building what??

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hHIj9wzbYGQ"]YouTube - Help Put This Ad On Air - Go to BuildingWhat.org

http://buildingwhat.org/

 

i'm bumping this thread.. checkout the eyewitness accounts on that website...

 

Im not clicking links or visiting sites full of retards who think its unusual for a third building to be structurally compromised when it stands in the shadow of two 110 storey building that just collapsed next to it

 

it's not a third building its a 7th building. further displaying the point that no one knows about this building.

some people heard a countdown on the radio "3,2,1" and boom boom boom before the building that sustained minimal damage goes into a free fall precisely in its footprint. engineers and architects say no way.

the two world trade center towers may very well have gone down in the same manner.

 

Great link; I really like this project. Pretty brilliant way to introduce people to the world of figuring out what actually happened, honestly. Pick one thing that makes absolutely no sense and ask for an objective look at it...then let the people with common sense do their research and find out how many other things about that day don't add up.

 

Machinist got to this link sometime

http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com/

and watch the movie dated in 2007. Then the others if you want. It talks about everything.

The designers of the World trade center say that the buildings were built to withstand several plane crashes. The metal and steal that they used cant be burnt down from fire. Including any known fuel.

 

not entirely stable..

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jODfN8oZWe0&feature=related"]YouTube - WTC witnesses, firefighters, Naudet

 

It could be a scam!

 

Easily the most cohesive presentation of these world events portraying a directed plan and end goal I have seen thus far.
Don't accept the mark of the Beast!

Quote from Nicholas Rockefeller;
“The ultimate goal is to get everybody in this world chipped with an RFID chip.” And to have all the money to be on those chips, and everything on those chips. And if anybody wants to protest what we do or violate what we want, we just turn off their chip.”

Does kind of make me take a different look at New Testament prophecies about The Mark.

Rev 13:16-17
He also forced everyone, small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on his right hand or on his forehead, so that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of his name.

Even if Christianity is a plagerized religion, shit like the above makes you wonder.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z1638VqvDe8&feature=related"]YouTube - Cat Stevens - Morning Has Broken

I hear this song coming from the catholic church over the ways. on a quiet Sunday morning, you can hear the PA system faintly ..

 

Pass the film on if you can. There are several quotes from some people that is down right scary.

"If you control a nations money supply, I care not who runs its laws"

glad you enjoyed.

 

The twin towers were designed to withstand a direct hit by a 707 sized aircraft, low on fuel, lost in the fog, trying to find a place to land. Just like that bomber that crashed into the Empire State Building back in the 40's. They were not designed to stand up to a fully fueled jumbo jet flying at full speed directly into the side of the building. There were no jumbo jets in the air when the WTC was designed and they never imagined that someone would crash into it on purpose.

 

Uhmm, yeah I'm sure that is what they were thinking when designing it.
According to comments by the actual architects, it was designed to withstand at mutiple plane hits, and every one of the architects involved that were available for comment said there is no way a single plane could have brought the towers down.

 

Already have. I even told the Jehovah Witness' that came to my door today to look it up, because they were talking about 9/11.

I have heard every single one of the theories put forth in that film, just never in such an intelligent and cohesive manner that traced events through history as that film did. There are still some questions, but I am always more open to listening when someone openly reveals their sources as he did with the companion pdf.

The Rockefeller quotes were the most damning/upsetting.

 

I don't think I ever posted this clip.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sO1JxpVb2eU"]YouTube - Frank A. DeMartini

I did suggest before that a model test would give good insight to how the buildings would react to such fires with such structure damage.

It would be good if more people made scale models of the buildings, both towers and #7. The claim by Myth Busters is that it is too hard for them to make an accurate model to get a good result (they proved nasa walked on the moon). I do see how a flame cannot be changed in size like a model's structural members can be more precise transposing load bearing capabilities.

The computer generated sequences just seem compensated.

It seems to me no matter how many times model tests could be built and burned not one would ever blast apart the way the towers did or fall the way 7 did even with its gash and sprinkler system disabled (this may be another problem for Myth Busters) .

 

Then why did they design so much of the load bearing structure of the towers into the outer skin? The World Trade Center was not designed like a normal skyscraper. The skin was not just a outer skin, it actually helped hold the entire building up. They built it like that so the floor plan could be more open without all the walls and support beams every twenty or thirty feet.

And once again, what kind of planes and at what speed did the architects think they would be traveling when they crashed?

 

general rule of thumb in engineering is to build at least 1.5 to 2 times as strong as it is planned to have to deal with.. the wtc was finished around 1970. at that time, the biggest airplane was the boeing 747

 

Watch the movie broony linked to, the above video as well as a lot of the associated videos.
I'm no expert, but the experts that have commented say it was a planned, controlled demolition, especially building #7.
In the above video he even said it would withstand mutiple hits.
And the main support beam structure within the building would not have collapsed if it happened the way the "official" story contends.
Check it out for yourself.

 

I will accept that, considering your a friggin engineer and are continuing your education in engineering.