Entangled Phase Transition

https://phys.org/news/2019-07-phase-transition-entangled.html

Assuming we inhabit a multiverse within a singularity, then entangled quanta resemble everything and nothing depending on how many measurements you take, and everything should metamorphose into one another at different rates and in wild variety of different ways. The principle of identity is vanishing down the rabbit hole or toilet of your preference, and even whether quanta are tiny black holes or whatever must inevitably remain a mystery. As much as I'd like to see Jesus' silhouette in a quantum moire pattern, what this experiment shows is they are running out of excuses and ways to categorize quanta, and closing in on the supersymmetry by going straight to the measurement problem. These days, AI are often used to take these kinds of measurements and make sense out of them because, knowing nothing, the AI are smarter and more capable then academics, not to mention, faster and cheaper.

Phase transitions are a more mechanical way to view quanta but, theoretically, with enough measurements they can resemble Dolly Parton if you want.

 

Why would anyone assume we live in a multiverse? Which is a bullshit theory.

 

You can call it The Matrix if you prefer, or pure fucking magic, because it doesn't matter once you start introducing new dimensions and things like time travel. There is even an academically recognized "Pointless Geometry" that studies regions instead of points. However, assuming 42 is as good as it gets, that means that sparkling laughter, the infectious "Santa Claus" laughter, should prove to be more than 100% efficient at conveying any energy and information, reflecting the fact life and even the Big Bang can be interpreted as jokes. In other words, the laws of physics should reflect our mortal fallibility, and inability to see the Big Picture.

We can infer we inhabit a multiverse within a singularity, because nature herself appears to contradict the principle of identity. Mathematically, it means space-time is hyperuniform or homogenized or yin-yang as all the leading theories suggest and the Golden Ratio should turn out to be just right, expressing an outrageously complex multidimensional multifractal symmetry. That's a mouthful, but it means that even nonsense must inevitably make sense to someone.

 

The matrix from the blockbuster sensation "The Matrix" has nothing to do with multiple universes.

How does nature appear to contradict the law of identity, and how can we infer from that that we live in a multiverse? And a sensible answer this time instead of all your fancy wordplay. I don't want to hear anything about 42, Goldilocks, chickens, Mickey Mouse, Donald Duck, or lowbrow slapstick. Just answer the question directly.

The whole reason a multiverse is posited is as an explanation for the collapse of the wave function. And it's a really terrible explanation in my opinion. Everything happens...bullshit. The world isn't constantly replicating itself like a dividing cell for every fathomable possibility. The notion is absurd.

 

no, i think when we observe it and it does one thing, we make it the single objective reality. maybe.

 

Talk to Neo about the Matrix, he knows everything even the others don't. The Matrix and other simulation theories merely beg the question as to whether life is a dream. Insisting life is real, but a simulation of unknown origin in which Neo has magical powers in even the real world, is a bit bizarre.

Quantum mechanics implies 42 is as good as it gets, and the collapse of the wave-function is context dependent. You can insist all you want that life must make sense, but I have a thousand pages that all suggest otherwise. Thus far, it appears that the more quanta you have all lumped together, the more normal they start to behave. The mathematicians and physicists have already demonstrated that causality and logic can emerge from random quantum interactions, as if logic and causality are the inevitable result of nothing ultimately making any damned sense from a mere mortal perspective, and reflect the conscious mind, and wishful thinking, more than the subconscious.

 

That is what happens in my view, Driftrue.

I don't insist anything make sense, woo. That's for the scientists. Just because it's ultimately ineffable doesn't mean that it's branching off into infinitely more universes with each passing moment.

 

It means words themselves only have whatever meaning we choose to give them and, otherwise, can be treated like complete gibberish. Einstein said imagination is more important than knowledge but, if so, its only because without reliable memories, everything is deja vu all over again! My own work addresses what is demonstrable using contextual vagueness, and anyone can improve on it at any time in the public domain. You could say logic describes grammar, and every grammar Nazi relies on logic, while I work on the emotional syntax from which grammar emerges, to deny that it is an emotional response.

 

Oh, but about the multiverse...

 

Nice name for a Indie band.