I do, I don't see any reason why there wouldn't be multiple universes. I've even heard people talk about how they've had past lives in other universes and have memories from there. And then there's people who reality shift to to other universes, sometimes even unintentionally. As soon as someone told me that there are infinite universes, I believed it, because I didn't see any reason why that wouldn't be true. That's what reality shifting is based in, that you can shift to whatever reality you want, decide exactly what you want it to be like and what interactions you want to have and everything, and then it'll happen because there is an infinite amount of universes that have always existed. Although, now I'm starting to doubt that there are infinite universes, because some things don't fit into my logic. Which, theoretically, shouldn't matter because spirituality isn't logical which is why it isn't proved by science. But still, like for example intuition is always correct, right? If you intuitively know something, without your conscious mind getting in the way and changing it, it is correct. So say in another universe, that was also true, and everything about this other universe is exactly the same, except someone's genuine intuition is incorrect, and that? doesn't make sense, y'know? I don't know, maybe that could be possible, like a little glitch in the way things work - maybe you can't say something is "always" or "never". Or what originally got me doubting the idea of infinite universes was that people say to trust that the universe will guide you through whatever you need, that everything happens for a reason, everyone comes into your life for a reason, all that jazz. But with infinite universes, you'll go down an infinite number of life paths, so really how could you say that everything is meant to happen if it happens differently in every universe? I think there's a multiverse, but maybe not an infinite number of universes. Of course, maybe because spirituality is illogical, two opposing concepts can both be true, but right now it feels like I have to give up on one belief to believe the other. Anyway, what do you think?
I think it's risky to believe things just because I don't see any reason not to. I tend to believe things only if there's a good reason to do so. One reason some scientists believe in them is that they might provide a naturalistic explanation for the integrated complexity of our own universe that could otherwise lead folks to believe in God. Providing naturalistic explanations for things is what scientists do. But they also need to come up with falsifiable hypotheses that withstand the test of rigorous empirical testing. That they haven't done. So you can believe in them if you like. You can also believe in unicorns.
Some things we can understand the limits of, because they make sense, for example, temperature can never drop below -273 degrees celcius, because it is a form of energy and at that point the pot is empty. On the other hand, this cannot exist with either distance or time, since there are no fixed points at either end, so we have made up a word "Infinity" that is as incomprehensible. You can just keep saying "Then What". At college, I was supposed to write an essay on the big bang. I handed in 5 words. "Which big bang was that". Rather than the telling off or detention that I expected, the teacher told me that the only thing that he was certain of, was that I would end up as a professor. Put in a nutshell. the human brain is incapable of comprehending infinity. I see that as the only fixed law of the universe. Around 30 years ago, a friend vowed to prove me wrong. He started working a formula out, but it simply became recurring. Sadly, the guy died within 5 years due to liver failure. Towards the end, he wa drinking 2 bottles of whiskey a day. I recalled that teacher who I mentioned telling me that in his opinion attempting to comprehend infinity was the fastest route to the funny farm. Looking to the past, rather than the future. Why did engineers use base 12 and then keep halving until they reached 1 over 960 for measurement and base 16 for weight, halved in the same way. The answer is recurring decimals, or rather lack of them. A whole number after 3 as the divisor is so important, because much of engineering and navigation is broadly based on triangles.