MicroNukes used on WTC1,2 and 7

Discussion in 'Conspiracy' started by XR500Final, Apr 29, 2007.

  1. XR500Final

    XR500Final Member

    Dr Bill Deagle a NWO former insider involved in many above government projects has claimed on his nutrimedical show that 4th generation micronukes were employed with Thermate to bring down WTC1 and 2.

    He surmises that no amount of Thermate would have created the enormous temperatures of 1500F in the rubble pile as found by rescue workers.

    Video of Molten Metal Pools found weeks after the destruction of the building can be watched here : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oEoKhyXKWxQ

    According to his research the detonation of a 4th Generation Micro-Nuke generates a nano-pulse of heat at approximately 4 million degrees centigrade. This heat pulse was strong enough to turn the support columns to dust, and was able to cause cars to catch on fire at a distance. Not only this but he has stated that his high level NSA contacts have informed him that it was a sub-contract job employing the usage of Russian GRU agents, and Mossad Nuclear Technicians. Apparently they are all part of the high-level cult.

    Many pictures of the cars burning at a distance can be viewed here:
    Or here (in case the links 'disappear') This site thinks its 'Space Beam Weapons' which is a nice way to discredit the real reason.

    His program can be listened to at : http://www.nutrimedical.com

    Archives of his show are available at http://www.gcnlive.com

    A 3 hour special he did for the Granada forum is available online at http://www.anomalicresearch.com

    Related topics in the 3 hr special Black Mantra, Aurora Aircraft, Underground Cities, Quantum Computing Grid Array (Cray 5 Supercomputers), Ultraviolet Fiber Optics, Helium 3 Mining on the Moon, the coming 2 billion bird flu hit, and much more.
  2. Pressed_Rat

    Pressed_Rat Do you even lift, bruh?

    Good article. I posted an article regarding this a few weeks ago.
  3. CB_Brooklyn

    CB_Brooklyn Member

    There was no molten metal. Whatever evidence Steven Jones has of molten metal is fabricated. This has already been proven: http://www.911researchers.com/node/147

    Drs Judy Wood / Morgan Reynolds have NEVER said that the beam weapon must have from space. XR500Final's use of the term "space beam" is therefore disinfo. This tactic has also been used by Steven Jones and others in a poor attempt to discredit Judy and Morgan: http://www.911researchers.com/node/90
  4. Pressed_Rat

    Pressed_Rat Do you even lift, bruh?

    How can you say there was no molten steel? I've seen footage of the rescuers digging into the pile and it was oozing the stuff. There is also something they call the meteorite, which is like 4 floors of one of the towers melted and fused together into one mangled ball of twisted and once molten metal.

    I don't exactly agree with all of Jones' findings, either, and I think it was a lot more than just thermate that brought those buildings down. However, I am not going to deny there was molten steel because there most certainly was, and this is confirmed by the firefighters who were on the scene.

  5. shaggie

    shaggie Senior Member

    There was molten metal. It looked like silvery molten aluminum pouring out the north face of the south tower where the aircraft ended up. Metals such as copper, lead, and aluminum have melted during ordinary house fires. There's nothing unusual about that. The steel springs in beds have been known to melt during house fires.

    I haven't seen any direct evidence of molten steel samples from the WTC rubble. It's been mostly anecdotal accounts by people who stated they saw molten material in the rubble but not necessarily steel. The glass in the rubble of the WTC was known to form a glowing gooey mass. There was molten steel generated by the torch cutting operations during cleanup. The beam from 7WTC that is sometimes stated as being melted was eroded by a sulfur atmosphere at a temperature below the melting point of steel.

  6. shaggie

    shaggie Senior Member

    Judy Wood has lost her professor position at the university. Students were complaining about her performance. Jones also lost his professor position. Things have really fallen apart the past 6 months in the 911 conspiracy movement.

  7. shaggie

    shaggie Senior Member

    The meteor is an example of how floors pancaked into a sandwich. The twisted rod that is seen is what is left of the diagonal rod of the lightweight floor trusses.
  8. CB_Brooklyn

    CB_Brooklyn Member

    Look through my blog. The pouring molten out the south tower is most probably a fake video: http://www.911researchers.com/node/147
  9. CB_Brooklyn

    CB_Brooklyn Member

    The WTC Twin Towers did not collapse,
    they were pulverized!

    Where's the hundreds of tons of steel beams? Each tower was a 1/4 mile tall! On top of that, where's the thousands of desks, chairs, bookcases, computers, xerox machines, water coolers, filing cabinets, doors, sinks, toilets, etc?




    See Dr Judy Wood's site for the scientific analysis
  10. f(Ø)

    f(Ø) Member

    Who here actually has the scientific knowledge to claim one thing or another on their own without siting other supposed scientific experts? As far as I'm concerned, if you trust a "scientific expert" that says it's a conspiracy, you shouldn't think your knowledge is any better than that of someone trusting the tons of "non-fringe scientists" who claim the conspiracy theories are bunk. If there really are large conspiracies to control the world out there, then only the people who trust no one can consider themselves safe. If these conspiracies are a signifigant threat, then they must have the resources to make fake "conspiracy revealed" type of sites to trick you toward the wrong path. You'd never be able to trust one bit of infromation you got. If these conspiracies aren't actually a signifigant threat, then what is anyone worried about? You have to ask yourself, if there really is a worldwide conspiracy, who can you trust? The answer is no one. So why do you trust these sites to be telling the truth? Maybe, if this conspiracy you believe in is real, they put these sites in place just to discredit people who are able to intuit that there is a conspiracy. I don't see why people spend so much time believing one group of scientists and disbelieving another. Both groups could easily be lying to you. Unless you are a scientist yourself, you'll never have any idea.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice