My fragmented world view is my speculations of what this world is, mere interpretation what’s really out there… the truth? The structure of the universe is not made of points but of connections it’s the meaning which is observable when two or more points give meaning and value to each other. It can be viewed as a mathematical formula a logical structure expressed as a geometrical shape which we experience as reality that we live in. Now then the body is simply an extension of this shape while the mind seems to function only as input/output point it’s a monad an indivisible basic element of physical reality. The beauty of it is such that this single point can be viewed as the center the meaning of the structure providing it’s a cluster a focus point of connections it is the network itself yet it can be identified as being a specific part of it and there for the totality of the structure gives a specific meaning relative to that one part. It’s a vantage point from which a unique geometrical shape emerges = the universe, I’m the universe it’s the prevailing first thought of the mind when it first witnessed the world since the only way of coming up with this is to first realize that u are a finite entity and the world is the other infinite one its very easy to find urself in awe for u are creating meaningful existence inside outside. Imagine the moment in time when the first spark of self awareness was born within a body of this universe within an animal’s nerves system. For the first time a definition of the world from an individual’s perspective was emerging out of patters and shapes that surrounds us. It’s a bit like god popping in to existence out of unidentified chaos or out of nothingness in to nothingness and creating the world within it which is pure thought. But this was a god of a single perspective yet the world can be view from many directions the only way to see the true nature of reality is by mathematical language which is made possible by the similarities between the two private perspectives by merging the two u construct dimensional view of the world which is most definitely more accurate recreation… could we say that language/communication is a connection between any two points that cannot be seen yet it is necessary for the logical structure that we are so accustomed to. I wonder sometimes could the evolution of mind be describable in a same way as that of evolution tree of life is but instead of species/design evolving u get words/ideas evolve and this structure/network = the tree of mind is what gives meaning to all that we know it’s what we call to this day god it’s a single thought that was ones born and is still in contemplation/creating…
the physical universe is substantive. sentience, even sapience, is incidental to it. which doesn't mean what you see is all you get. but it does mean humanity's collective ego is ridiculous. a single planet or solar system does not a universe make either. even one planet/world though, is not dependent on a single sapient species, however much damage to it, we might be capable of causing. but the continued existence of that species, is entirely dependent on the myriad and diverse factors that make its world hospitable to it. thinking we KNOW is ego too. truth is there. its not hiding. but its not about what we tell ourselves or each other. its simply there. wishing us no harm, but not grieving over our potential collective self destruction and resulting loss. god gives great hugs, but leaves it up to us to grow up.
