The way to look at Global Warming, is to look at it as GLOBAL POLLUTION, which is a much more ACCURATE description of what MAN has done to create this scenario. Ever since I was a KID, I was taken aback by the amount of pollution being spewed everyday into our environment. Even as a KID, I knew this was WRONG. I grew up in NYC in the 1950s & 1960s, which besides London was the MOST POLLUTED city in the world at that time. Everyday I'd walk to school and breathe in the most noxious fumes from cars (no catalytic converters back then, really bad). I realized then that my generation needed to do something about it because if we didn't those fumes were just going to PILE UP in our atmosphere and eventually we'd be breathing them ALL THE TIME, with no escape. Then in my 20s I traveled the world, and saw how the WHOLE WORLD was adding their share to the pollution. I saw huge piles of plastic garbage wash up on Bali's beaches because the Balinese never had to deal with non-biodegradable materials until recently. So I saw how ill-equipped the rest of the world, esp. the Third World was to deal with new forms of pollution that didn't exist before in their societies. So the fact that MAN POLLUTES the environment is indeed a no-brainer. The fact that this pollution adds up and IMPACTS not only humans but the rest of the environment, doesn't require a scientist to understand. Our knowledge of ecology, weather patterns, atmospheric chemistry and other sciences have come a long way in the last few decades to explain how air and water pollution doesn't just stay in one place but gets spread around the world. Now in the 21st Century, we have MOUNTAINS OF SCIENTIFIC FACTS to support this LOGICAL CONCLUSION, that humans are poisoning themselves and the planet. Fuck, EVERYBODY knows that! So all this DENIER shit is just the CORPORATIONS protecting their asses over this, cause they SHOULD ALL BE SUED, and indeed back in the 60s and 70s we tried to sue their asses, and many had to PAY for their pollution. Of course this gov't just rolls over for their big corporate sponsors and so NOBODY gets prosecuted for this pollution anymore. It's a HIGH CRIME, and BUSH and Congress should be held accountable.
But why are you now trying to equate man-made global warming to the denial of pollution? I have acknowledged countless times that pollution is a real problem, as it impacts the air we breathe, the food we eat, and the water we drink. THIS is irrefutable.
Then we're agreed. Since rising atmospheric CO2 and other greenhouse gases affect and will affect the quality of our environment we should most certainly consider them pollution
How does CO2 affect the quality of our environment? That's like saying oxygen affects the quality of our environment. If anything, CO2 is the sign of a healthy environment, because the more plantlife flourishes, the more CO2 is released into the atmosphere. This is why it's no surprise that a rise in CO2 levels lags behind a rise in temperature by -- according to ice core samples -- 800 years. It makes sense that, as the temperatures become warmer, more plants grow, which give off more CO2.
Thanks, Rat, once again the truth wins out. If what you say is true, then we shouldn't be seeing rising CO2 levels for another 600 years, but we're seeing it NOW, aren't we? Which implies that this is not an ORDINARY, NATURAL, occurence, but an abberation, one in which man has played the key role... And none of this explains the increase in METHANE which is far more poisonous and detrimental to our planet...
What??? CO2 affects the quality of our environment in that very rapid rises in CO2 can induce very rapid climate change, which has proven difficult for many organisms/ecosystems to deal with in the past. Mass extinction negatively affects the quality of our environment, need I explain that...? Atmospheric CO2 certainly isn't a sign of a healthy environment. It is a sign that there are sources of CO2 As plant life grows it lowers atmospheric CO2, it doesn't raise it. Over the last million years of glacial-interglacial cycles, CO2 lags the onset of climate change because the climate began to warm before the ocean and permafrost began giving up CO2. That is to be expected with Milkanovitch cycles--the polar regions warm a bit, causing the ocean to release CO2 and permafrost to melt, plant detritus to decompose, and permafrost to give up CO2. The increased atmospheric CO2 provides a positive feedback, playing a large role in the next 4200 years of warming (it normally takes ~5000 years for climate to warm completely when coming out of a glacial period). If you believe that growing plants are a SOURCE of CO2, you may want to think about brushing up on some very basic biology Chris
Plants are consumers as well as producers of CO2. Plants take in CO2 during the day and give off C02 at night. CO2 from human activity accounts for very little CO2 compared to that which is given off by plants, volcanoes and the oceans.
....do I really need to explain this? Yes, of course plants take in and give off CO2, but they take in much more than they give off. Hence, they are net sinks of CO2. If they were not there would be no such thing as primary production or food chains or ecosystems. Plants are net SINKS of CO2, period. Volcanoes give off relatively little CO2 compared to most fluxes in the biosphere, about 1/150th as much as due to the burning of fossil fuels. The oceans, which contain a heck of a lot of phytoplankton, are net sinks of CO2, just like terrestrial plants. Recent studies suggest that the oceans are sinking CO2 much more slowly than they used to though, meaning that more of the CO2 we put into the atmosphere will remain there, instead of being absorbed by the biosphere. Chris
Yes, the carrying capacity of the seas for CO2 has been reached. That's why it is building up faster and faster in the atmosphere. It still absorbs CO2, but it can't absorb it any faster. And as HUMANS produce more each day, it continues to build up and won't go away! Likewise Methane is increasing even faster because it doesn't get absorbed at all. And it's definitely a deadly poison, unlike CO2... (You'll never see rat mention methane... He hasn't been given any talking points on it yet, cause there are none to give, esp. when Methane will be the gas that kills us all...)
Hmmm, I'm not sure that "methane will be the gas that kills us all," but the rapid rise in methane is a serious problem that needs some serious solutions. Methane will never get to a concentration that is directly toxic--that isn't the concern. Methane is such a powerful greenhouse gas, though, that just a little can dramatically change the climate. cj
RIGHT... I concur with the person who said you need to brush up on basic biology. Plants which contain chloroplasts create sugars using the CO2 in the atmosphere and water using sunlight as the energy source. The byproduct is oxygen. The process is called photosynthesis. Here's a formula: 6 CO2(gas) + 6 H2O(liquid) + photons → C6H12O6(aqueous) + 6 O2(gas) If there is more CO2 being released, it might be due to the fact that the Amazon, which is responsible for a large percentage of CO2 aborsbtion, is being destroyed. We are removing the buffers that keep CO2 levels in check, while increasing the amount of CO2 released. Another important factor to remember is the carbon cycle. There is a lot of carbon hiding out in fossil fuels, which accumulated over hundreds of millions of years. We are burning the fuel at a MUCH faster rate than the fuel is developing. In other words, the huge amount of Carbon which has been removed from the cycle is suddenly released into the atmosphere (in geologic time, a hundred or so years is nothing). Now, remember that the plant buffers are removed due to deforestation. What do you get? A shit ton of Carbon in the atmosphere! If you are curious about the Carbon cycle and our effects on it, here is a good link: http://www.cotf.edu/ete/modules/carbon/efcarbon.html Peace and love
Hello. Global Warming is certainly a reality. But it constitutes perhaps 5% of the damage we are doing to the environment. Direct damage to the land from construction and resource extraction and industrial agriculture and liquid and solid pollutants from all phases of industry are responsible for most of the harm. Then there are the oceans, into which most waterborn and airborn pollutants make their way. The "inconvenient truth" has become a convenient obsession for psuedo-progressives who want to go on living like they do and to pretend that they are environmentalists. Global Warming has become a green herring. Littlefoot
Hence the reason to call it Global Pollution instead of Global Warming, because it's about much more than that, and Industry and overpopulation are as much to blame as ever, regardless of their contributions to "global warming". So let's NEVER AGAIN use the misnomer, Global Warming and instead call it Global Pollution, which is indeed the BIG PROBLEM humanity and the world faces!
Hey Skip. I'm with you, basically. But a lot of the damage is due to direct, physical destruction rather than what we usually think of as pollution. Pollution + Destruction = Postruction ? It's more lifestyle than it is population. If we cut our ecological footprints way down the Earth can support more of us. Littlefoot
The physical destruction is A BIG part of the pollution problem. If you cut down a million trees, what happens to them? They go up in smoke, and THAT is pollution. If you destroy a hillside to build slums, the resulting floods and landslides create pollution. If you dredge a waterway to make a new canal you've polluted and destroyed an entire ecosystem. And yes, it IS about destroying entire ecosystems now. Because that is how far we have progressed with our pollution. It's now possible to see the day when HUGE oceanic ecosystems will collapse, possibly reducing the lifeforms in them by 90% or more. Then it won't be long before mass starvation and other world wide ecological crises make living on this planet HELL! "Global Warming" as it has appeared thus far is the LEAST of our worries...
I have said this all along and have been attacked for it. Now you're acknowledging it. Never once have I denied that pollution is a problem.
I say that because I KNOW calling it Global Warming is a misnomer and distraction from the ACTUAL problem which is GLOBAL POLLUTION. We've known about Global Pollution since I was a little tyke. It's NOTHING NEW. That's what disturbs me more than anything is all these politicians and scientists acting like it's something they just figured out, when there were good studies done in the 60s and 70s, many predicting most of the problems we face now. The other problem with calling it global warming is people think THAT is the main problem, but it's just another SYMPTOM of the greater problems of overpopulation and global pollution and unbridled Capitalistic greed. Indeed the whole SYSTEM is the problem. You can't just blame a global elite. They have inherited the same system we did. They didn't invent it yesterday. It's the SYSTEM that must change if we are to survive. Global warming distracts us, as we spend billions putting band-aids on a problem here and a problem there. Meanwhile the System trudges on, still polluting, still overpopulating, still WARMING THE PLANET. Until we have a REVOLUTION overturning the existing system, it will remain essentially unchanged, and we can expect the same result - massive ecosystem collapse (which I knew was coming back in 1970). So you see EVERYTHING is exactly the same, nothing has changed in 40 years, except the levels of population and pollution, which were predicted to cause catastophic crises after the year 2000. So why is everyone so surprised? Maybe the fact that our gov't has chosen to hide the data for decades. Maybe the fact that since Bush has been in power every effort was made not just to hide the data, but to deny it, obscure it, censor it, etc. The facts of Global Pollution are there as they have always been. The only difference now is ppl can no longer afford to ignore it as they have been doing my whole lifetime. And, Rat, you say global warming isn't caused by man's activities, but indeed it is... And that is the source of our disagreements. I'm just saying it's ONE OF MANY SYMPTOMS we can expect to get worse thanks to the major problems I mentioned. You see it's completely possible to EXPLAIN what is going on with our planet without needing to refer to Global Warming, The Global Elite, Al Gore, etc. Those terms are used to frame the issue in POLITICAL terms, when it is an ENVIRONMENTAL issue, not a political one. Well at least until the revolution! Don't get caught up in labels because then you are just a pawn of the media.
I've read a lot of your posts, PR, and you are right about almost everything. Except that you refuse to accept the simple fact that the environmental challenge that faces us is a collective problem. It is the result of hundreds of millions of people living supermaterialistic lifestyles and all of us wanting more and more and more and believing that this is our God-given right. You want to blame it all on relatively small groups of extremely wealthy people who are, in reality, simply the managers of a system created by hundreds of millions of people for whom material greed is a way of life. But they don't see it as material greed because it is just the way they were raised. And it is what makes this system work: You have a responsibility to consume as much as you can because the more you consume the more jobs and investment revenues are created. But more fundamentally, even, if you don't buy what your neighbor is selling, he/she won't have enough money to buy what you are selling. The super-rich managers of this system exist because of the system. They don't create it. We do. They just exploit our greed. And keep the system running for us. The system stinks, and it only works because we make it work. No corporation could exist for a minute if people didn't buy its products and work for it and invest in it. Littlefoot
Yes, and although Rat admits Pollution is "a" problem. It is indeed THE #2 problem facing humanity next to overpopulation, which is #1. You can't stop ppl from Fucking and Shitting so 7 Billion fucking people, stewing in their own SHIT, is what we now have. Putting the blame anywhere else is a Red Herring. Of course the SYSTEM is to blame for allowing things to get to this state. That's because the system was setup to GROW. And the system isn't considered healthy unless it's growing. That is the fundamental LIE that too many people have accepted as TRUTH, perpetuating the problem. People accept this lie because it means that they can PROFIT from it. The reality is that it's perfectly fine to have a STABLE system that is in balance with the world's ecosystems, that DOESN'T grow and consume more resources, but continually strives to improve the QUALITY of life for everyone, rather than the QUANTITY of lives that exist on this ever shrinking planet.