Why do the female MP'S in this country look more smug than the bulk of the males, especially the crooked ones who get caught with their hand in the till(expenses claims etc)Does anyone else think they have an ever greater misplaced sense of entitlement than the men when they behave in this manner.
Not much difference between men and women MPs. With Miller, whose resignation I suspect has provoked this thread, she can afford to look smug because she got away without repaying most of the money she fraudulently claimed.
I was also thinking of the despicable Hazel Blears waving her blamk cheque condescendingly, when she was exposed, and the laughable Jackie Smith. Smugness, "I am strong, i am woman" attitude.Skin crawlingly insincere.
you aint seen smug till u see Marie Rmmer the favourite to win Labours 'only women allowed' selection process in St Helens.
Male MPs, certainly the Cuntservatives and "New Labour" tend to be effeminate creeps, usually closet homosexuals. Like Osbourne, Blair, Hague etc. Then there's a particularly vile form of "female" MP. I'm think Harriet Harman, Teresa May etc. I know the American political women started taking testosterone injections. U can notice the effect its had on Jane Fonda (who yes I know, isnt a politician!) Then you have a diferent type of wacko like Diane Abbott. Harman astounds me. She utterly hates men. Unless they are homosexuals or paedophiles. And that Teresa May and Widdecombe (the 70 yr old virgin) really should be put on bonfires. How the latter can call itself a "Christian" really sickens me. Often its not whether they are Lab or Con or whatever. But the fact that they're usually pretty similar. Different spin on the same shit - like Blair or Camoron. Ultimately its the political class. Same schools, same (lack of) values, same thirst for power, and fondness of their own tedious voices.
