StonerBill
09-28-2008, 02:35 PM
on DMT, i felt spirits in everything. Everything had its own spirit and was a being. objects, plants, perceptions, as well as all else.
On LSD, everything was one spirit, one being, and everything was an appendage of the one soul. Things were not seperate entities except seperate people, and after a certain point even us seperate people become one.
On psylocibin, everything was alive, but much less conscious. More like a plant or a morphing maggot. The unity occured did not seem to imply consciousness in things, nor unify the consciousness. The soul in things was merely the soul of life, of organism, and not of mind.
From my experiences with these drugs, DMT is the only animistic one. There were spirits everywhere.
but LSD seemed more.. mystic and unified.. as if the spirit of the universe was there in everything.. but was also absent from being anywhere in particular.
what do you guys think about my experiences?
On LSD, everything was one spirit, one being, and everything was an appendage of the one soul. Things were not seperate entities except seperate people, and after a certain point even us seperate people become one.
On psylocibin, everything was alive, but much less conscious. More like a plant or a morphing maggot. The unity occured did not seem to imply consciousness in things, nor unify the consciousness. The soul in things was merely the soul of life, of organism, and not of mind.
From my experiences with these drugs, DMT is the only animistic one. There were spirits everywhere.
but LSD seemed more.. mystic and unified.. as if the spirit of the universe was there in everything.. but was also absent from being anywhere in particular.
what do you guys think about my experiences?