i am circumcised and i LOVE it but i was circumcised without really nowin what would happen. I was seven and was asked could i pull my foreskin back by my mom, i couldnt so i said no. Later i was takin to the doctor and he examined me and well then he said id have to get circumcised. Ive had so many good experiences not havin one but i dont what it would have been like to wank without seein my purple glans or have even an erection with the a foreskin. So anyway id like to know of peoples experiences with foreskins or bein circumcised please. I know this is already a topic but i want to start my own.
I'm sorry to tell you, mate, but that was a mistake. Not being able to pull the foreskin back IN ADULT can be diagnoses as phimosis (tight foreskin), but a kid cannot technically have it. At seven, most kids can't pull their foreskin back. I don't remember peeling mine back until I was 11 or so. I'm intact, myself. If you are from Dublim, Ireland, most fellas ain't cut. How do women respond to your cock? I'm quite curious about it. Do they like it? Are they indifferent? Tell all.
I'm not cut, but it doesn't affect me really. I can't pull my foreskin back but then again, I don't need to. Nobody else sees it so no problems.
I couldn't stand the idea of losing one of the most sensitive parts of your body. The foreskin's very important for lovemaking, as it provides a natural lubricant and strokes the vagina. Moreover, the foreskin's also full of nerve endings that enhance sexual pleasure when stimulated. Circumcision has no benefits for a man. It's an old primitive religious practise, practised by harsh authoritarian societies that suppress women and want to collectivise men (hence the cruel symbol of circumcision). That's why only the authoritarian desert religions practise it: Islam and Judaism. In America in the 19th century that barbaric practise was introduced under the harsh, neurotic Victorians, who thought that masturbation was evil and unhealthy, and they thought that by removing the foreskin you could diminish a boy's natural urge to enjoy his penis. It's a cruel, barbaric practise from a different age. It should be abandoned. There are no medical advantages to it, only psychological disadvantages and the result is less pleasure.
Yeah, John, you're absolutely right. Very, very well said. It doesn't have any benefits for the woman, either. Even if she's too stupid to realise it. I'm uncut and clean, goddamnit.
Doesn't matter to me if most girls like it or not. Only person that gets to see me naked is ME. I'm not sharing with anyone!!
Your mother aught to wash your mouth out with lemon and bleach. Understandably tensions run high when it comes to this debate. I've met happy circumcised men, and I've met unhappy ones. Whether or not you feel like a piece of cut up meat for women's "benefit" or not, get it through your thick head that women have been feeling like meat since the dawn of time. (And in many cultures, continue to do so under intense patriarchy). There are always differing opinions. Culturally. Personally.
I've had a few of each and so far i prefer uncut. They're more fun to play with, they feel better inside and most uncut guys have got more feeling on the head of their penis. I can literally bring my fiance to his knees by using my tongue on his head. The previous guy i was with was cut and he reckoned it felt nice but wasn't anything special. That's just me though. I don't think it really matters as much as people think. If they guy is happy and confident and he knows how to use it, who cares.
Hannah, why attack me? Get a grip of yourself, you moron. What was wrong with what I said? Women gain NOTHING from being with a circumcised man. IN FACT, there are things they are (obviously) missing out on. Fact. I find the idea of taking a knife to every baby boy's penis in the entire world because some IGNORANT whores think it's "cuter" to be absolutely repulsive. If you don't agree, you are wrong, and probably emotionally/mentally unstable. Let's talk about taking a knife and cutting the hood of your clitoris off. Then let's have lots of men come on and say it's "cleaner" and "sexier" and see how you like it. Please, have you not a shred of humanity? So that makes the barbaric practice entirely justifiable. Really. A useless opinion. So this is your real issue, isn't it? You feel your life is tough because you're a woman, so your silly, overly-emotional, intellect-free response to hate men in return. Women feel like meat, do they? I don't believe that over 60% of women in the U.S. have someone CUT OFF part of their genitalia without their consent? Am I wrong? No. Don't bring a "sexism" issue where it doesn't belong. Really. Do you think everything is easy for men? Explain why rates of suicide and depression for males tower over females? Explain the "angry young man" phenomenon? Explain why men die younger from stress-related illnesses. One has nothing to do with the other. If you cannot talk sensibly, piss off. Yes, let's circumcise the little boys, let's circumcise the little boys because the world is just so damn sexist. You are a twat. We ain't talking about other cultures, here. Don't go on about feminism. If you want to talk about fucking feminism, go to the "Women's Issues" board. This isn't the place. You are embarrassing yourself. We're dealing with fact here. Is it wrong to circumcise a newborn baby boy without his consent? Yes. Are their benefits for the male? No. Are there benefits for the female? Certainly not. Is it done out of ignorance, and kept popular through herd-mentality? Yes. Does the U.S. government make BILLIONS of dollars a year from it? Yes. Will this have any affect on how "authorities" educate the masses on circumcision, and what doctors tell patients? Yes. "Culture" has nothing to do with circumcision, you fucking idiot. I suppose you support the right of African fathers to circumcise their daughters? That is their culture, after all. It is EXACTLY the same principle. THINK about what you are saying. Not if you have mental health. You clearly hate men, and want to punish them, even little baby men. You are sick and your opinion counts for nothing.
I like pussy with the hood of the clit ripped off. Nothing gets me goin' like mutilated pussy. Mmmhmm! I surely hope none of you fuckers ever have kids.
A baby boy... - is taken away from his mother, hearing only voices he doesn't recognise - is placed on a table - is strapped down so he can't move his arms or legs, and can barely move his head - doctors slap a disinfectant that stings onto the baby's genitals - the doctor tears the foreskin from the surface of the glans (image bamboo shoots up your fingernails, but worse) by sticking a sharp instrument underneath and tearing it around (imagine your hymen being torn, but a million times worse) - NO PAINKILLERS ARE BEING USED - the most nerve-rich part of the male anatomy is cut off - the baby, who has been screaming the entire time, goes into shock, and no longer attempts to move - what's left of the skin is pulled right back to prevent it from healing to the edge of the head - the blood and disinfectant is wiped off - the baby is left alone ------------------------------------------- If you DON'T have a problem with that, you are sick. If you DON'T have a problem with women saying they think the results are "cute" or "sexy", you are sick.
Obviously you don't have your facts straight. Get a less biased source and maybe, just maybe I'll have something of substance to say to you. mutilated pussy, fuck you
You're all going to extemes on the issue. Yes, it is blatantly wrong. yes, there are no medical benefits. But someone doesn't deserve to have their head bitten off because they think cut penises are sexier. Personally, I like the look of uncut better, but then again, I am uncut, so I'm probably biased.
Dear Seamus, the only poor moron is the person I see struggling against a very weak argument. Let us leave name calling out of this more or less complicated and mature debate, shall we? Ironically, it seems you have an intense hatred for women as women (?) fuel this business, is that so? I'm actually under the impression that much of circumcision is fueled by religious myths and the belief that it is "cleaner". By both women and men, mothers and fathers. Fortunately this train of thought is not as rampant as it used to be. I can understand that for one who has been cut, who has seen their loved ones cut, will feel very differently as it's nearly their whole world that has been affected by circumcision - a very personal decision that was made for them by someone else and entirely out of their control. If you had a sliver of intellect, you would have understood my annoyance based primarily on your language and filth about the female sex. I was NOT arguing for circumcision both female and male. Culturally or not, even if female genital mutilation (FGM) is practiced outside of the US, I'm assuming you also find it offensive. As do I. And women do try to fight against it, speak out against it when they can. As you are. As personally, we all should. Secondly I also have to point out differences in FGM and male circumcision. The foreskin is cut and the labia are sewn at a young age. The wound where the foreskin heals (usually). I understand there are exceptions. Women have to endure menstruation and in some cases, sex with partially sewn genitals. This is to discourage women from sex altogether, and from extra-marital sex. Neither is more preferable, neither is worse. I am, however, trying to put YOU in perspective. Many understand that it's a hot topic. I don't like it either when women blatantly claim they like cut penises. Pardon the assumptions, but it shows that they are not aware of the tension and ongoing fight against any kind of mutilation. Additionally, I have heard men like yourself speak out about it, and I have also, curiously, heard men who are circumcised say that they don't mind it and actually like it. Now how does that fit into your concrete equation that "male circumcision = evil fucking women" ? At best your arguments are passionate and heartfelt. I appreciate it, and I believe we both disagree with any genital mutilation (without consent). But you're greatly clouded by your anger which seems strangely displaced.
i'm uncut and happy. thankfully, my dad did the research before i was born, and discovered that being cut has almost no medical benefit. although it would be hard to find out for sure, i also beleive uncut males are more sensitive. for example, if you let your fingernails grow out, and then cut them off, your skin that has been covered is extra sensitive for a while. i think the penis is the same way. if the tip is always exposed (as the cut ones are) it just looses some sensitivity. however, the tensions are running way too high in the thread. while i do think it's sickening thinking that baby boys are getting this done without their consent, in most cases, it doesn't screw them up later in life. they don't remember the trauma, or anything like that. to them, it's natural.
