Perception or Interpretation

I have posted a few articles that upset many..(raising kids as nudists...20 cents a peep etc.) and i was called al sorts of things,yet,they are all based ön real incidents!Now i just wandered,where lies the offence,in the perception...or the interpretation of said posts.HOW is it percieved,moreover,why is it percieved as offensive?Where lies this deep root of offence?Is something percieved offensive because the Establishment deems it offensive,or does it quicken fear and horror?IF THIS IS THE CASE....then why?PERHAPS,it tickels deep forbidden fantacies.What makes the nudity of a child and its enjoying it , and others appreciating it, so forbidden?Could it go back to the time i lost my innoscence of childhood,or me fleeing it...perhaps,even loathing it in the child,but if not the latter,then what causes the offense? PERHAPS, its the fact that the ofèncee,thought on it,but never confronted it...or perhaps,guilt for indulging in such secret thoughts,and now having it exposed...or perhaps,it is the genitals association with sex,and the offencees inability to seperate the natural nudity from the sexual nudity,or the non acceptance of sexuality as normal...is perception then...subjective...and to close to self? INTERPRETATION: Is therd a difference,can it be seperated from the subjective?Most deffinately!INTERSETATION is superficial...nude is being naked...period!It is what meets the eye,and searches for the deeper meaning and the objective...thex are naked,because they are nudists...erections are erections,and thats all it is...perceptions places me in the catalist position , i.e. What can i do,and should do with the erection,and places the personal in the dominant feature.INTERSETATIÖn speaks to logic and obvious,not the personel and subjective,intersetation accepts as is,and what is logic,not emotional

 

Maybe it has something to do with distinguishing a person as someone you love and care for vs. someone to be used for your own personal enjoyment.

What you're suggesting is that we raise a cold, dead society with no empathy. People take offense to that, because most people want to be loved.

 

I have been called all types of things since I posted a few articles in the forums,verry upsetting to a few people.And this brought the question to mind,what is the problem,is it with perception or interpretation.It mostly went about the way I raised my son as a nudist,and the occasional experiences that evolved around it.I was called pedophile...sick...and all the rest....What was the perception...more over...what then is the perception of those articles I wrote....or...rather...WHAT IS PERCEPTION?
Perception is based on the way you deal entirely with it...But why do people get aggitated and upset on things that are reported as reality?What do these postings stir in the people...? Perhaps when it comes to the perception of things,it adresses perhaps deep inner fantacies and hidden secretive thoughts...perhaps the issues adressed are things that are deep within the offended person that he or she dare not speak about,and are to fearfull to speak about,as they may interpret it as unusual...or as something that they themselve cherish as to sacred,or even desire...perhaps a sense of feeling robbed in a way,meaning that that specific deep thought that they cherished in the vault of thought has been crudely ripped out.You see,perception is verry personal...its very subjective,in hinges on the fact of hopefull personal experience,but secret at all costs....Perception is the the way of mentally partacking in any thing,and the personal bennifit that coul jump from it!
Perception is based on your own personal feeling on something,and then the fear oif having it exposed in the open...perception is very close at home...that which touches me,but that I will not speak of...perhaps...fantacies with hidden agendas?
When I speak of my naked son and the things he did and does,and that I do not become judgemental about it,offends other people perhaps...due to their own insecurities...!Perhaps it even adresses something in the past that they could have experienced and either approved of or rejected,because it was not dictated by the Establishments norm.This brings up another question.....who dictates the norms of perception,and whar are the motives that become highlighted?Perception pivots on own deep inner feelings...desires,and personal involvement,or the desire to get involved.Perception adresses my own comfort zone,stripped of reality...

What then is interpretation?
Perhaps interpretation is not so very personal,and is stripped from all subjective involvement...Lets interpret the meaning of nudity....
When I say Nudity...what comes to mind...it is the exposure of the genitals....not the chest...or feet,but the genitals....it means the absence of all clothes...wheras perception goes deeper...it associates the nudity as ...arrousable...?Forbidden....?Secret to their own desires....Bring in a naked child,then the perception becomes...SEXUAL...but interpretation says...so what...its a child and an adult,together,and clothes are absent.Interpretation says,nude is nude,and an erection is an erection...its supposed to happen...its a penis....Perception goes further,and allighns it with actions,and reads into the situation,,,THAT WHICH THE PERSON WOULD DO IN THAT SET UP,it becomes personal!The person places him/hersself directly into the situation by way of deep seated fantacies....Interpretation says....there is nothing to it....naked is naked...whether adult or minor,and thats all it is!
Interpretation sees the positive side of the situation....its a man and his son being naked,and bonding with a common intrest...BEING NAKED,because they prefer to be thus.Interpretation becomes perception,once you place hidde agendas and fantacies to it.Perception sources from emotional experience,whereas interpretation sources from facts.Perception is personal...interpretation is publick.
If one looks at the naked Amazon indians and their children,equally naked,and the son lying on the fathers stomach,interpretation sees it as family dynamics and culture,because they are a very close community,whereas perception sees it as....Naked male....naked boy....genital contact...hence...there must be sexual energy.....
Why?
Because the percepting person places him/herself in the situation,and their thoughts and feelings,secret into the same situation...thus...it reveals the real sickness of that mind...Lets say that same indian and child are photographed again on top of each other,both erectile,perception sees it as SEX...and interpretation...?
The latter sees that as...a)two naked people ...b)both erections...so what,and then goes further...it reads the headings,and acertains the time sphere and time of day,and interprets it as normal.Perceptions goes mad...it sees sexual acts,FEEDING of their own INHIBITIONS and desires to be the same,but very active and the catalist of that situation,and sees what bennefit it could have gained itself from it!Orgasm...ejaculation...pedophillia....Why?Because the establishment reared them thus....Interpr

 

Thanx for the responce .Once again,it comes down to perception.The persön desires love..and acceptance,and the reason is,that that person lacks that truth.That person belogs to a family,and is loved,has friends,hence...is loved,thats the interpretation and the logic truth,but perception says,they FEEL unloved. EMPATHY falls directly in with interpretation..." I understand you belong to a pier group,and in this group,you are accepted ", SYMPATHY falls into perception, " I pitty you,thus shall i tollerate you".

 

I don't understand why people are getting irate if you're just promoting nudity and not child sexuality. It comes down to who the child actually is as a person, and exposure to sex at a young age can give them complexes later in life if what they were exposed to doesn't mesh with who they are as an adult.

I can see where you're coming from, though, I think. To treat sexuality as though you are doing something "naughty" is definitely delusional. The perception that it is something rebellious and wild, when it's really just simple, causes a lot of strife amongst people. To see your parents nude from a young age rather than clothed might stiffen the idea that, "Oh, I'm secretly this deviant that nobody understands." Blah.

But yeah, I think hostility is the source of the problem rather than the solution.