Every day, Trump comes out with another embarrassment. His Tweets, the porn star scandal. Need I go on? But then there are these "leaks" that are even more embarrassing. Bob Woodward of Woodward and Bernstein fame wrote a book. So did another. The allegations made in these books, op-ed's and so forth are shocking and scandalous. The guy is about to start World War III, but for the restraining influence of aids around him. His staff is thinking of invoking the 25th amendment to remove him from office, because he is unfit. These things would be shocking if true. But are they? Aids almost immediately deny the veracity of these claims. Even the disgruntled ones do. My question is, could these leaks be no accident? They may some day be proven to be false. Is that no accident? I mean, could someone in his inner circle be manufacturing them, in an attempt to discredit the media? They supposedly come from an elite inside source. But as I said, they are unproven, and almost always promptly denied. Could I be right about this? And what are the implications if I am?
can you say "smoke screen"? of course they can, and most, it has been widely concluded, almost certainly are. they are the visible hand of the illusionist, to keep attention away from what the other hand is doing. (which however hard to imagine that could be worse, it is.)
