Believing in periodic work is believing in the Prophet.

Mohammed was born in some uncertain time after the Empire had crumbled and the society of Northern Africa began it's own slow recovery to science and progress for science thinking about a better more moral approach.

We must understand the progress of science along with it's innate amazing life saving ideas. The dark ages have descended upon the region of the Mediterranean. And still people have cunning and clever ways and ideas to shape the customs and means for fame and knowledge in the substance to work at-hand. We just need to believe the message from previous history, from the earlier Biblical prophets. But can such believing accompany our beliefs in the valued compartments of life-style and shear survival.

So are our beliefs in the periodic cycles of the work-a-day worth the accompaniment of what was the other thing, our good faith in moral precedence.

That is ridiculous. All moral precedence shows the conflict of interest: being moral at work is not necessarily doing good work, not even such morality defines any confident judgement that good be from God, justified of clever ordinary common sense for goodness. Morals at work well are accustomed at a balance between "good" and "bad".

So what does the prophet Mohammed ultimately claim? It is not ordinary good faith to trust. It is easy to see that we trust -- in Allah or the unseen God of progress to realize for the truth of the praxis of Science. Social work goes well with technical work; and therefore the understanding of sociology should go well with the understanding of natural science.

Love conquers the means of production and creativity. This is what Mohammed claimed.:sifone: