Peeing in public

A while back, at a picnic at a lake a young girl had gone a few yards off to the side to squat and pee in the bushes. The porta-pottys were all full and she wasn't shy about it. An old guy chewed her out for it. Granted it wasn't the most hygienic but guys do it all the time. But some people are offended when a girl does it. Why.
Is it offensive to watch someone pee? Forget hygiene for this question. More specifically, are you ok with seeing a girl pee?

 

Big up to girls who will squat n piss!! i see a few girls at big festivals doing it cos the toilet queues are ridiculous.

 

As a bloke I am fortunate to have a handy willy to wet away the blues - though I do sympathise with the girls - for there is little option other than to do so.
I reckon as long as its not in the middle of the street and displayed in any lewd manner - it' is an act of nature. Whilst hearing an old mans outrage may embarrass - smile, and move on for it's not like hurting anyone.
BTW Lads wouldn't care

 

If you don't expose your genitals to anyone and the urine isn't going to run off and come in contact with anything it shouldn't, I don't see a problem.

 

As a nudist, I don't see what is wrong with seeing your genitals. It's all just nature

 

was it a nudist picnic?

 

I think it's hot when a girl pees in public

 

good question

 

ya..if it was a nudist picnic i see no problem


but if it was a regular picnic i think it would be kind of gross and inappropriate for a young girl to pee where an old man would be watching (or anyone for that matter) ..it seems kinda creepy too..

 

I don't see the biggie on it. Would it have been different if it'd been a textile male going out in the woods? Maybe the guy just had a bad day. Was it a nudist event? It sure couldn't have offended him from a body standpoint I wouldn't think if he was a nudist too.

 

I'm interested to know too, if it was a nudist environment; if that being the case I don't have a problem with it. There are certain social mores that are followed in the case of a picnic of people who are not nudists, where such behaviour could be viewed very condescendingly. Otherwise, as a nudist and one among many in the outdoors, I can't see anything about it to get off-side over.

 

There's a difference between being nude and taking a walk, smoking a cigarette, having sex, and passing a bowel movement that could fill the Grand Canyon. Not all of those things should be performed in front of all people.

 

Only if it was in my house on the floor or something but if someone's gotta go they should go...just watch out for my shoes!

 

Agreed.

 

In most areas of the United States that are not designated as privately owned nude beaches or resorts, it is illegal to bare your genitals in public, including breasts for women. I don't make the laws, I just know some of them. It is also illegal to get drunk then drive. I don't think anyone except a judge has the right to interpret laws, so basically citizens are supposed to follow the law. In this case, if a male or female gets caught exposing their genitals in public, for whatever reason, they are written a ticket for indecent exposure and put on the sex offenders list. Anyone can look up their neighborhood on the sex offenders list to see who is on it.

Funny how the Native American Indians were completely natural living in nature, yet they still wore loin cloths. I wonder why that is?

 

I used to date a girl that when she got drunk enough she would just find a spot (if non available) and squat while I watched for other people...

Hey, if guys can do it...Then so should girls...

 

Wow!

I guess there is a big difference between someone who does have a quick pee in the bushes beside a secluded hiking trail and a sex offender! I wonder how you can stand reading and posting on a nudist forum if you think in such correlations.

To get back on topic: I think it's pretty natural and useful to pee outside, as long as you do it in adequate settings. To pick up the examples, i would do on a hike with friends (not just on the trail, but out of the way), but not on my friends' garden party or on the parking of the next shopping centre. I've also done on festivals where the johns where both overcrowded as messy. I guess it's not a big deal as no one feels bothered. Hey, it's all natural!

 

Actually I normally just click on the "New Posts" button and read and respond to topics that interest me. I live in Michigan, going into winter, so I doubt I will actually practice any nudist living for a while now. There is a nudist resort nearby where it is legal to walk around naked. I visited there several times but have kind of grown out of it. The question was asked whether it was apropriate to pee in public, and my answer is in most places it is not even legal to bare your genitals in public so it would not be apropriate in my opinion. I hope this forum is not just for people who think alike, but also has open minded people in it.

You never really answered my question as to why the Indians wore loin cloths.

 

Ok. So we have just two different opinions. Maybe your’s is more obedient, mine is more horse sense based. But who cares?

I guess you’re talking about Native Americans. Well, not the traditional clothing of all tribes was the loin cloth. The northern tribes even had leggings and shirts (but went barefoot even in winter). But on the other hand, most tribes of South American Natives often did go nude in daily life or did only wear a waist lace (mainly to fix the penis upwards to prevent uncomforting while running). But it’s hard to give a short overview, as there was not one single culture, but a wide spread of cultural heterogeneity, also in clothing culture. You may have heard about the “400 Nations” of the North American Natives.

Ok, but to answer your question about the benefit of the loin cloth (btw. also the traditional clothing of working people in certain middle east regions about two thousand years ago – so it’s most likely Jesus wore this too ;-) ):

The usual summer dress of most tribes of Native Americans of North America was indeed a little loin cloth made of deerskin. While children usually did go naked, the grown up men did began to wear this item passing their initiation. So first it was a sign of social statues, to tell that someone passed through the initiation rite and now is a man. Secondly, the loin cloth was a minimal protection for the valuable genitals, mainly from sun and from scratches by shrubs etc. (remember, the Native Americans were walking / running people before the Spain did bring the horse there). Afaik the loin cloth was not worn for reasons of shame or something like this.

Of course I’m not a specialist in Native American’s clothing, but these are the things I remember from reading a pretty dozen of books during a certain time of my youth. Probably there will be some who can tell better, maybe even some native ones.

 

I agree with you, but unfortunately, there are some American judges and law enforcement people who see no difference at all. They have less tolerance for such things now than ten years ago.

There was even one native tribe in Peru that considered it 100% okay to have sex in public. Unfortunately, they were also cannibals, so the government eventually had to take action to disband the tribe.

The funny part of this (true) story is that one European observer commented that, even though they could all easily compare sexual techniques with those of their peers, none of them seemed to be particularly talented! :rofl: Of course, we don't know what the observer's standards were.