Discussion in 'Random Thoughts' started by cerridwen, Jun 3, 2004.
Can you see the baby in this picture? Take a good look....
yah, i saw the baby right away. pretty damn cool.
i see it.
I thought it was pretty clever... It took me a while to find it though...
I do not see a baby, but I do see two adults.
Does anyone else see them?
naturally the two adults are there.
you have to let your eyes rest a little to see the baby - the shore make its back, the tree outline its legs, and the top left corner, where the branches are, outline the baby's head.
Cer, thou have fucketh my mind here for a sec.
I'm so happy that tonight I give you permission to masturbate. Go ahead, enjoy, it won't be in your file. I promiseth you.
Firstly, God, ew. You're such a complete perve, I wish that Skip would just ban you. Secondly, I don't need to masturbate, I've a very healthy sex life. Thirdly, just... ew. You're so odd.
Waddya meaneth I'm a perv?
Odd? Yes. To your human eyes. The word you probably wanted and didn't find was "divine".
Wow that's awesome, where was that picture taken?
The baby is the picture. (Spoiler) lol
COOL PIC. i have seen that before.
dont take God so seriously. it's the day of humor. and his day doeth not equal our day
i rather enjoy god. if you dislike him, put him on ignore.
Nice pic, Cer! I recieved an e-mail once with a bunch of pics that are these illusions to the eye and that pic you posted was one of them. Have you ever seen the one about the bridge?
"Grilled cheese sandwiches will save the world!"
whoa, that's so cool!
I haven't seen that one I don't think.... if you still have it, can you post it here?
I looked at that photograph for hours, but I could not locate a baby in the tree.
Is it in the lower or upper part of the tree and is it more to the left or to the right?
i didn't like the bias towards heterosexuality in that a man and woman are together in the picture...why not two men or two women???
That's not a baby, that's a fetus. [/anal]
Separate names with a comma.