NWO, more "sinister sites"

Discussion in 'Conspiracy' started by purple_sky, Mar 25, 2012.

  1. purple_sky

    purple_sky Member

    Messages:
    49
    Likes Received:
    1
  2. jaredfelix

    jaredfelix Namaste ॐ

    Messages:
    5,266
    Likes Received:
    30
  3. purple_sky

    purple_sky Member

    Messages:
    49
    Likes Received:
    1
    i am reading the project blue beam thing, it is interesting. that would not be easy/possible to anticipate
     
  4. purple_sky

    purple_sky Member

    Messages:
    49
    Likes Received:
    1
    i finally read the whole thing, about blue beam
     
  5. jaredfelix

    jaredfelix Namaste ॐ

    Messages:
    5,266
    Likes Received:
    30
    its funny because they have technology MUCH more sophisticated then blue beam and HAARP, the collection of cell satellites in orbit pretty much cover the entire earth and its said they can beam signals to any individual, controlling masses remotely by puttting frequencies/thoughts in our heads, and also reading our minds, how crazy is that!!

    All IMHO!! :D
     
  6. PsychonautMIA

    PsychonautMIA Chimps gonna chimp

    Messages:
    1,146
    Likes Received:
    2
    They probably are 30 years ahead of us regarding technology but to say "they can beam signals to any individual, controlling masses remotely by putting frequencies/thoughts in our heads, and also reading our minds" sheesh sounds like alex jones got to you lol. Don't forget to wear your tin hat; disregard the NWO.

    It's called the law of attraction the more you give it importance the more power they have.
     
  7. jaredfelix

    jaredfelix Namaste ॐ

    Messages:
    5,266
    Likes Received:
    30
    sorry alex jones is a fool, and no theyre more like thousands of years technologically advanced...
     
  8. jmt

    jmt Ezekiel 25:17

    Messages:
    7,937
    Likes Received:
    22
    No technology can read our thoughts....
     
  9. Tyrsonswood

    Tyrsonswood Senior Moment Lifetime Supporter

    Messages:
    34,216
    Likes Received:
    26,340
    They're still working on that...
     
  10. jmt

    jmt Ezekiel 25:17

    Messages:
    7,937
    Likes Received:
    22
    I believe that too but I feel that thinking starts with a person having a soul. And technology cant manipulate that what is not physical. I do believe that technology with radio frequency can alter a persons capabilty to think straight but to know what we are thinking I doubt....
     
  11. jaredfelix

    jaredfelix Namaste ॐ

    Messages:
    5,266
    Likes Received:
    30
    yes theyre working on it in cahoots with cell companies...
    4g; 5g coming. its all about the frequencies. our minds put them out... they could use computers to decipher everyones thoughts and see trends. they already have this technology.
     
  12. NoxiousGas

    NoxiousGas Old Fart

    Messages:
    8,382
    Likes Received:
    2,389
    Prove it
     
  13. jaredfelix

    jaredfelix Namaste ॐ

    Messages:
    5,266
    Likes Received:
    30
    do you deny me?
     
  14. Fitch3k

    Fitch3k Member

    Messages:
    86
    Likes Received:
    0
    they can tell a personailty type from a brain scan based on what parts of the brain are developed. the tech jaredfelix is talking about doesn't seem far fetched for this century althoug I doubt it's like "he is thinking the number 4".
     
  15. NoxiousGas

    NoxiousGas Old Fart

    Messages:
    8,382
    Likes Received:
    2,389
    Being able to tell what areas of the brain are active based on electrical activity or blood flow is a hell of a lot different than "reading someone's mind"
     
  16. jaredfelix

    jaredfelix Namaste ॐ

    Messages:
    5,266
    Likes Received:
    30
    every thought has a specific frequency dude. i call that mind reading
     
  17. NoxiousGas

    NoxiousGas Old Fart

    Messages:
    8,382
    Likes Received:
    2,389
    Prove it.
    You say a lot of crap like this yet never can provide any REAL SCIENCE to support it.
    So....
    PROVE IT or at the very least provide a link to the research that proves it, but it has to be scholarly research that stands up to the same criteria as any real scientific research does.

    1) can't be based on a insignificant sample base
    2) has to be published and peer reviewed
    3) has to be reproducible by others and they should be able to achieve the same results.
     
  18. jaredfelix

    jaredfelix Namaste ॐ

    Messages:
    5,266
    Likes Received:
    30
    uh there is real science.... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qf0t4qIVWF4&feature=results_main&playnext=1&list=PL585506328E1E8B60"]Resonance Phenomena in 2D on a Plane - YouTube
     
  19. NoxiousGas

    NoxiousGas Old Fart

    Messages:
    8,382
    Likes Received:
    2,389
    Still waiting for to provide something more substantial than your opinion, considering you present this shit as fact.

    Again, please provide some type of proof or documentation that supports this.

    What the fuck does different SOUND frequencies have to do with any of this and specifically your claims????

    Sorry that video does not constitute scientific proof of your claims.


    Seriously now, your not really this fucking stupid are you?
     
  20. midgardsun

    midgardsun Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,999
    Likes Received:
    5
    They can only read active thoughts. They cannot read parts of the brain/memory which are not active at the moment.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice