It's on right now. Don't know about your area, but here we get a rerun of O'Reilly at 10:00 PM Central Daylight Savings Time, which I will have to watch as I missed the first part of the interview. So far what I have watched is interesting to be sure.
A laughable farce of a "debate" (read a volley of mere hyperbole) which sees O'Reilly doing what he does best, evading, blurring, and generally throwing up every lame excuse he can muster to avoid the truth at all costs. A prime example of what the neo-cons can muster as intellectual discourse. Franken has long since exposed him for the fraudster he is.
Unless you have absolutely nothing else to do, I wouldn't waste your time. It was pretty pointless, but if anything it was a pure example of extreme left and extreme right clashing heads and coming to absolutely no conclusion on any topic. I really expected more. It was frighteningly familiar to some of the discussions here .
Ha ha, Lick watches Fox. But you forgot to describe what Moore does best.....Evading, blurring, and generally throwing up every lame excuse he can muster to avoid the truth at all costs. They are one in the same, just at different ends of the turd.
Well, my feelings for them both are less than favorable. I'd still like to see this, though. I'll have to catch it when it airs again later on. I'm not by a TV at the moment.
Actually no, i wouldnt waste my time watching such a purely right wing ideology machine as Fox. I read the transcript of the "debate" on another board earlier. Sorry, but Moore stands head and shoulders above O'Reilly, Hannity, Coulter or any other Fox polemicist for factual substantiation. That you would claim otherwise is simply further evidence of the groupthink you obviously accept as intellectually honest analysis.
I won't argue that (O'Reilly and his Fox ilk are hard to beat for crap-spewing), but Moore isn't terribly objective himself. I mainly enjoy him as entertainment and because he aggravates conservatives. What O'Reilly and Moore do have in common is they both have massive egos, which is what I'd guess their interview would be more about than anything else.
Because anyone with anything bad to say about Michael Moore is clearly a groupthinking neo-con conformist right? I think the world would be a better place if we took all the Michael Moores and all the Bill O'Reilleys and sent them to an isolated, fenced-off area that nobody cares about, basically anywhere in Missisipi, and armed them to the teeth with explosives, rockets, and automatic weapons. The just let them kill each other.
I read the transcript as provided by another poster in another forum. I have no problem reading a farce such as this. Quite a different matter to submit oneself to a steady diet of O'Reilly's routine ideological nonsense. Surprising that one who purports to be so clever cannot tell the difference between the two concepts. Obviously you feel the need to make snide retorts for no other reason than to be contentious (otherwise known widely as being a troll).
And you live up to the moniker once again. Unless you have something of substantive relevance to add to the conversation, i would ask you to refrain from simply following me around picking whatever decontextualised snippets you so wish to simply deride me or anyone else here, as you are ever wont to do.
Maybe you should contextualise "Perhaps when you grow up and actually know more of the world..." so we can understand why it doesn't make you a troll. -- What could be more fun than Moore vs. O'Reilly? How about Moore at the Republican National Convention? http://quote.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000103&sid=abp.Qhqet9mI&refer=us As the Bloomberg article states, Hope its true.