I have seen the light!

you forgot to use the word "sheep"

 

:iamwithstupid: Happy 4-20 to you too.

:ssmokeit:

 

Yeah it would work, But ALL the savages would come out of the woodwork. To an extent, There has to be order.

Now if all carried guns, Then thats a peaceful crowd. Who will be billy badass and shoot off their mouth with a room of self defense wits. So that would leave 'last man standing' mentality (sp?) and another fail.

I do see some points, He is a commie and its obvious to anyone unless they choose to look away. But if was up to us, States, Dealing with their own problems, Much better off.

I dont like the fact they think they can handle my funds better than I which has shown to be a false lie and a trillion(s) dollar debt.

 

OP solved the problem, and NWO fucks like you come in here, to try to weasel laws into the equation, and ruin the whole thing....

 

The rampant crime and disorder seen in society is a product of the system itself, which thrives on these things. Funny how the bigger and more intrusive government becomes, the worse things get on all angles. This is then used to promote the notion we need even more government to solve the problems the government helped to create in the first place. What a vicious cycle.

I hate all government and anything involving hierarchy. It has done nothing but bad.

I am an anarchist in theory, but I know that would never work because the system has created dependency. People cannot handle true freedom at this point, which is sad.

 

So true, Morpheus. So true.

 

The main thing that would reduce crime of all types would be a world-wide end to poverty,free to all healthcare and a free socially inclusive education system.People also need good quality public housing.When I say free this would be paid for by current income tax systems that would have more money in the coffers as a result of reduction in money spent on the police force and keeping people in jails.If this were practised on world-wide scale there would also be billions saved from a reduced needed to manufacture and sell arms,as war would eventually become a thing of the past - as it should.Obviously conflict resolution would be needed to achieve this end and that is why the admittedly flawed political structure would still be needed to enact this,as humankind moves forward into a way of life based on natural human law - the law of the unprejudiced and open hearted and unblocked communal mindset.Everyone would be able to find their place in society,there would be no material want,and slowly people would move away from the kind of rampant materialism and consumerism that is currently blighting the planet and people's minds.People would still go to work,study and within reason do what they want as long as it is not infringing other's right to do what they want.We would have a global society and culture,whilst still preserving regional and cultural differences between nations.This would not be a global New World Order,but true civilisation.We would still have infrastructure and organisational departments,but an end to American imperialism and any other kind of nefarious meddling in the rights of people to self-determination.Obviously a lot of work would have to go into solving the Middle East crisis.A new kind of open-hearted diplomacy would be needed and an attempt to end the cycle of endless recrimination that perpetuates conflict.There would still be a money system,possibly forever,possibly not,but the banking and financial system would have to be drastically overhauled BY LAW.All babies are born innocent,pure and good,and it is fucked up socialisation and broken environments that is responsible for most of society's ills.Obviously there must be a powerful drive to challenge the existing energy companies monopoly on energy creation so we can sort out this environmental problem and establish renewable green energy production - which is totally possible from harnessing the sun,waves,tides,wind and also geo-thermal vents.I am not an anarchist,liberal,democrat,socialist,republican or any of your stupid labels.I know the vision I am describing is idealist - but what kind of world would it be without idealism? Such a world would not be perfect,but it would be a whole lot better.We have the intellectual,material and technological resources to bring about this change.If you don't like what I'm saying,I suggest you take a look at yourself and think again.Just getting rid of laws as things are today would not in itself be much help,although I know where the OP is coming from.That is if you prohibit things through laws then people will feel a psychological urge to break that law.But getting to a way of life with minimal laws would only be possible through a gradual evolution of global human consciousness.Peace.Over and out.

 

You think someone will read that?

Paragraphs, my friend, paragraphs.

 

I know I should have probably broken it up into paragraphs.I also gather English is not your first language Bird.However I would have thought most people would be capable of reading a page of text if they wanted to.Probably a lot don't want to.

 

jaz indid, inlis is not mai fist langug

 

Can we keep traffic laws? I'm a stickler for following the rules of the road.

You liberal pussies , why do you think you have an index finger? That made me lols

 

We'll see how that stacks up against the Law of Sheet Metal, which states that the right of way belongs to whichever vehicle weighs the most. I'll be purchasing a 5-ton truck to drive to work and to the grocery store.

 

Not sure what your problem is, Meagain.

Apparently you take issue with what I believe.

I can't say that I care.