Post strange things that dont make sense about 9/11 in this thread,ill start.... Why did this reporter with CNN first report "NO EVIDENCE OF A PLANE HAVING CRASHED NEAR THE PENTAGON"?? (On 9-11-2001) http://www.thepowerhour.com/audio_files/jamie_mcintire_ 9_11.wav Well in 2006 he puts out a report totally the opposite statements saying he saw the wreckage,took photos,etc..... http://www.thepowerhour.com/audio_files/jamie_mcintire_5_16_1.wav I think someone got to this guy and threatend him to say all this in the 2nd clip!! What do others think?
MCINTYRE: The Web sites often take statements out of context, such as this exchange from CNN in which I -- myself -- appear to be questioning whether a plane really hit the building: From my close-up inspection, there's no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon. In fact, I was answering a question based on a eyewitness account who thought the American Airlines plane landed short of the Pentagon. I was indicated there was no crash site near the pentagon only at the Pentagon http://www.cnn.com/2006/EDUCATION/05/16/transcript.wed/index.html http://www.911myths.com/html/jamie_mcintyre_and_the_pentago.html
no..at first I was just sitting in the living room watching quietly as events unfolded...then my father came in and did the same
Ok, fair enough. I was working and it came on the radio...I carried on working. It feels more than 9 years ago now.
I was getting ready to go to work,but saw the 1st plane hit and stayed home and watched all day. Not odd tho.
Yes well even if that was true,why was the report he put out 5 years later THE EXACT OPPOSITE?? The 2nd recording he says he saw plane pieces,took photos,etc.... IN THE FIRST RECORDING HE SAID HE DIDNT SEE ANYTHING..... Why would his report change 6 years later unless someone threatened him to put out a bogus report? It IS interesting.....
Then why did they take the footage from around the pentagon THAT SHOWED WHAT REALLY HAPPEND THERE?? Your answer please??
The thing that always weirds me out is how the building fell. I saw videos of controlled demolitions and it looks exactly like that. It's really fishy.
whats even more fishy is NIST has been busted for 3 counts of lying about how the buildings the fell, (they were demolished) and now its in the ny eastern district federal court where the government is playing every dirty legal trick they can on the plaintiffs to derail the complaint. They were alread busted a couple times for other blatant (well lets call them mistakes) bu a high school physics teacher no less causing them to change those particular parts of the story because they were such obvious bs. 9/11 DOJ GRAND JURY PETITION NOTE: This is the original version filed on 10 April 2018. To read the most recent (30 July 2018) First Amended Petition click HERE. LC DOJ GRAND JURY PETITION | Lawyers' Committee for 9/11 Inquiry more: Petition More: A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Center 7 Project Info Lead Researcher(s) J. Leroy Hulsey Project Team Feng Xiao, Associate Professor, Nanjing University of Science and Technology Zhili Quan, Bridge Engineer, South Carolina Department of Transportation Project Dates May 1, 2015 - December 31, 2019 Final Report Download Final Report A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Center 7 (March 2020) Simulations and Videos Figure 4.16 Hypothetical Failure of Columns 76 to 81 Figure 4.17a Near-Simultaneous Failure of All Columns, Perspective 1 Figure 4.17a Video of WTC 7 Collapse, Perspective 1 Figure 4.17b Near-Simultaneous Failure of All Columns, Perspective 2 Figure 4.17b Video of WTC 7 Collapse, Perspective 2 Draft Report A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Center 7 (September 2019) Public Comments (September to November 2019) Open Data All input data, results data, and simulations that were used or generated during this study can be downloaded as a ZIP file: Download UAF WTC 7 Files (zip | 256 GB) Please be advised that the size of this ZIP file is 256 GB and that, after unzipping the file, the size of the folder containing all of the files is 632 GB. Therefore, downloading the ZIP file and unzipping it will require approximately 900 GB of storage space. Presentations A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Center 7 presentation by Dr. Leroy Hulsey on September 3, 2019 at the University of Alaska Fairbanks. Collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 presentation by Dr. Leroy Hulsey on September 6, 2017 at the University of Alaska Fairbanks. Progress Reports WTC7 Progress Report (September 2017) WTC7 Progress Statement (March 27, 2018) Project Summary The principal conclusion of our study is that fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse. The secondary conclusion of our study is that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building. Download Final Report World Trade Center 7 (WTC 7) University of Alaska Fairbanks
Oh yes, they knew, we the John Q Public didnt know! The BBC announced that WTC7 "collapsed" 25 minutes before it was demolished! Demolition isnt a theory! The Editors: Part of the conspiracy? (2) - BBC https://www.bbc.co.uk › blogs › theeditors › 2007/03 Mar 2, 2007 — So how did the BBC report that Building 7 at the World Trade Centre had collapsed around half an hour before it did so? There is no logical or reasonable answer for this other than there were plenty of people with full knowledge! MIHOP
