End of the Dark Knight is such crap!

ok.. for real. if a boat full of prisoners and a boat full of citizens had the chance to blow each other up to save themselves.. OR have the option of both being blown up.. I'm pretty sure somebody would push the button.

a lot of prisoners = bad ass thugs who dont give a shit about killing people

and from the citizens perspective.. they've got to be thinking "We should probly kill them before those guys kill us"

i dont believe for even a second that nobody would push the button.
in fact.. i think people would kill each other in the process of trying to press the button

 

Just curious why you would post this in the Dreadlocks forum? It would fit better into the Movies forum.

 

That movie was soooo 2009! teehee. I hated that movie I think it was all propaganda. Heath Ledger did a good job but the media totally overplayed his role. Plus I think Christian Bale is a douche. I cant stand his voice in that movie! Plus...I dont like how they made Batman into an outlaw type character. Lame-o

 

idk cuz i love my dreadlock buddies? meh.. also there's a lot of unrelated stuff in this forum so i figured why not

 

Thank you for describing why the scene at the end is so tense.

 

Batman was sort of an outlaw in the comics. to be a vigilante is to be a law breaker.

 

This.
The new films weren't the first to make Batman into an outlaw xD It's a pretty common theme in any Superhero story tho....

 

This thread should be moved

*coughcoreymichaelcough*

 

Dont you think that the Joker would have set it so if one boat presses the button they both blow up? it would certainly make for quite the practical "Joke"

 

good work sherlock

it's not like i posted pics on both accounts or anything..
or addressed myself as corey before..

 

Okay dumbass I wasn't calling you him. I was referencing to a post he made months earlier about a movie and then it was moved to the movie forum.

 

this thread


seriously natty, lately your threads have become a little too counter-productive to this part of the forums.

 

In any event you seemed hostile in your first post, which = me

I don't see why I can't talk about movies in a not-movie forum..

Aren't hippies about freedom of speech, liberty, etc etc?

 

either you're having fun under your little bridge or you're just very ignorant.

 

oh Lordie Lordie i'll never make an off-topic post in a hip forums sub forum ever again.


















































































really though <^>( - . - )<^>

 

Lol post it in the off topic thread NattyMojo, just ask yourself is it really worthy of its own thread

 

can do.

also Georges St Pierre is the greatest fighter in the world in my opinion.

 

Pierres is the best welterweight in MMA but not the greatest fighter in the world if he went 1 on 1 with a current welterweight boxer ie, Manny Pacquiao, Miguel Cotto, Joshua Clottey, Floyd Gayweather, Shane Mosley, or any other top 10 for that matter he would get KOed. But if he was allowed to take them to the floor he would submit them easily so i guess it depends on what you dig. He is pretty beast though I dont see him getting beat anytime soon hopefully a fight similar with pac and de la hoya proportions happens with him and Anderson Silva

 

If you were here longer you may understand. It isn't really an attack at you. It's the reason why there is an off topic thread.

 

i think the mistake is assuming that we're all hippies, and another is assuming that all hippies are instantly all about freedom of speech. some hippies are only about freedom of speech that agrees with their ideals, like a lot of people are.


and i thought the batman ending was pretty good (movie is way toooooooo long though), it shows that everyone has a bit of good in them even hardened criminals. it was all about proving the joker wrong when he said that everyone has a dark side yadda yadda yadda.