Hip Forums Click to Enhance Your Sex Life!   Click to Chat
Hip Forums Home Register Forum Options Mark Forums Read Social Groups Hip Universe Hip Radio Chat Room [1]

User's Login
User Name
Password
Remember Me?
Click to Advertise on the Hip Forums!
Hip Shops
Latest Videos
Active Journals
Forum Description: You can help change the world. Tell us what you think needs fixin.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-12-2007, 05:08 PM   #41
mbworkrelated
Banned
 
mbworkrelated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Leicester/England
Age: 37
Posts: 1,720
mbworkrelated is on a distinguished road
Like this post? Yes | No    

Quote:
Originally Posted by Professor Chaos
The highlighting quote option thing just doesn't seem to be working for me. sorry man. hard to read.
Quote:
Well I did think you were saying ''Stop puting words in my mouth'' too everything I was saying - then I reaslised what was going on.
If you quote something you need
QUOTE : at the begining
/QUOTE : at the end
QUOTE=persons name : at the begining if you want to be clever

all encapsulated in [ ]

Just take a look when you quote somebody
mbworkrelated is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2007, 05:53 PM   #42
mbworkrelated
Banned
 
mbworkrelated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Leicester/England
Age: 37
Posts: 1,720
mbworkrelated is on a distinguished road
Like this post? Yes | No    

Quote:
Originally Posted by Professor Chaos
This is often referred to as the "welfare wall."
I'd say ''swings and rounabouts'' but I get your point.
Quote:
Budget 2007 helps people over the welfare wall and into the dignity and independence that comes with a job."
Some people are just not able to work. Look at every individual as just THAT, idividually!
We have incapacity benefit - that is being [rightly or wrongly] abused by some of its reciepients. The gov' do want to get as many people off that and onto JSA [job seekers allowance].

Quote:
WRONG. The Government IS ignoring the people. That's pretty evident from the poverty rate. They can easily remedy that, with the vast wealth of this country.
Well lets agree to disagree here you are far more entrenched into it than I am.
Quote:
But when so much of that goes towards something as ridiculous as "National Security" here, it just makes my blood boil. What do we need security from? We have NEVER been attacked neither have any ATTEMPTS been made on us. It's all American propoganda. Everyone needs to stop buying into "fear of the muslims, for they will kill you". It's mad. Really.
How do you know no attempts have been made ? - i don't believe that.
Who defeats those attempts ?.
No - Canada maybe not the hotbed of terror - but remember what country you border.
I've never heard a good arguement to not have ''national security''.
Quote:
The problem is this: ANY idiot can be hired as a social worker. They have little or no compassion towards the people they deal with. I think a degree in Humanities should be mandatory. They view the "poor" as a disease that must be cured. Obviously they've been sucked into the capitalist view of "you are measured by your wealth". It's wrong.
How old are you - where did you get all your cyicism from ?. I thought all Canadians were happy jolly fellows [sarcasm].

Quote:
NEVER will I work for the scum that hates their fellow citizens.
And please don't tell me what I can or cannot do.
I did not mean to be patronising - sorry.
Just that removing your prob' validated cynicism - there is good people in every goverment. There are programmes in place too help - they just are not effective enough. Not all provinces in Canada are as bad as each other - Somebody somewhere is doing something RIGHT. It just needs more joined up goverment.
Quote:
Yes, my main concern is defeating capitalism. Because, at the end of the day, it DOES boil down to just that. Everyone is infected AND affected by it.
If you don't support ''capitalism'' how are you going to pay for all your social programmes ?. Half your tax revenue would disipate in months.

Quote:
Well that is true - but immigration is a issue - people having 7 kids is a issue.
People living longer and longer in their old age is a issue.
Quote:
Wow. I'm ashamed FOR you. That was absolutely hideous of you to say.
The more people who enter a country the more ''burden'' is placed on the authority - that leads onto issues within housing daycare wealthfare schools transport jobs - pretty much everything. I did not want to come across as a tad ''right wing'' but the reality imho is that everything has to be taken into consideration.

''A new method of counting migrants massively underestimates the real number of people moving to Britain and leads to council underfunding, the Treasury was warned today.

He said: "Estimates have failed to keep pace with what is happening on the ground and public services are suffering as a consequence.

"The migrants that come to Slough are hard-working and bring great benefit to the local economy but the council remains severely underfunded because of these poor statistics.

''
http://society.guardian.co.uk/asylum...079366,00.html

If every person had 7 kids because of their ''human right'' to have them - and 1/3 ended up not being able to support them - your tax burden would increase - thus pissing every tax payer off. There is a lot of money swishing around that might be true. Money you consider ''wasted'' i presume ?. When ''burdens'' [ok strains on the system] become out of sink then something suffers - don't you think ?.

Quote:
I agree.


Quote:
The "excuse" is this: Environment and Education. People tend to become products oftheir environment and have a severe lack of education (because it is not offered to them). EASILY remedied issues.
That is true - i don't dispute that. Does or should this lead to crime ? NO imho.

Quote:
NEVER said it was. I said once all options have been exhausted, violence might be necessary to get the point across to them.
The problem I have with that is that the person with the gun is always right [even if it is metaphorical]. The debate is shut down.
Not to say that sometimes violence is not a option - to overthrow the ''system'' - but Canada ? come on - no need for that there - you have made a good case for the goverment being jack asses but there is always two sides to the story.
mbworkrelated is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2007, 06:01 PM   #43
mbworkrelated
Banned
 
mbworkrelated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Leicester/England
Age: 37
Posts: 1,720
mbworkrelated is on a distinguished road
Like this post? Yes | No    

Quote:
Originally Posted by Professor Chaos
QUOTE=persons name : at the begining if you want to be clever


Well, now you're just being rude.
You have either a very good sense of humour or are far too sensitive.
I put it that way because it was a e.g - silly billy.
mbworkrelated is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2007, 06:20 PM   #44
mbworkrelated
Banned
 
mbworkrelated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Leicester/England
Age: 37
Posts: 1,720
mbworkrelated is on a distinguished road
Like this post? Yes | No    

Quote:
Originally Posted by Professor Chaos
You have a very skewed outlook on the world as it is. It's difficult for me to argue with you, because you don't listen. I have a serious lack of patience when it comes to that. Sorry, but I just don't want to bother anymore.
Well it was nice while it lasted - take care.




Quote:
I have no tolerance for condescension.
Gee whiz I was not attempting too -
mbworkrelated is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2007, 06:37 PM   #45
mbworkrelated
Banned
 
mbworkrelated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Leicester/England
Age: 37
Posts: 1,720
mbworkrelated is on a distinguished road
Like this post? Yes | No    

Quote:
Originally Posted by Professor Chaos
I'm sure we'll argue again sometime in the near future.
I just truly hope you open your eyes to the injustice plaguing your FELLOW humans.
If you view people as a "burden" you will, inevitably, discriminate against them.
Try omitting that word from your vocabulary. I can promise you, you'll feel a hell of a lot more humane.
I'm speaking of personal experience. I used to be just like you. It was suffocating.

PEACE
It is not that i'm blind to injustice i'm just not convinced your views and solutions are correct.
I don't view people as a ''burden'' it was just a wrong choice of word.
Yeah I know sometimes my language is ''off key'' I should watch it - I'm not a foul uncaring human being i'm very humane - I should just watch how I say things - I know this.
mbworkrelated is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2007, 06:40 PM   #46
gardener
Realistic Humanist
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Far Northern California
Age: 63
Posts: 10,044
gardener will become famous soon enough
Like this post? Yes | No    

Quote:
Originally Posted by mbworkrelated
We have incapacity benefit - that is being [rightly or wrongly] abused by some of its reciepients. The gov' do want to get as many people off that and onto JSA [job seekers allowance].
If this is anything like welfare reform in the US, that's all well and good if people can find jobs. But here even the people with college degrees can't keep up with the outsourcing. The only constant source of work are service jobs like motel maids and waiters and dishwashers. We are told we have to remain flexible and willing to retrain, but when a college education costs what it does how do you afford to reeducate every two years?
gardener is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2007, 08:27 PM   #47
ronald Macdonald
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: MacDonuts
Posts: 1,551
ronald Macdonald is on a distinguished road
Like this post? Yes | No    

ha ha ha - welcome to happy capitalism - thank fuck Europe is more social and sociable and willing to socialise further - not that I agree with socialism but I totally disagree with the idea that one should have to pay directly for ones education. If you need to re-educate every two years in order to be employable then heres the rub - let the person who benifits most from your employment, IE the employer, pay !

Otherwise just educate yourself - did you klnow or realise trhat anyone can educate themselves to a 1st class degree or 2:1 standard in anything at all from books alone - That is the viewpoint of many professors - it would take 4 to 10 years but it can be done - why not do that ? knowledge sells and its free - educate yourself - I did and now I havent signed unemployed for over 5 years and prior to that I begged borrowed and saved to get me where I wanted to be. I rely on no-one especially not them cretins in government

get yourself off unemployment benifit and stop relying on others! why do you need a job when going into business costs nothing ?
ronald Macdonald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2007, 09:06 PM   #48
mbworkrelated
Banned
 
mbworkrelated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Leicester/England
Age: 37
Posts: 1,720
mbworkrelated is on a distinguished road
Like this post? Yes | No    

Quote:
Originally Posted by gardener
If this is anything like welfare reform in the US, that's all well and good if people can find jobs. But here even the people with college degrees can't keep up with the outsourcing. The only constant source of work are service jobs like motel maids and waiters and dishwashers. We are told we have to remain flexible and willing to retrain, but when a college education costs what it does how do you afford to reeducate every two years?
No it is not like ''welfare reform'' it is another tier of govermental subsidy.
A lot of people have claimed incapacity benefit because they have not merited JSA.
This is not the case with everybody but a minority.
In some cases it runs within familys - the welfare state has generationaly benefited a whole raft of people.
This in any right thinking persons mind has to be addressed.
mbworkrelated is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2011, 03:30 AM   #49
Patriot4Revolt
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 8
Patriot4Revolt is an unknown quantity at this point
Like this post? Yes | No    

How about we follow in our successful ancestors footsteps and try due process to take our country back. If that fails, force may be necessary.

Why are we not willing to fight and potentially die to take our great nation back, the way our ancestors did? Did they deserve to pay a steeper price than present-day Americans? If so, kindly explain.

God bless our great PEOPLE, not an oppressive, self-serving regime that acts in its own best interest, NOT in our people's best interests.

We need to stand up for ourselves, if we don't, no one else will. Actions speak louder than words. It is our DUTY, not just our right to do so.

Inaction = Acceptance. Not OK with me. Where are my compatriots that want to protect our great freedoms? Anyone?

I know we American people are MORE grateful for our freedoms and rights than inaction. And those who aren't, Canada is north - get moving!
Patriot4Revolt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2011, 02:57 PM   #50
chordcat
Member
 
chordcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: over the hills and far away
Posts: 93
chordcat is on a distinguished road
Like this post? Yes | No    

The way anything seems to turn violent lately is via the government trying to stop a group of peaceful protestors. Big groups of people are terrifying and threatening to the government.
chordcat is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:56 AM.

The Hip Forums are intended for mature audiences for entertainment and educational purposes only. Hip Inc. doesn't encourage anyone to break laws, so know the law where you live. You are solely responsible for your actions on this site and illegal activities will be not be tolerated here.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Hip Inc. 1996-Forever!