http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/a-long-list-of-sex-acts-just-got-banned-in-uk-porn-9897174.html This upsets me because I have a love of human freedom.
Personally I can do without the fisting but I don't agree with any of this. The whole argument of what is nice sex and what isn't is completely garbage and interpreted by the individual. I remember arguing with a school teach that the Romeo & Juliette perception of "love" was a complete crock of shit and failed to produce any homework assignment on this topic and argued with the teacher during oral presentation that someone in a BDSM relationship have just as much "love" as anyone else. I got 17/20 for that speech and didn't do the 2 month assignment and instead, argued on the spot and passed with flying colors and I see absolutely no difference with this. I get the concern with certain porn influencing sexual behavior. This site provides perfect scenarios for that with all the guys complaining that their women aren't as sexual as the girls they watch in the movies. I think this is sad in a way, but if porn is highly influential then at the same time, if a guy going home to fist or violently violate his women because he seen it in porn and wanted the experience.. then yeah, I'd be happy for the ban.
http://www.imdb.com/video/imdb/vi3985375257 Friday and Gannon are asked by a woman from Oregon to try to find her niece who has run away from home. Their search eventually leads them into the world of pornography and they soon become involved in the arrest of a pornographer who may have info on where she might be located. This episode they pursue the film makers but are told how the law is interpreted what is considered pornographic .. Obscenity was defined and judged as outside the protection of the First Amendment in Roth v. U.S. 354 U.S. 476(1957). In Miller v. California 413 U.S. 15(1973) the definition was refined by adding that obscenity, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value. Both cases can be viewed at http://www.findlaw.com/casecode/supreme.html by entering the citation.
What kind of an uptight asshole do you have to be to think there can possibly be something wrong with women squirting? If they were seriously worried about people being harmed....I could at least see their point if they were calling out the type of porn that tries to depict young adults as young teens. But, if rumors are to be believed....of course the ruling class doesn't see a moral problem with sex with minors. In fact, they seem perfectly content to fuck anyone over any way they can so they really have no room to lecture others.
There are now psychological studies that indicate that porn can be helpful and not harmful as many people still believe. Sexual abuse and rape is rarely due to pornography, but you still have people who insist it is. But most politics in most countries are still run from a religious perspective which depends on fear and guilt to control the masses. This is unlikely to change anytime soon.
The Scandinavian countries have the most liberal laws on pornography and they have on a per capita basis the least number of violent sexual attacks of women. Countries like Saudi Arabia and Iran have the most repressive laws against pornography and have the highest rates of violent sexual attacks against women.
Is this just for the publication of porn? Like, if yall still want your hardcore anal you can just extremetube it all yeah? Just no hardcore publication under UK law?
You will still be able to watch all the things they've banned simply by viewing material produced outside the UK. So not only is this stupid, it's pointless too
