2.) Lucifer is the Logos, the Serpent, the Savior."..... and (3.) "The Celestial Virgin thus becomes, at the same time, the Mother of Gods and Demons, because she is the ever-loving beneficent Divinity… But in antiquity and in reality the name is Lucifer. Lucifer is the divine and earthly Light, both the Holy Spirit and Satan at the same moment.”.... And the misquote reads: "It is Satan who is the god of our planet and the only god." These words are not Blavatsky's words. And she did not believe what these words state. Vigano either failed to do the appropriate research on this misquote, or he intentionally misquoted Blavatsky.

Blavatsky believed and taught that there is but ONE Infinite Divine Life which is everything and in everything and that It has no adversary or enemy, since there is nothing but That – the boundless, impersonal, omnipresent Principle of Absolute Existence Itself. She taught that evil is really imperfection, which is the automatic and inevitable byproduct of the existence of matter. Hindus also believe and teach this. Hindus refer to this belief, as belief in Brahman.

David Spangler:

Vigano wrote: If we add to this heap of infernal ramblings the words of David Spangler, the Director of the Planetary Initiative Project of the United Nations, we will realize how terrible is the threat that is hanging over all of us:

"No one will be part of the New World Order unless he carries out an act of worship to Lucifer. No one will enter the New Age unless he receives a Luciferian initiation." (Reflections on the Christ, Findhorn, 1978)

Hindus believe and teach that Brahman consists of three aspects, they are named Shiva, Vishnu and Brahma. Shiva and Vishnu are One Spiritual Entity, the Uncreated Infinite. Brahma was created and is the World Soul who manifests as the Universe. The Universe is essentially an undifferentiated mass of light. But because Brahma sinned against the Uncreated Infinite, the material universe became manifested as a less-than-divine illusion.

The Uncreated Infinite (Spirit) created/emanated Brahma (God) who manifests as the Universe, which is an essentially undifferentiated mass of light. This light and Divine consciousness permeating it is Lucifer (God). This is David Spangler's Lucifer. Once, when Jesus Christ was experiencing Himself as One with Lucifer, or One with the Divine manifestation of the Universe, He said "the only way to the Father (the Unqualified Absolute, transcendent Father beyond the universe) is through Me (the Universe)." Pierre Teilhard de Chardin (1881–1955), a world-renowned Catholic theologian said: I can only be saved by becoming one with the universe.

Albert Pike:

In a lecture in Paris on April 19, 1897, Leo Taxil announced that "his revelations about the Freemasons were fictitious," they are widely known as the Taxil Hoax. And as Taxil publicly stated: "they were created to show to the world how gullible Catholics hostile to Freemasonry were. The "quotes" presented below by Vigano in his article are the ones Wikipedia says "are frequently associated with the Taxil hoax."

Vigano wrote: Albert Pike, a friend of Mazzini and a fellow Freemason, gave an address in 1889 in France to the highest levels of Freemasonry, which was then reprinted on 19 January 1935 by the English journal The Freemason.

Two Taxil Hoax quotes presented by Vigano in his article read:

(1.) "That which we must say to the crowd is, we worship a god, but it is the god one adores without superstition […]. The Masonic religion ought to be maintained in the purity of Luciferian doctrine by all of us who are initiates of the highest degrees. If Lucifer were not God, would Adonay [sic] [the God of the Christians] whose deeds prove his cruelty, perfidy and hatred of man, barbarism and repulsion of science, would Adonay and his priest calumniate him?"

(2.) “Yes, Lucifer is God, and unfortunately Adonay is also God. For the eternal law is that there is no light without shade, no beauty without ugliness, no white without black, for the absolute can only exist as two gods: darkness being necessary to light to serve as its foil as the pedestal is necessary to the statue, and the brake to the locomotive… the doctrine of Satanism is a heresy; and the true and pure philosophical religion is the belief in Lucifer, the equal of Adonay; but Lucifer, God of Light and God of Good, is struggling for humanity against Adonay, the God of Darkness and Evil."

Vigano wrote: In another letter, Pike wrote to Mazzini:

"We will unleash the nihilists and atheists and provoke a formidable social cataclysm that will clearly demonstrate to the nations, in all its horror, the effect of absolute atheism, the origin of barbarism and bloody subversion. Then citizens everywhere, forced to defend themselves against a world minority of revolutionaries, […] will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, finally revealed to the public’s view; a manifestation that will be followed by the destruction of Christianity and also of atheism, which will be conquered and crushed at the same time! (cf. Letter of 15 August 1871 to Giuseppe Mazzini, Library of the British Museum, London).

Wikipedia: Supporters of Freemasonry assert that, when Albert Pike and other Masonic scholars spoke about the "Luciferian path," or the "energies of Lucifer," they were referring to the Morning Star, the light bearer, the search for light; the very antithesis of dark. Pike says in Morals and Dogma, "Lucifer, the Son of the Morning! Is it he who bears the Light, and with its splendors intolerable blinds feeble, sensual, or selfish Souls? Doubt it not!"

Alice Bailey:

Vigano wrote: Alice A. Bailey [disciple of Blavatsky] writes about the New Age: The achievements of science, the conquests of nations and the conquests of territory are all indicative of the method of the Age of Pisces [Vigano writes: the age of Christ], with its idealism, its militancy, and its separativity in all fields — religious, political, and economic. But the age of synthesis, of inclusivity, and understanding is upon us, and the new education of the Age of Aquarius [Vigano writes: the age of the Antichrist] must very delicately begin to penetrate the human aura.

John Lennon and Vatican II:

Vigano wrote:

If one does not understand that the ideological roots of ecumenism are intrinsically linked to Masonic Luciferian esoterism, one cannot grasp the connection that links the doctrinal deviations of Vatican II to the plan of the New World Order. The revolution of 1968 was a sad example of those pacifist and ecumenist ambitions, in which the “Age of Aquarius” was celebrated by the musical Hair (1969) and then by John Lennon with Imagine (1971).

Archbishop Vigano presented lyrics from John Lennon's song Imagine in his article. Vigano also stated in his article that: This manifesto of Masonic nihilism can be considered the hymn of globalism and the new universal religion: it is no coincidence that it was used as the theme song for the 2012 Olympic Games in London, and more recently for those in Tokyo.

The former Beatles band, of which John Lennon was a member, honored Paramahansa Yogananda and his line of Gurus. Their pictures are on the cover of a popular Beatles album, Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band. The Oxford Research Encyclopedia states that in the late 1960s Yogananda's book "Autobiography of a Yogi" was widely regarded as the "hippie Bible." Yogananda has been called the father of yoga and meditation in the West. His Autobiography helped spark and inspire a spiritual revolution across the world. Yogananda teachings will, I believe, be very valuable in respect to the United Nations mission to establish the coming One-World Religion.

Pierre Teilhard de Chardin:

Vigano includes Pierre Teilhard de Chardin (1881–1955) in his article. Chardin was a world-renowned French Catholic priest, scientist, theologian and philosopher, who today is, as stated by Vigano (1.) a celebrated theologian who considered the United Nations as the progressivist institutional incarnation of his philosophy, and (2.) Chardin expressed his hope that "a general convergence of religions on a universal Christ who fulfills them all…seems to me to be the only possible conversion of the world, and the only form in which a religion of the future can be conceived,” and (3.) Chardin stated that he wanted this new universal religion to “reduce the gap between pantheism and Christianity" by drawing out "the pantheistic aspect of Christianity.” Vigano wrote that "the pachamama and the attribution of Marian connotations to Mother Earth turns these concepts of Chardin into a disturbing reality.

Vigano also mentioned Robert Muller in his article, who in his lifetime was a high ranking UN office and a world government theorist. Vigano also wrote that Muller was a disciple of Alice A. Bailey. Vigano stated that Chardin influenced a high ranking UN companion, "who in turn inspired his colleagues, and they in turn initiated a rich process of global and long-term thought within the United Nations, which has affected many nations and people all over the world." In addition, Vigano wrote that Muller stated he was "profoundly influenced by Teilhard.”

In Vigano's paragraph about Chardin he associates Chardin with Alice Bailey and Helena Blavatsky, "a declared Luciferian." Here Vigano tries to fool his readers, as elsewhere in his article, to believe the words "declared Luciferian" mean declared Satanist. The United Nations will, I believe, establish the coming One World Religion, however, it will not be a Satanic religion as Vigano claims, but a world-unifying holy religion, based on truth and righteousness.

 

Right wing cleric nutjob calls New Age nutjobs Satanists. So what else is new? Further evidence that the inmates are taking over the asylum. Vigano is obviously going by his Church's longstanding but questionable identification of Lucifer with Satan. Satan, the Devil, and Lucifer: are they one and the same? - The Outlaw Bible Student Vigano seems to be in the grip of QAnon, the pro-Trump conspiracy theory disseminator cult, which is prima facie evidence of insanity. He is a man born centuries behind his time, who would have been in hog heaven during the Inquisition. 'A global conspiracy against God and humanity': Controversial Catholic archbishop pushes QAnon themes in letter to Trump He's pissed at the Pope and a bit unhinged for not getting to be a cardinal! Who is Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano?