Jesus= Charlie Manson

similar, both didnt have a job, both were into drugs/alcohol, bth "claimed" to be the son of "god" both led a group of mindless people with no sense of ndividualism. both ere cult leads. JESUS IS A CULT LEADER. YOU ALL ARE IN A CULT.

 

wow where did you get that amazingly rare photograph of Jesus? That should fetch a pretty good price.

 

First-century photography was at it's prime in galilee.

 

It also looks like hair products were top notch as well, his hair has a nice shine.

 

Yeah, okay...

 

What are you talking about? Jesus was carpenter.

 

And what's this about "into" drugs and alcohol? Are you referring to the claim that Jesus supplied wine at a wedding feast?

 

Where did carpenters get any wood?The forest there?Hmmm.

 

lol show me your time ticket where you went back in time and saw everything that Jesus did.

 

Jesus in "the last temptation" made some badass crosses...

 

Jesus didn't kill.

 

well gee fedup he was kind of busy being the messiah and saving the world.

Didn't you know?

 

But as Mark's Jesus would say "Shhh, its a secret"

 

The term that has been interpreted as "carpenter" could refer to other kinds of craftsmanship, including stone masonry. Your contention that he was an obvious hack has absolutely no empirical foundation, and your insistance that we show you one thing built by a common skilled laborer in a backwater province of the Roman Empire is beyond ridiculous. He was a carpenter or mason by trade but became an itinerant preacher and faith healer, receiving food and shelter from the people who valued these services.

 

You say (Hardly a reliable source). Again, it's absurd to expect artifacts of work by an ordinary mason or carpenter to be preserved for posterity. We have the tesimony of scripture, which is better than anything you've produced to the contrary.

 

I can only speak for myself but mine has improved ten fold since i believed in what you refer to as Fairy Tales. I can trace back to when i first left them as when my life started to slide.

 

I was speaking in relative terms. However problematic the Chrisitan scriptures are, they're superior to your evidence, which is nonexistent.

 

Not really. It is a philosophical study on what it would have meant to be Jesus, both God and Man. The struggle between the flesh and the spirit.

Yes it isn't based on he gospels, or a source in reality (it is based on the mind of Kazantzakis' mind). But hardly a comedy.

 

a

 

Isn't your post just an attempt to be clever about saying "I hate Jesus"?