Questions about going barefoot prove we live in a police state

Do I have to wear shoes ? Is it legal to be barefoot ?

Something is wrong when people even ask these questions. Enough people asked to trigger Google into suggesting it !!

Is it legal to be barefoot or can I be kidnapped at gunpoint by the government (arrested) or extorted: forced to pay a fine with the threat of kidnapping at gunpoint to back it up ?

That is what they are really asking.

 

It's a shame people would question or be suspicious of something that doesn't harm others, feels good, and is healthy.

 

Most of the crap people get arrested for has nothing to do with harming others.


The Numbers in Perspective:

America now houses roughly the same number people with criminal records as it does four-year college graduates.

Nearly half of black males and almost 40 percent of white males are arrested by the age 23.

If all arrested Americans were a nation, they would be the world’s 18th largest. Larger than Canada. Larger than France. More than three times the size of Australia.

The number of Americans with criminal records today is larger than the entire U.S. population in 1900.

Holding hands, Americans with arrest records could circle the earth three times.

 

It's insane!

 

Most of the crap people get arrested for has nothing to do with going barefeet in public neither.
I also suspect most serious attempts to remove a barefooter or tell them they can't go barefeet somewhere is not in public like on the streets, but in restaurants, shops, supermarkets, etc. Which is the owner's full right of course.

 

please...google suggestions are not a reflection of society...it is a slice of a slice of society...minute....just means some people arent as smart as y'all is all......we get it bothers you that the entire world doesn't do what you radicals want us to do...intelligent people all know it is legal to doff the shoes...we just dont want to...i'll switch when one of you climbs a mountain barefoot...get back to me

 

define ''harm'' because that is a blatant mistruth.....most crime does harm someone.....not to mention people need protection from their own demons sometimes

 

a ticket for barefooting is not a penalty for a crime...it is a fine for a bylaw infraction...big difference...he said while wearing his new Christmas boots

 

it's proof that we live in a police state when people have to ask google if you're allowed to hunt furries.

 

Indeed Undies. Another clear indication is when you see people ask if you can legally own foxes.

 

I used a VPN that looks like it landed me someplace in Russia and got that.

 

So... I caught some foxes. Can I keep them? Should I buy some footwear?

 

number 4 makes sense and maybe the last one too

 

I'm just surprised more people weren't arrested for giving toys and clothes to the needy on Christmas. It seems like it should always be legal to help others in need, but they're actually kind of cracking down on it. Why?

 

Christian charity is now a crime in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. A 90-year-old World War II veteran and two pastors have been arrested and threatened with jail for sharing food with the homeless in a city park. “One of the police officers said, ‘Drop that plate right now,’ as if I were carrying a weapon,” Arnold Abbott told TV station WPLG. “It’s man’s inhumanity to man is all it is.”

https://www.offthegridnews.com/curr...-for-feeding-homeless-faces-2-months-in-jail/

Why ??

I don't know what the heck is wrong with authoritarian government types, its like a mental disorder they got.

 

I wonder if it's organized or just like, fascist in nature to try and eliminate people's regard for other human beings.

 

How it works...



In a 1962 letter, as a last-ditch effort for clemency, Holocaust organizer Adolf Eichmann wrote that he and other low-level officers were “forced to serve as mere instruments,” shifting the responsibility for the deaths of millions of Jews to his superiors. The “just following orders” defense, made famous in the post-WWII Nuremberg trials, featured heavily in Eichmann’s court hearings.

But that same year Stanley Milgram, a Yale University psychologist, conducted a series of famous experiments that tested whether “ordinary” folks would inflict harm on another person after following orders from an authoritative figure. Shockingly, the results suggested any human was capable of a heart of darkness.

Milgram’s research tackled whether a person could be coerced into behaving heinously, but new research released Thursday offers one explanation as to why.

“In particular, acting under orders caused participants to perceive a distance from outcomes that they themselves caused,” said study co-author Patrick Haggard, a cognitive neuroscientist at University College London, in an email.

In other words, people actually feel disconnected from their actions when they comply with orders, even though they’re the ones committing the act.

Read more here How the Nazi's defense of 'just following orders' plays out in the mind

 

They're following orders, but who is at the top? I can't comprehend the reasoning behind not being allowed to help the needy. My paranoia is like, are they trying to make people less empathetic? Does whoever is at the top realize that that is the effect their laws have? Or are they, like, trying to (stupidly) discourage homelessness? I don't get it.