Grrrr Bush !!!!

Here are some links to some news articles I read today. Kind of made me angry, and I wonder why people brush it off. I was also trying to find an article where congress will allow the goverment to spy into what books, or websites people are into in Public Libraries. Gotta love the Patriot Act, and I think I will dub it Big Brother Act.

Mortar attack on Iraqi Hotel KILLS A CHILD
http://http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/0709Iraq09-ON.html

Senate panel: CIA was wrong on Iraqi weapons
http://http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/0709IraqPanel09-ON.html
I knew that they were making up those claims of WMD up! They had no reason to go to Iraq and save the world, and the Iraqis.

Pentagon: Bush Military Records Destroyed (How convenient)
http://http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/B/BUSH_MILITARY_SERVICE?SITE=AZPHG&SECTION=HOME

 

the 1st two arent surprising, but I wonder what they are trying to cover up with destroying those records.

 

Supposedly Bush went AWOL on a cocaine binge when he was in the military.

 

thats really funny, and believable

 

believing that without physical evidence is like buying the story that richard gere had to have a gerbil surgically removed from his ass. the story is titillating and sounds good, but there's no evidence.

 

When the cocaine issue was raised in the 2000 campaign, bush ran away from it like a little girl. He wouldn't admit, deny, or renounce the use of cocaine..He just refused to let the word come out of his mouth. When one refuses to be honest, it only leaves the rest of the world to speculate, and rightfully so. Whenever we heard about Clinton and another woman, it was just assumed it had to be true.

 

It's no secret that bush used cocaine heavily for a long time. It wouldn't be unlikely that he went on a binge during his time in the military. His military record is already questionable, why would it be so hard to believe that it was because of cocaine?

It's a little different from the richard gere thing, because ol richie doesn't seem to have a history of needing asshole surgery, or keeping gerbils around.

 

bush didn't deny cocaine usage, nor having gone to rehab. i'm shocked that so many here would consider that a bad thing or something even once worth mentioning. i can't think of anyone i know who hasn't done drugs or alcohol. i don't really consider that a point worth mentioning unless it's a current problem. aside from rumor-mongering which has the distinct smell of malicious gossip without evidence for personal titillation, i've heard nothing and have seen nothing to indicate current drug usage. i think bush comes up with his bad ideas perfectly sober.

 

Pentagon: Bush Military Records Destroyed (How convenient)

http://www.nytimes.com/corrections.html
An article yesterday about the destruction of some payroll records of National Guard members, including President Bush, misstated the record of White House acknowledgment of the loss. The White House indeed took note of the missing information last February when it released hundreds of pages of Mr. Bush's military files. In a briefing paper for reporters on Feb. 10, summarizing those files, it noted that payroll records for the third quarter of 1972 had been lost when they were transferred to microfiche.

These are/were payroll records that were microfiched. Not much info there. It does sound better when it is said like Bush Military Records Destroyed.They even let the press know 5 months ago.

 

did i say it was bad? All I meant was that it wouldn't be unrealistic for him to go awol because he was on it. That was the point. You said it was bullshit because there was no evidence of it, and I'm saying that at the time there WAS evidence, evidence that he admitted to. Twist that in any sort of way you want, but it doesn't change anything.

It's worth mentioning because it was entirely possible and very likely during that time period. I never said he was CURRENTLY on drugs, and I don't think anyone else did, either.

 

i find dragging up bush's drug addiction record at this point in time as aggravating as when people would pull up clinton's pot smoking incident. it was so in the past, the act of a young man. clinton did plenty of shit to piss me off without dragging up something totally irrelevant and a weak, cheap shot. it's a hearsay thing. isn't his political record enough to indict the man without gossip?

 

It's so funny that people get pissy now that dirt is being dug up on Bushboy, after Clinton was put through the ringer over his blowjob/cigar/cum on the dress/ incidents in the White House. What goes around, comes around and if you can't take the heat, well get out of the fucking kitchen, y'all!!

We spent millions thanks to Ken Starr and the "Right-Wing Conspiracy" trying to get Clinton to admit he had (God forbid) sex in the Oval Office. What's a few million more to go after Bush and his cocaine escapades and his lying about it! Fucking hypocrites! Unleash the dogs on Bush, I say. Let's get an "Independent Counsel" to look into this! Where is Ken Starr? Maybe we can get him to go after Bush in regards to the lies he invoked to get us into the Iraq war!!! And all you Rebub's and Conserviscum say that a blowjob in the Oval Office is worse than instigating an unfounded war in Iraq! You Convservatives have ZERO morals!!!!! Will you please find a Republican website to frequent, instead of this one.

 

Dirt being dug up at all is crap. it just souldn't be done. Right now republicans are trying to get kerry's divorce records out to the public. I hate kerry but thats is still BS.

 

why do you hate kerry? because he might stop all the killing in Iraq?

 

I'm going for Kerry over Bush, of course, but he's not going to dismantle the war in Iraq. Maybe he will subside it some by getting international support, but he's not going to end the war.

 

thats still better than what bush is doing

 

Hey, never argued against that. Bush is just pretty damn bad, it's a given.

 

you're completely missing the point. i don't give a shit about what clinton did before he was in office, that was past, and none of my business. what he did while IN office is the business of the american public. same with bush. what a young man does in his less that brilliant youth is pretty much irrelevant when it's not affecting his current methods and behaviors. once again BUSH'S PRESIDENTIAL RECORD IS ENOUGH TO INDICT HIM WITHOUT RESORTING TO "i heard he went awol while on coke." (caps for emphasis, not yelling). you think that because i disagree with dredging up unproven gossip in bush's past means i'm pissed off that aything's being dredged up at all. completely wrong. get the emphasis on shit that's happening now, there's more than enough material there to work with, and it's immenentily relevant.

 

Dude what the crap? I've explained to you I think 2 times now that im not "pro killing in Iraq". That statement you made isn't relative relative to the topic at hand so seriously go away. Besides, kerry has already stated that he won't pull out of Iraq.

 

Yeah, but Bush never lied under oath (he mad sure that he never took an oath in the first place, but that's not the point). And like MKC said, what goes on outside the White House is a president's own business, what goes on IN the White House is America's business. And as far as I know Bush is sober.