Breakup of the Beatles

Discussion in 'Rock 'n' Roll' started by Bocks, Oct 10, 2005.

  1. Bocks

    Bocks Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,071
    Likes Received:
    5
    Was the breakup of the Beatles, in your opinion, a good thing or a bad thing?
    Should they have gone on into eternity, like (cough, cough, Stones) others of their "generation" have, or just quit while they were ahead, so to speak? Could they have posssibly gotten even BETTER by not breaking up? If they were still together (and all alive), would you still go to the concerts? Whaddya think?
     
  2. rubytuesday

    rubytuesday Member

    Messages:
    283
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think the breakup was meant to be. However, if they had concentrated all of their energies on cooperating, and continued into the present as the Beatles, I would definitely still go to their concerts. It's very unusual to think of the Beatles as anything but a '60s band. Just imagine what their '80s albums would be like!

    *shock, horror*

    *remembers what Dylan's '80s albums were like...*
     
  3. alice_d_millionaire

    alice_d_millionaire Just Do It©

    Messages:
    3,927
    Likes Received:
    5
    yep... what señor rube said... eek
     
  4. rubytuesday

    rubytuesday Member

    Messages:
    283
    Likes Received:
    0
    I ain't no senor, hun.
     
  5. TheLizardQueen

    TheLizardQueen horny for knowledge

    Messages:
    2,148
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think that if they did stay together, their music would have sucked. They were miserable and tired of each other, and that would have reflected in their music. Instead, they went on to have prosperous solo careers, each one going in their own direction and doing their own thing.
     
  6. Love Fest1969

    Love Fest1969 Classic Rocker

    Messages:
    1,295
    Likes Received:
    2
    I think that if they were still together they would still be the greatest band of all times and all their new material would of been lovely, and if I had the money I would have went to all of their New York concerts.
     
  7. rubytuesday

    rubytuesday Member

    Messages:
    283
    Likes Received:
    0
    Is that...Paul in your sig pic? (I find it hard to believe). Whoever he is, he is very, very cute.
     
  8. Burbot

    Burbot Dig my burdei

    Messages:
    11,608
    Likes Received:
    0
    well john couldn't have done his artsy stuff [and he basically retired in the mid 70's anyways]...george couldnt have done his Krishna songs, which are awesome in their own special little way...and Paul was stil Paul...Ringo, well, he wouldnt have had as much stuff to do cause many of his songs were written for him...but the closest thing to a Beatles reunion was the "Ringo" album, some of the songs have 3 of them on it, usually without Paul or John
     
  9. soulrebel51

    soulrebel51 i's a folkie.

    Messages:
    19,473
    Likes Received:
    7
    i imagine that they still had enough good material for another 2 or 3 albums.. just look at the solo albums that came out shortly after their demise (john/paul/george, anyway).

    but i wouldnt want it any other way. they wouldnt be "The Beatles" as we know them had they kept on going.
     
  10. alice_d_millionaire

    alice_d_millionaire Just Do It©

    Messages:
    3,927
    Likes Received:
    5
    well then... señorita... or at least fellow human :p
     
  11. rubytuesday

    rubytuesday Member

    Messages:
    283
    Likes Received:
    0
    That's better.
    :)
     
  12. Mind Gardens

    Mind Gardens Member

    Messages:
    290
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yeah, they had some good stuff shortly after breaking up. But, we wouldn't have "How Do You Sleep". I also find it hard to picture "Cold Turkey", "Working Class Hero", and "God" on a Beatles album.
     
  13. JanaXGIRL

    JanaXGIRL Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,609
    Likes Received:
    1
    they had to break up.. each one was too good to be in band.

    - my opinion.
     
  14. stoney69

    stoney69 Member

    Messages:
    747
    Likes Received:
    0
    and in my opinion, it was a given ..they had to do what they did to make way for the world to shift the focus from beatles' imaginary status to see


    .............THE GREATEST BAND EVER (not just rock n roll) ..the rollin fuckin stones!
     
  15. Bocks

    Bocks Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,071
    Likes Received:
    5
    To each his own...[​IMG]
     
  16. soulrebel51

    soulrebel51 i's a folkie.

    Messages:
    19,473
    Likes Received:
    7
    yeah yeah, lets hear an album filled with songs about how good they thought they were.. "its only rock n roll," well, thats all it shoulda been ;)
     
  17. LaylaSkye_Loves_Geo

    LaylaSkye_Loves_Geo Member

    Messages:
    226
    Likes Received:
    0
    It's depressing that they broke up, but if they hadn't I would never have gotten "All Things Must Pass"!

    George, as usual, would've had a measely 2 (maybe 3 if they were feeling generous) tracks per album. We'd never get to hear gems like "My Sweet Lord" or "Give Me Love (Give Me Peace on Earth)" because John was too cynical and Paul too pop-centric to allow songs like that on a Beatle record.

    Plus there'd be no Concert for Bangladesh...and because of that maybe no Live Aid and etc. in the future.

    There are a few Paul solo albums that I really enjoy, but mostly I'm just thankful the Beatles split up so George could really prove his strength and talent as a songwriter.

    ~Layla
     
  18. Jim

    Jim Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,005
    Likes Received:
    6
    I think George had already "proved" himself as a songwriter.. When you've written songs like Something and Here Comes The Sun, you've definitely got "talent" ...
     
  19. hippiewise

    hippiewise Member

    Messages:
    487
    Likes Received:
    2
    it was sad when the beatles broke up, but then i realized it was just like a marriage, sometimes you outgrow one another. and i feel each of the beatles wanted to express their true personalities and search out new frontiers. i loved the fact that george became very spiritual and more confident, john became the peace lover, they all needed to be separate from one another to explore new ground. they had been together since they were just young teens. but the beatles were unbelievable and i loved the way their music changed from their innocent years to the "magical mystery tour" years.
    angel
     
  20. Bocks

    Bocks Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,071
    Likes Received:
    5
    ...to their White Album and Abbey Road years...
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice