me & my sister were discussing today how some names you can only picture adults having...seriously, i cant imagine how someone could name a baby something like bob or jay...it just doesnt seem like a babies name. am i making sense here?
Makes pefect sense. Most of them probably start off as roberts, bobbies, jasons, an jacobs. I don't think anybody calls their 4 year old bob.
maybe those aren't modern baby names, but they always go in cycles... i guess now it would be dakota , candalicious jr etc bob is robert, that won't go away
er not exactly. what not making sense is the way the culture that comes from, that likely surrounds most of us, thinks of our younger selves, and the other selves we give physical forms so they can walk arround like us in. the mind functions from sometime between conception and birth until, in death, all measurable physiological brain activity ceases. awairness may begin if it has a begining and end if it has an end, much sooner and later. awairness to itself is awairness, whatever external circumstance or acumlated data or shortage thereof. what you are saying, yes i am awaire of, but i am also awair of the roll of cultural perspectives in such feelings. from my own perspective it makes no sense that two people should have similar (to each other) sounding names, let alone similar sounding names premeditatedly choosen for them. =^^= .../\...
I Always Remember the Day of Browsing Through a Book Store Window... And the Author of One Book was...Fanny Trollope... Heh... But Fanny is From Frances...Which Reminds me of Hindleys Wife in Wuthering Heights...
Theres no young ladies named Lois Gladys Martha ethel edna Faye Gretchen gertrude but i cant think of no old men name. theyre all john and bob and george
