protesters vs homeless

Discussion in 'Occupy Movement' started by dreamcloud, Mar 14, 2012.

  1. dreamcloud

    dreamcloud Member

    Messages:
    46
    Likes Received:
    0
    In several downtown areas there the occupy movement set up camp and got run out are hundreds of homeless in tents, etc. Seems to be to be the same things, people living in a community on the street. But if you speak your mind and stand up for a cause, you get arrested. The homeless sleep on the streets live on the streets for months and years, and that ok.

    Part of the protest is social justice. Standing up for a cause BAD. Homeless on the street GOOD.

    I thought we should combine the two.
     
  2. Tyrsonswood

    Tyrsonswood Senior Moment Lifetime Supporter

    Messages:
    34,216
    Likes Received:
    26,332
    Not to confuse the issue, but a lot of places are getting rid of their homeless population too, by just running them out and bulldozing their camp... It just doesn't make the national news much because nobody cares... Sad.
     
  3. desert-rat

    desert-rat Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,452
    Likes Received:
    87
    Most of the occupiers can make bail , pay the court fine , ect If they drug all the homeless off to jail they would haft to feed them . desert rat
     
  4. Meliai

    Meliai Members

    Messages:
    867
    Likes Received:
    3
    homeless people can't sleep on the streets in my town. You never see them. I don't know where they go but I know the police run them away if they try to sleep in a public place.
     
  5. dreamcloud

    dreamcloud Member

    Messages:
    46
    Likes Received:
    0
    we should occupy the home less areas and draw attention to their plight
     
  6. Aerianne

    Aerianne Lifetime Supporter Lifetime Supporter

    Messages:
    37,095
    Likes Received:
    17,185
    That's just what Occupy Atlanta did. They were allowed to stay at the local homeless shelter and worked with the shelter, fighting to keep it open as the city tried to close it.

    According to this article, the latest news I can find, the city is going to close that shelter in a few months.

    http://www.ajc.com/news/atlanta/judge-orders-midtown-homeless-1330322.html
     
  7. spexxx

    spexxx Member

    Messages:
    995
    Likes Received:
    5
    Time to run to the forest.
     
  8. Aerianne

    Aerianne Lifetime Supporter Lifetime Supporter

    Messages:
    37,095
    Likes Received:
    17,185
    I'm sure "they" would love for us to just quietly slip off into the forests.
     
  9. drumminmama

    drumminmama Super Moderator Super Moderator

    Messages:
    17,774
    Likes Received:
    1,655
    That doesn't work either. Forest feddies are in the Gatherings each year. Why would that change?
     
  10. tikoo

    tikoo Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,978
    Likes Received:
    488
    Actually , things with the feds did change for the 2011 WA Gathering . there were no daily armed patrols within the camp . one day i observed 3 female feds of the nature resource sort on a walk-about ... they were having some sort of intense discussion and one of them just started weeping .

    mostly though , the women of the gathering were quite relaxed since they were not being harrassed about booby regulations in the national forest .

    change is good
    unto happy hobos
     
  11. FlipFish

    FlipFish Member

    Messages:
    69
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yep, they got rid of a bunch of the camps in our city too. Of course they offer no alternatives.
     
  12. tikoo

    tikoo Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,978
    Likes Received:
    488
    the alternative offered is this : all people shall become
    perfectly socialized .

    the urbanites are stressed
     
  13. MeowKat

    MeowKat Member

    Messages:
    82
    Likes Received:
    0
    Besides the fact that many OWS'ers are homeless, trust that a gathering of 100s of homeless individuals in the same public location would result in just as much of a police presence as OWS.
     
  14. hickey

    hickey Member

    Messages:
    68
    Likes Received:
    2
    The Bonus Army was the assemblage of some 43,000 marchers—17,000 World War I veterans, their families, and affiliated groups—who gathered in Washington, D.C., in the spring and summer of 1932 to demand immediate cash-payment redemption of their service certificates. These certificates were promises of payment by the Federal Government.

    They set up camp on the National Mall.

    The Attorney General ordered the protesters removed from all government property. Washington police met with resistance. President Herbert Hoover then ordered the army to clear the veterans' campsite. Army Chief of Staff General Douglas MacArthur commanded the infantry and cavalry supported by six tanks. The Bonus Army marchers with their wives and children were driven out, and their shelters and belongings burned.
     
  15. hickey

    hickey Member

    Messages:
    68
    Likes Received:
    2
    Note that public location, or public property, is deemed 'government property'. The justification for removing 'occupiers', the same today as then.

    "Ownership, be it individual or collective, is an illusion. Occupy your own mind first, then be Anonymous".
     
  16. learn2see

    learn2see Member

    Messages:
    473
    Likes Received:
    3
    So many things people should stop and think about in thier day to day but choose to stay oblivious.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice