A desperate Bush.

Discussion in 'Politics' started by gardener, Jul 15, 2008.

  1. odon

    odon Slightly Popular

    Messages:
    17,595
    Likes Received:
    11
    Yes they do.
    Not on a par with a lot of countries though (obviously because of instability).

    You seem a fairly smart cookie, why can't you find anything out for yourself?
     
  2. BlondeAngela

    BlondeAngela Banned

    Messages:
    108
    Likes Received:
    6
    I have. No need to get defensive. I was obviously asking the question rhetorically, and to some extent of you, to find out what you knew.

    I find out many things myself, at least some the things I am interested in. Why would you assume I don't find things out myself? Just because I asked a rhetorical question?

    Trade agreements have to be studied closely. The 'devil is in the details'. Some of America's trade agreements, in regards to environmental protection, and our workers and theirs, and human rights records, are better than others.
    Of course, as you know, holding up other countries to certain standards is leverage, and hopefully makes improvements for people.
    First world countries, and civilzed countries, have certain standards in regards to the quality of the products, the environment, human rights, workers wages, etc., It is good that some countries have these standards, it applies pressure on others countries that if they want to sell their products in our country, they need to clean up their act a little.
    Of what I know of Columbia, it needs some work done in several areas, but I agree there are worse countries, even some we trade with alot already.
    But it really is how the trade agreement is crafted. It isn't a simple question of "free trade" vs. "protectionism", like the overly-simplistic knuckleheaded media often portraits it, it is more detailed and complex than that.
     
  3. odon

    odon Slightly Popular

    Messages:
    17,595
    Likes Received:
    11
    I did not mean to be defensive.
    No other way to say it I don't think.
    Just wanted to provoke a response.
    Columbia definitely has a bad reputation but I know they do work hard and are not living in the dark ages as far as these issues go.
    I agree it really is how the trade agreement is crafted.
    Plus how our companies operate in the country.
     
  4. BlondeAngela

    BlondeAngela Banned

    Messages:
    108
    Likes Received:
    6
    Very good then Odon!
     
  5. Aristartle

    Aristartle Snow Falling on Cedars Lifetime Supporter

    Messages:
    13,828
    Likes Received:
    14
    Hey, you're blonde, right?
     
  6. BlondeAngela

    BlondeAngela Banned

    Messages:
    108
    Likes Received:
    6
    Yes, I am blonde, bright, and beautiful!;):)
     
  7. gardener

    gardener Realistic Humanist

    Messages:
    10,027
    Likes Received:
    2
    Right on Angel. You ask the right questions, and have done your homework. One further question to ask who in our government and which large multinational companies with huge lobbying influence hold a financial interest in Colombia or stand to profit through expanded trade?

    http://www.pbs.org/frontlineworld/stories/colombia/corporate.html
     
  8. BlondeAngela

    BlondeAngela Banned

    Messages:
    108
    Likes Received:
    6
    Good question. Worth some research. That sometimes can tell you some things, can't it.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice