Communism & NWO: Wall Street's Utopian Hoax

Discussion in 'Communism' started by Pressed_Rat, Feb 12, 2007.

  1. Pressed_Rat

    Pressed_Rat Do you even lift, bruh?

    Communism & NWO: Wall Street's Utopian Hoax

    By Henry Makow Ph.D.
    March 16, 2003


    Bella Dodd was a leader of the Communist Party of America (CPUSA) in the 1930' s and 1940's. Her book, "School of Darkness" (1954) reveals that Communism was a hoax perpetrated by financiers "to control the common man" and to advance world tyranny. Naturally this important book is out-of-print and not in any used bookstores. (I found it through interlibrary loan.)

    Bella Dodd was born Maria Asunta Isabella Visono in Italy about 1904. A brilliant and dedicated woman, she graduated from Hunter College and NYU Law School. She became head of the New York State Teachers Union and was a member of the CPUSA's National Council until 1949.

    Dodd describes Communism as "a strange secret cult" whose goal is the destruction of Western (i.e. Christian) Civilization. Millions of naïve idealists ("innocents") are tricked by its talk of helping the poor, but it cares only for power. For example, Dodd found there was no social research at party headquarters. "We are a revolutionary party, not a reform party," she was told. (163)


    The Communist Party operates by infiltrating and subverting social institutions like the churches, schools, mass media and government. Its aim was "to create new types of human beings who would conform to the blueprint of the world they confidently expected to control." (162)

    For example, Dodd reveals that the CPUSA had 1100 members become Catholic priests in the 1930's. It also subverted the American education system by taking over the teacher's unions and learned societies. Only people who accepted the "materialistic, collectivistic international class struggle approach" advanced. (98)

    Involving women in the war effort fitted the long-range program:

    "The party did all it could to induce women to go into industry. Its fashion designers created special styles for them and its songwriters wrote special songs to spur them.... War-period conditions, they planned, were to become a permanent part of the future educational program. The bourgeois family as a social unit was to be made obsolete." (153)

    There was to be no family but the party and the state. Dodd helped organize the Congress of American Women, a forerunner of the feminist movement.

    "Since it was supposedly a movement for peace, it attracted many women. But it was really only a renewed offensive to control American women... Like youth and minority groups, they are regarded as a reserve force of the revolution because they are more easily moved by emotional appeals." (194-195)


    When FDR recognized Russia in 1933, he deliberately turned a blind eye to the CPUSA's massive program of espionage and subversion. Liberals denied that this took place and complained about a "witch hunt." Guess what? The "loony right" was correct. A new book (The Secret World of American Communism, based on newly opened Kremlin archives, confirms that CPUSA was a puppet of Moscow and the Roosevelt and Truman administrations were practically run by Soviet agents, Alger Hiss, Harry Hopkins and Harry Dexter White to name a few.

    The war years saw the CPUSA actually renounce the class struggle and join the so-called "Roosevelt camp of progress" which included "progressive capitalists."

    "The Communist Party now assumed the responsibility of establishing a rigid discipline over the working class. No employer was more effective or more relentless in checking strikes among the workers, or minimizing complaints...while wages rose a little during those years, they did not compare with the rise in profits and in monopoly control of basic necessities...war production was chiefly in the hands of ten large corporations...the Communists carefully muted such information." (153)

    The war years saw amazing coordination between the Communist Party and America's financial elite. The elite financed a sophisticated propaganda agency called the Russian Institute located on Park Ave. across 68th Street from Rockefeller's Council on Foreign Relations. Here "famous names like Vanderbilt, Lamont, Whitney and Morgan mingled with those of Communist leaders. "(153)

    At Roosevelt's insistence, Stalin "dissolved" the Comintern in order to make the CPUSA look like an American party. The CPUSA leader Earl Browder achieved national prominence and consulted with senior Roosevelt cabinet ministers.

    The joint US-Russian war effort was to be the basis of the new world order. But, inexplicably, the policy changed and Browder instantly became a non-person. Apparently the financial elite had decided the time wasn't right for world government. A cold war would be much more lucrative. Dodd was told that in the future, the party would often find itself opposed not only to the government, but also to U.S. workers.

    "I now saw that with the best motives and a desire to serve the working people... I and thousands like me, had been led to a betrayal of these very people.... I had been on the side of those who sought the destruction of my own country." (229)

    Like frightened mice, the CPUSA membership scurried to adopt the new party line. Dodd tried to quit but was told: "No one gets out of the party. You die or you are thrown out." (197)

    Eventually Dodd was expelled and smeared as "anti-Negro, anti-Puerto Rican, anti-Semitic, anti-labor and a defender of the landlord." (220). Sound familiar? After more than 20 year of tireless sacrifice, she was without family or friends. The party had been her family. Its "hates had become my hates."

    "This is the key to the mental enslavement of mankind. The individual is made into nothing ... he operates as the physical part of [a] higher group intelligence... he has no awareness of the plans the higher group intelligence has for utilizing him." (158)


    Bella Dodd was circumspect about the people behind the Communist Party. She once was told to phone two multi-millionaires who live in the Waldorf Towers if she lost contact with Moscow. Elsewhere, she refers to "a secret well organized world power." She is obviously afraid to be candid. She suspects that one CPUSA leader's "suicide" was in fact murder. (172)

    But she does drop a possible clue. She says that each of the nine floors of the party-owned headquarters at 35 E. 12th St. was devoted to CPUSA business. The Sixth Floor held "the publication offices of the Yiddish newspaper, the Freiheit, and the "Jewish Commission." (162) Indeed Jews were prominent among Communist dupes.

    "What now became clear to me was the collusion of these two forces: the Communists with their timetable for world control, and certain mercenary forces in the free world bent on making profits from blood." (229)

    As "one piece of the puzzle that finally became a picture," Dodd tells the story of the ship "Erica Reed" typical of "hundreds of other stories." During the Spanish Civil War, Americans donated money to load the ship with medical supplies and food for Spain. The Communists diverted the ship to Russia instead. (89)

    Censorship is crucial to Communists, Dodd says. "I have often seen leaders pull books from shelves in homes and warn members to destroy them."(223)

    Communism is essentially a deceitful system of international elite control. It was not suppressed during the McCarthy era. Rather it morphed into the New Left, Counter Culture, Civil Rights, Anti War and Woman's Liberation Movements, and later into a plethora of elite-sponsored NGO's, and media, Democratic and Republican party factions, Liberal, Zionist, Labor, and Gay Rights groups. Like the CPUSA itself, these groups are controlled from the top so their memberships are unaware of being used.

    To the objection that some of the above mentioned groups oppose globalization, Dodd refers to examples where the CPUSA ostensibly supported causes they wished to sabotage. (205)

    In conclusion, Communism was/is a plot designed to substitute a cabal of the rich for the rule of God. It is a utopian fraud hatched by the rich to thwart the dreams of ordinary people and stunt human progress. The same cabal is behind most wars including the impending attack on Iraq.

    A precursor to the new world order, Communism espouses brotherhood, peace and equality in order to deceive us. It has taken over society's eyes, ears, mind and spirit. Much of what passes for truth in the media and schools is part of this monstrous con job. The expression "politically correct" in widespread use in America is an old Communist Party term. Our politicians are mostly traitors.

    Feminism is Communist both in origin and spirit. It pretends to champion women but in fact neuters both sexes and destroys the basic social unit, the family. The promotion of homosexuality as a "lifestyle choice" for heterosexuals is also part of this brazen elitist fraud designed to "create new types of human beings who would conform..."

    Western Civilization is like a ship floundering in a sea of evil, yet the passengers are too duped and distracted to realize it. Bella Dodd had the courage to sound the alarm 50 years ago. It is never too late to begin to resist tyranny.

    There are no lifeboats.
  2. Pepik

    Pepik Banned

    Its funny you can't figure out that these conspiracy theories are written by extreme right loons. Feminism and homosexuality are communist conspiracies? The civil rights movement was a communist conspiracy? And don't forget jew hating, with the mandatory reference to the prominence of jews as dupees.

    Of all the garbage you post here, savethemales really is the worst.
  3. Pressed_Rat

    Pressed_Rat Do you even lift, bruh?

    The author of that article, Henry Makow, is a Jew. So your "anti-semitic" nonsense isn't going to work this time. Asshole.
  4. Green

    Green Iconoclastic

    Theres this Jew joke where if you ask 4 Jews the same question you will get 5 different opinions.
  5. Pepik

    Pepik Banned

    Why don't you just say it loud an proud Rat? Whether Makow is really a jew or not hardly matters, you are promoting anti-semetic conspiracy theories.

    Its amazing that all anyone has to do is replace the word "jew" with "zionist" and you are a willing dupe.
  6. Pressed_Rat

    Pressed_Rat Do you even lift, bruh?

    I frankly don't give a flying fuck whether you think it's anti-semitic or not. I think you're a fucking douche bag, so there. Zionism and Judaism are two seperate things, and if you think otherwise then maybe you should become a little more informed. I am sick of this bullshit that if you criticise zionism, you're an anti-semite. Give me a fucking break!
  7. Pepik

    Pepik Banned

    All I'm saying is that if someone took an anti-semetic conspiracy theory, replaced the word "jew" with the word "zionist", would anyone fall for it?

    You are proof that the answer is yes.

    Now shall we talk about your hatred of feminists and gays?

    This "neither right not left" politics you've discovered looks a lot like the right to me.
  8. Piney

    Piney Lifetime Supporter Lifetime Supporter


    I wouldn't think that Capitalists would be promoting Communism.
    With all of the confiscations of property and such.

    Miami Fla is full of people who had property & posessions confiscated
    in places like Argentina, Cuba and Venezula.
  9. Pressed_Rat

    Pressed_Rat Do you even lift, bruh?

    What do you think communism is? It entails taking a person's property and putting it in state control. Why do you think communists are against private property rights? Because communism is all about state ownership of EVERYTHING. Confiscation of property is a perfect example of communist fascism.
  10. lifelovefun

    lifelovefun Member

    That's pretty nuts! But it makes a lot of sense :) If you look around the world EVERYTHING is about money, fame, and "controlled sex" (controlled meaning that when someone brings up the idea of free love and polyamory they are insulted because of the religious and now societal norms).

    Hell, why did the news cover this whole BS about Paris Hilton going to jail? Because its all about fame, money, and controlled sex.
  11. heywood floyd

    heywood floyd Banned

    Communist fascism???! That's a big oxymoron!

    Communism and fascism are in direct opposition to each other-- that's why they're on opposite ends of the political spectrum...

    You can have a communist dictatorship-- it's called the dictatorship of the proletariat-- but it only happens IF power is seized through a revolution. And it is supposed to exist only on the basis that the dictators represent the working class, and are properly serving proletariat, and not bourgeois interests-- basically, they want the dissolution of the class system and the dissolution of the capitalist exploitation that perpetuates it.

    Yes, communists want a change in human nature... and it's no secret that they don't believe in families-- if only because families involve nepotism, which is a form of inequality. Also, the state is supposed to be your family... and everyone is a brother or 'comrade'.

    Under true communism, the people own equal shares of all businesses, effectively negating the current 'free enterprise' power structure which helps the rich get richer, and maintains the hierarchical structure.

    Under communism, the state ensures that all the wealth is distributed evenly-- so yes, the state has control, but the communist state serves only to equalize the living conditions of all its citizens by whatever means necessary... and that means it involves taking from the rich and giving to the poor... basically, 'stealing' money and property from those who have too much and giving some of it to those who don't have enough.

    After that, all the seized wealth flows back to the people through social programs. Everyone gets free housing, free health care, free food, free cable TV... and maybe some luxuries as well. That's the whole point!

    So of course there will be a confiscation of property-- that's because we're now living in a society where things are definitely NOT equal, and there's a huge difference between rich and poor. True communism would involve a massive reshaping of the country... instead of some people living in shitholes smaller than a closet while their neighbours live in eloquent mansions, both neighbours would ideally get to live in a happy medium somewhere between the two. Basically, the aim of communism is to create a universal middle class.

    However under fascism, the state enforces their will through military might-- you're either with them or against them... the difference is that the ruling party controls everything, and says who gets what. If they don't like you, you live in a closet. If they like you, you live in a mansion. If you're high society, you keep getting richer as long as you stay in their good books and don't argue with what they give you or ask you to do. So under fascism, you get a very few people with wonderful mansions and swimming pools-- they're called 'the party members'. Also, there are people who are in ghettoes, in jail, or about to be shot-- they're called 'the non-party members'. The rule is 'suck up and take what they give you, because only the strongest survive, and might makes right'.

    So really, the two are very different from each other.
  12. Pressed_Rat

    Pressed_Rat Do you even lift, bruh?

    Wrong. You were taught in school that communism and fascism are different, when their outcomes have always been exactly the same. There is no difference. Communism is fascism and vice versa.

    What was the difference between Hitler and Stalin, other than that Stalin killed a lot more people?

    You are putting too much emphasis on labels. You shouldn't.

    Wrong. It's about making everyone a peasant, with a small few at the top lording over everyone else. Haven't you studied history at all? You are confusing pro-communist rhetoric with reality.

    So what happened under Stalin and Mao? How did the state enforce its will then? With flowers? Did Stalin kill people with laughter?

    In order for communism to work, the military must always enforce the rule of the state with brute force, enslaving and killing millions. That's the only way they have ever gotten people to go along with that system. If you are unwilling to give up your property or submit to their rule, you are killed. That's proven with history.

    There is absolutely NO DIFFERENCE between nazism and communism. None whatsoever!
  13. heywood floyd

    heywood floyd Banned

    Like most discussions, it comes down to a question of semantics.

    I was referring to the original form of communism, proposed by Marx... not the distortion applied in the USSR. That form WAS more like fascism... so I don't know how anyone could consider that to have been a real communist society.

    Communism isn't supposed to be about small groups controlling everything, it's supposed to be about those groups distributing everything in a fair pattern... so it's not a big free-for-all and whoever climbs to the top first wins.

    It's hardly worthwhile to use the USSR as an excuse to dismiss communism as a failure... especially since it's probably the best ideology we have at this time... and because I think that capitalism has definitely evolved into its 'fetter' stage.

    In a REAL communist society, there would be no Bill Gates-- MOST of 'his' money would be put back into schools and health care-- and with all that money, things would definitely improve dramatically.

    Right now, if he and the rest of the world's wealthiest got together, they could easily end world hunger, improve living conditions for everyone, end war and poverty, and make sure that everyone gets a decent education. The reason that they don't do that right now is simply because they don't HAVE to... and they don't want to, because they're used to a certain standard of living, and because they like having the power and the control.

    Also, you wouldn't have so much goddam waste. You wouldn't have people fucking off so much because they won the contract and they were given the money so the hard part's over and they can get paid a fortune to do things as slowly and inefficiently as possible. Why does someone spend millions of dollars on Fantastic Four 2 when they could have taken that money and improved the quality of education for thousands??? But that's the way that people are in capitalist society--instead of learning, we want big flashy spectacles which have basically the same effect as pornography, but we get upset when our government shows nothing but contempt for us.

    Honestly, as long as we keep standing in line for the movies, none of us have any right to be upset.
  14. jneil

    jneil Member

    Actually they would have to get rid of the poorer countries dictators to be able to distribute the money to save the poor.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice