Ban The Blunt

Discussion in 'Cannabis Legal and Security Issues' started by Piney, Dec 17, 2011.

  1. Piney

    Piney Lifetime Supporter Lifetime Supporter

    Messages:
    5,163
    Likes Received:
    709
    Hi everybody:

    Heard on the radio yesterday that NJ Senator Frank Lautenburg has introuced a bill in Congress to prompt the Food & Drug Admin to ban the sales of " Flavored Cigars"

    Seems Ol Frank is concerned that junior is gonna be tempted to spark up a strawberry flava stogie, an maybee puke!

    Amazing, we have a huge budget deficit and a Supercomitee failure and this guy wants to expand burecuratic power to ban flavored cigars.

    oh well....... back to Dutchie Palmas


    :sifone:
     
  2. RooRshack

    RooRshack On Sabbatical

    Messages:
    11,036
    Likes Received:
    550
    Yeah, not the first time though MAYBE the first federal time.

    Pathetic. And probably, as before, just an attack on weed smoking. However will I smoke marijuana, without flavored cigars?
     
  3. eatlysergicacid

    eatlysergicacid Creep in a T-Shirt

    Messages:
    1,762
    Likes Received:
    4
    Such a dumb idea. That said, I wouldn't mind at all. I would actually prefer if there were no flavors and I could just get unflavored blunts anywhere. Unflavored are the best because you can actually taste the weed.
     
  4. RooRshack

    RooRshack On Sabbatical

    Messages:
    11,036
    Likes Received:
    550
    Flavored blunts are a first step, because it sounds so much more kid-friendly or whatever to ban flavored cigars. Yours will go next, using the rationale that most cigars from those cheap brands have already been banned.

    And if you don't want to taste a blunt, why the FUCK would you smoke that tar filled, kinda nasty, lung clogging shit? Get a pack of zig-zags.
     
  5. eatlysergicacid

    eatlysergicacid Creep in a T-Shirt

    Messages:
    1,762
    Likes Received:
    4
    I like the taste of a natural leaf cigar wrap. I think it complements good weed well. I like the taste more than joint paper. Also its bigger than a normal joint, and im not great at rolling the king sized papers. The biggest reason is that I can roll a blunt that burns slow and even consistently, and with my joints its kind of hit or miss. There's just something about smoking a fat blunt to the dome that I really love. If I could afford it I would smoke blunts more than anything else.
     
  6. RooRshack

    RooRshack On Sabbatical

    Messages:
    11,036
    Likes Received:
    550
    Well then you better mind an attack on your right to buy any type of cigar you please. It's a "when they can for the whatevers, I said nothing" type of situation.

    Also, a joint rolled with two or three normal zig-zags is better than a king size. Cones are excellent because they don't fall apart or hemorrhage weed into your mouth, but draw nicely, and have MASSIVE cherries. But only zig-zags or raws, you need the watermarked papers, other ones have to be "fire safe", which is not lung safe.
     
  7. smokinIVXX

    smokinIVXX Banned

    Messages:
    369
    Likes Received:
    0
    cud be on attack on tobacco companies....they make all the money from these blunts..
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice