Corona Virus Testing

Discussion in 'U.K. Politics' started by Vladimir Illich, May 22, 2020.

  1. Vladimir Illich

    Vladimir Illich Lifetime Supporter Lifetime Supporter

    Messages:
    12,471
    Likes Received:
    10,032
    Matt hancock trumpeted that he had met his own 100,000 tests per day at the end of April. Turns out that that target was met only by the numbers of tests being sent out (not actually tested). Now it transpires that thousands of those tests sent out, have never been returned, so the figure for tests actually completed is significantly below the 100,000 that Matt Hancock stated. In other words HE LIED !!!


    • Up to half of government coronavirus home tests never returned, officials admit
      Testing tsar can confirm only half have been sent back to labs


      [​IMG]
      The head of the testing programme says the Department of Health told them how to count the tests ( Getty )
      Significant numbers of home-testing kits sent out under the government’s Covid-19 programme are not being used, officials have admitted.

      Throwing fresh doubt on the government’s figures, the UK’s testing tsar on Friday admitted that the number of kits being sent back was not as high as health authorities would like and said steps were being taken to increase the rate.

      Last month, ministers faced criticism that Britain was lagging behind the rest of the world in testing. The government rapidly increased the daily number of tests, relying heavily on home-testing kits.

      But home tests are counted in the government’s figures as soon as they are put in the post, meaning that if they are not being returned, many of those recorded will never have taken place.

      John Newton of Public Health England, who runs the testing programme, told the Commons Science and Technology Select Committee that officials at Matt Hancock’s Department of Health had “advised” his operation to count tests in this way.


      “The way tests were counted was discussed with officials in the Department of Health,” he told MPs. “We were advised by officials at the Department of Health on an appropriate method of counting the tests and that’s what we did.”

      Mr Hancock’s department struggled to meet its target of testing 100,000 people before the beginning of May, and only did so by counting a huge number of tests mailed out in one day.

      On the day of the deadline alone, 40,000 kits were posted out to homes and satellite test centres. The latter are not thought to face a problem with test returns.

      Asked what proportion of posted tests were actually sent back, Professor Newton told MPs he did not have a ready figure but estimated it as “more than half”.

      “To begin with, a relatively... I think something like... certainly more than half. We would like to get that amount up,” he said.

      “I’m afraid I don’t have that figure, but it can be provided by the programme, I’m sure.” He promised to write to MPs after the hearing to provide the figure.
      The government has also been asked about test returns, and this week provided an equally vague answer.

      Lord Bethell, a health minister, said in a written answer to a parliamentary question that “a majority” of home test kits are returned – again meaning more than 50 per cent.

      “The majority of home test kits are returned, and the ratio of kits being returned is on an upward trajectory,” he said in a written answer to another peer, declining to provide the requested figure.


      The Independent has contacted both the Department of Health and Public Health England to ask for the exact figure but has not yet received a response.

      In other testing confusion, the Daily Telegraph reports that tens of thousands of coronavirus tests have been counted twice. Saliva and nasal samples from the same person have been recorded as two tests, the newspaper says.

      Shadow health secretary Jonathan Ashworth said of the revelation: “Ministers have already received an embarrassing slap on the wrists for their dodgy spin on testing figures. It seems they haven’t learnt their lesson. We need absolute transparency in the presentation of these figures.”
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice