Army Admits Re-Education Manual "Not Intended for Public Release"

Army Admits Re-Education Manual "Not Intended for Public Release"

The sad fact is that this seems to be something that will be employed on United States soil considering the wording in the documentation that was released even despite the Army's claims to the contrary.

Another article which I don't really want to post because it's from infowars and isn't a terribly reliable source is this one titled
"Leaked U.S. Army Document Outlines Plans for Re-Education Camps in America"

I only list it because it's information is backed by the first source (plus it's good to use at least two sources).

Essentially they have plans for manipulating and brainwashing dissidents into accepting the polices of the United States. Never mind the fact that people should have the fundamental right to have their own opinions; some policies should not be supported, and; re-education camps are totally Orwellian and are pretty much exclusively practiced by repressive regimes such as the former Soviet Union and North Korea

Realizing how dangerous this is and also how there are Congressmen and Senators who appear to have expressed potentially sincere concerns about government excesses of power, and the fact that you can contact Senators and Congressmen out of state by phone-call (you can't write/e-mail, but you can always call :afro: ).

Senator Ron Wyden and Congressmen Peter DeFazio are good candidates, there are others you might wish to contact as well.

Their contact numbers are as follows

Wyden
DC: 1-202-224-5244
Oregon
- Portland: 1-503-326-7525
- Salem: 1-503-589-4555
- Eugene: 1-541-431-0229
Notes: Has routinely been pushing for disclosure on interpretations of the USA PATRIOT act which have amounted to secret law.


DeFazio
Contact: 1-800-944-9603
Notes: Sat on the Homeland Security Committee during the Bush Administration and exposed the fact that the administration denied them access to a Continuity of Government plan which they were entitled to and was probably highly odious. Here is the video

URL:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=KlD1hMYLkas

Try all the numbers, use whatever works works and proceed.

Being that these people are generally pro civil-liberties, I think it would be preferable to adopt a courteous and civil approach and appraise them of the facts. I would mostly focus on the Army Re-Education Manual (covered in the opening post) and so forth.

You can always call more than once in a week.

 

I wonder if these are the camps FEMA is supposed to be setting up.

 

TheRealThing

Who knows these days...

 

First: Paul Joseph Watson - Infowars MAY 10, 2012
Second: Paul Joseph Watson - Infowars.com May 3, 2012

 

No.

 

Yes, Odon, everything is EXACTLY the way consensus reality presents it to you. Nobody is lying to you, and the media always tells the truth. There is no such thing as conspiracies, and the world is just perfect. Keep on thinking this way and living in the dark.

 

Pressed_Rat

No.

Yes some are. PJ1783.

No.
Check source one and two.

My guess is, you'll accept the headline and not worry about the detail - like I do.

Do you agree that:
'Essentially they have plans for manipulating and brainwashing dissidents into accepting the polices of the United States.' ?

Even though the document states: 'Introduces detainees or DC to U.S and multinational policy.'

What Policy do you think they are going to introduce them to?

'We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness' ?

Where in the documents does it say that?

Where it says: 'within US territory' - it is talking about looking after civilians after natural disasters, terrorist attacks etc, not detaining them or re-educating them.

You'll probably get on well with, PJ1783, Mr Rat.

You both have a particular way of looking at issues - shared by Mr Jones and Mr Watson.

 

I only use lies on right-wing authoritarian types -- Pressed Rat doesn't seem to be that type of person.

 

Maybe they should re-educate the veterans first, ya know teach them how to work at mcdonald without blowing something up...

 

Take it easy on him 'Rat, he's on medication...



(lol odin, no offence buddy, just wanted to use the img again)

 

Seems legit'

Non taken.

I wasn't calling PR a liar... I was saying you both seem to have a particular way of interpreting information.

 

LOL @zombiewolf

 

I don't see where/how this document is proven to be authentic. I'm not asserting that it's not authentic, but throw me a bone here. I want to know. If it's simply a document hosted on some infowars server, that's not good enough. The title asserts that there has been some admission by the Army w/regard to this document, allegedly - where has this admission been made officially and can it be directly attributed to this document? Again, I'm not trying to cast doubt on it, but something like this needs a little more documentation.

 

Field Manual No.3-39.40

http://info.publicintelligence.net/USArmy-InternmentResettlement.pdf

 

This does nothing to confirm the source. I'm not trying to undermine the information, but I still don't see anything on this website that would convince me 100% the documents contained therein couldn't be fabricated. Somewhere it said that an "official" confirmed that this document was not meant to be released - What official, name? in what publication was this official quoted? Who leaked the document and to who did the document first get leaked? You can't just download an official looking PDF on the internet and assume that it's an authentic military document. That's just plain dangerous. Help me out here. Please.

 

http://armypubs.army.mil/doctrine/Active_FM.html

http://armypubs.army.mil/disclaimer.html

I have a feeling the document wasn't leaked, and I doubt an 'official' confirmed that it should not be released.
I doubt the document is fabricated. It seems you can download an authentic military document.

I notice most of them are old or not critical - perhaps after a year or so they are freely available. *shrugs shoulders*

 

Yes now read it and discuss here.
I'm worried about the FEMA thing someone mentioned

 

I read the bulk of it, and the particular parts of concern. What are you worried about?

 

No time to read, could you give me a summary?

 

Not really. Way too much detail.

Basically, what certain agencies would do after: conflict and natural disasters.