Hillary Clinton

since my libertarian vote wont mean shit.. Im voting for the dickhead .. Im very much done with this lying hag..

 

What's Hillary hiding under her pants suit?

 

mic kit..

 

Every intelligent person knows that's where the switch the illuminati use to control her lies.

 

Sorry.....but Trump is an idiot......my bad. Fool was too nice.....

 

i appreciate the write-in, but i'm technically not old enough to be president anyway.

 

Lolzzzzz what dumbass tried to turn that into a conspiracy theory

Uh uhh uhh duhh oh it couldn't be a Mic battery ugh ugh uhh

Maybe whatever it is, is made of steel, becuase steel is magic and it does not bend under burning jet fuel

What a laugh

 

I don't mind the hate and dislike Clinton gets, I can understand it.

What I find more pitiful is how superficial the dislike and motivation for it IN GENERAL sounds. I mean if Neonspectraltoast is the most constructive and substantial critizers (and in this thread he is ) what does that say about the average smart pants in this thread?
I hope you guys at least secretly realize it is you that for a large part the reason why your country is becoming such a shithole. All this hate and dislike for a unlikeable candidate is understandable on itself but as most posts here show a lot of people don't really know shit about the details, they don't really care about participating in some change, they just want to cry about how there never will be change and make sure they know how hopeless it all is and that its better to just give up because nothing will change ever through votes. You don't get change if you're an apathic bunch of whiners. Of course it goes down if the majority doesn't vote or vote for the wrong reasons on one of these 2 parties.

And hey, shouldn't a debate between presidential candidates in a proper democracy feature ALL the candidates of all the parties? Especially if there are more debates than one. It seems americans put too much faith/trust in polls as well. It seems clear a lot of the dissatisfied citizenry have given up, which is an important reason why politics can go as they are going right now over there, but the sad thing is all these people are only blaming politics. Uhm, people believe it or not, if you want the system to improve you have to do something yourself. Whiny losers.

 

A nail just got hit on the head

Your best post ever

 

Apparently, not.

(Dr. Jill)Stein(Green Party) and Libertarian presidential candidate Gary Johnson were excluded from last night’s debate at Hofstra University under stringent rules set by the Commission on Presidential Debates, which is controlled by the Democratic and Republican parties.

Green Party presidential nominee Dr. Jill Stein was escorted off campus by Hofstra security and Nassau County police, despite the fact that she was invited on site by MSNBC, ABC, Fox and CBS for interviews.

At least 24 people were arrested.

http://www.democracynow.org/2016/9/27/outside_first_presidential_debate_24_arrested

 

If you want to see Jill Stein's answers to the debate questions, I made a thread for it.

 

My dislike of Clinton is based on her disregard for the law. My motivation for my dislike of Clinton is based on her disregard for the law. My dislike of you is based on your acceptance of Clinton's disregard for the law.

 

I think the key word in that sentence you quoted of me is 'proper'. In a properly functioning democracy they would be included. It's really no wonder people forget about the other options, or see them as worthless, when everything is clearly about these 2 butthole parties. It should be thought of as absurd. Plain simple.

You are confusing me with someone else.

 

Very convenient.

 

I have participated in this thread. I have presented evidence that Clinton had to have been aware that she was breaking protocol when it came to her email bullshit. It was an accurate criticism. You consider that non constructive?

 

Well I can make you happy then: without kidding that actually ment to say 'one of the most'.

 

Thanks . . .

Not interested in being made happy. Just interested in not being unjustly criticized for what research turns up.

 

Strangely enough, George W. Bush was also seen with something under his clothes during the 2004 debates as well.

Article from Salon.com

NASA photo analyst: Bush wore a device during debate

http://www.salon.com/2004/10/30/bulge_5/



So if a photo analyst from NASA said that Dubya had something under his clothes during the debates in 2004, why is it unheard of or absurd to think that Hillary was possibly wearing something as well?

 

Asmo, you are easily one of the more annoying people on this website. Do you even have your own opinion about anything, or do you just like to argue with people for the sake of arguing? Either way, it gets old after a while. Nobody cares about your opinion about what people are posting. Your biases clearly show while pretending to be some weird kind of mediator who butts into discussions without ever really contributing anything relating to the actual topic. You just want to argue for whatever reason. It's kind of odd, really.

 

I'd be willing to say that it is a Microphone kit, but then what is the purpose of the podium microphones.