Someone recently said online the only way to have a pig for dinner, is to have him as your dinner guest. But I pointed out to them that a pig will eat pork. But I don't know if it knows what it is. They showed a pet pig do that on TV in the early 80's. And he was purring with contentment as he did. Because it tasted so good. Now, with a pig, you'd be talking about necrophagy, not true cannibalism, when that happens. And they are not the same. Hunting and killing humans for sport or food is always wrong. But some think necrophagy is a beautiful funerary practice. And eating an animal after someone else killed it? That sounds more to me like the moral dilemma of blood money, like with Judas in Matthew 27:6-8. That money is always tainted with the sin originally associated with it. But eating meat someone else killed inhumanely, here. Is that "blood money". Or would that make you an accessory after the fact? Or before the fact? And then there is the legal and moral concept of acquiescence. (Which just says you should have gotten more involved in what someone else was doing. Because you were coincidentally in the room with them. Or something stupid like that.) It all gets very complicated morally.
