At the end of history...

What will the dominant form of government be like?

 

when self dicipline has become universal
all forms of government will atrophy from lack of need for them

=^^=
.../\...

 

themnax, i agree, rules and laws create crime, at least that is what Lao Tzu said, and I agree. If we all got along, and showed each other the proper respect and fairness, there would be no need.

 

i voted anarchy, cuz i believe people are getting fuckin sick and tired of people we don't know telling us how we should live.
it has been prophesied that there will be an upcoming outrage of people who cannot and will not stand for it. in a way, i hope it comes a fact.

 

of course, on the other hand, at the very end, I actually feel it is very likely that there will be a short, very bloody, period of anarchy when logic kicks in and people realize that love and survival are no longer commensurable, as the resources become more scarce. Murders will skyrocket because, logically, if you know you won't get caught, and your neighbor has food, and you don't, no one is watching and the justice system is overwhelmed already, isn't is logical to go get that food for your kids, and then to ensure you are not found guilty, kill all the witnesses and destroy any evidence.
Sounds harsh, I know, but then Hitler, and Stalin were both very logical.

 

logical, yes, but, anarchy has been misconceived since the begining of anarchy. it really isn't about violence, unfortunately, it has been turned into it. and yea, hitler and stalin had great, logical ideas, they just went a little haywire...okay alot haywire!!!

 

The regulations that we continue to impose actually increase crime, I believe.
The difference with traditional anarchist cultures and the very near future is the population density, and the scarcity of basic survival resources. That is my picture, too many mouths, not enough food. Studies done with rats showed that density was critically important in determining whether they lived in harmony or not. They showed a pattern of excessive killing when kept too close together, where they did not stop once they reached the lower density level that was peaceful. They killed until there were very few left, and this was done with abundant food available for all of them. We won't have that. So, it will be interesting to see how we fare.

lallalalala alalalalaal llllllllllllaaaaaaaaaaa

 

democracy is a lie! spreading it only furthers us from the truth

 

At the end of history....that sounds really weird to me, the endo of history. hmmmmm

 

The way the Bible explains it... more communisticly controlled

 

I think, as in, the evolution of organisms the only thing that nature ordianed to be the purpose of life, was the preservation of our own genetic material through both selfish self-preservation and the altruistic care for kin. Now, in this age where genetic evolution has given way to societal and historical evolution, the equivalent of "evolving lifeforms" is the evolution of social ideas that may one day be implemented for material progress, the equivalent of "genetic material" is information, the DNA of ideas, and the only thing society ordains to be the purpose of interpersonal organization is the preservation of information through a "family" that shares the idea, or otherwise the idea will be destroyed by hostile "predators". Just like the case for "care of kin", ideological "families" will nurture those ideas and serve it as if it was their purpose in life-- and the "ideological family" will function as an organismic whole. Although most ideas and "ideological families" will survive, only the one that is the strongest will dominate. And with promise science has already shown, we can be be pretty confident that the strongest ideas will be the most scientific ones.

Scientific Fascism, it shall be.

 

ditto

 

I say socialism....but it's not up there....

 

i stick to organismiscientism

 

Anarchy is impossible as there will always be someone who feels they should be in charge...

 

That makes no sense whatsoever to me. What if lots of people feel they should be in charge? And so what, do they just get to be in charge then? I see chaos once the biomass reaches a critically low level, and the masses are unable to afford food.

 

...the sun will grow into a red giant consume the inner and outer planets and this will be the end... Glad I won't be around!

 

What I mean is eventually groups will form, and will try to take power... Many people would be content to govern themselves, but there will always be those who think their way is the only way...

 

at the end of the world, it will be very fucked up and nobody will care a bout government anymore, it we be in a state of total anarchy everyone for eveyone or in small families.

 

I voted Anarchy too. More towards a de:evolution though, we will join the wild. Like all the poor animals on this planet, were to stupid to value our community and we just kill each other, try going out into the forest with a group of people, killing them off and then see how you can fend for yourself. Its ridiculous. However always out of Anarchy comes feudalism. Its the only answer because a family can't do shit for themselves. Imagine if anarchy were to brake out in New York, all the drug and gang kingpins, rise to the top. We would just be a country of gangs. You follow whoever has the weapons, because in turn weapons will mean survival. They make you a bitch to do labor or be a guard, those with military experience, join who they want and would be the upper class. BACK TO THE MOTHERF ING WILD PEOPLE! ARE YOU READY!