PDA

View Full Version : uU.S. supreme court votes unanimously in favor of hallucinagenic tea for church..


hippiehillbilly
02-22-2006, 07:26 PM
so lets all start a church aye??:p

no but serious,, aint this a huge precident opening doors?


http://news.monstersandcritics.com/northamerica/article_1131751.php/Court_Hallucinogenic_tea_OK


WASHINGTON, DC, United States (UPI) -- The U.S. Supreme Court Tuesday rejected government arguments against the use of a hallucinogenic tea in religious services.

The 8-0 ruling written by Chief Justice John Roberts stemmed from a New Mexico case involving O Centro Espirita Beneficente Uniao Do Vegetal, a Spiritst Christian sect originating in the Amazon Rainforest. The court`s newest justice, Sam Alito, did not take part in the case.

The sect, which has about 130 members, brews a sacramental tea from plants unique to the Amazon, containing hallucinogens regulated by the Controlled Substances Act.

The government argued no exceptions can be made to the anti-drug law, even though it conceded the sect`s use of the tea was a sincere expression of religious practice.

'We do not doubt that there may be instances in which a need for uniformity precludes the recognition of exceptions to generally applicable laws under (the Religious Freedom Restoration Act),' Roberts wrote. 'But it would have been surprising to find that this was such a case, given the longstanding exemption from the Controlled Substances Act for religious use of peyote, and the fact that the very reason Congress enacted RFRA was to respond to a decision denying a claimed right to sacramental use of a controlled substance.'

2cesarewild
02-22-2006, 07:33 PM
Yeee

nesta
02-24-2006, 03:20 AM
wonderful!!!!! i couldn't be more thrilled. i had a feeling this would happen when i was reading about this when there were some news stories a few months ago, but i dont really watch the supreme court too closely and was unsure when to check to find out the end. i'm glad they voted in favor of it!

but really, movements to legalize the peyote sacrament among members of certain churches was really what paved the way for this, and i believe there are similar cases existing for peyote churches setting precedent for those involving the ayahuasca churches today. and still even natives are harrassed by LEO's for peyote, and its widely known they're allowed to have it. people get arrested, have their gardens and peyote and such confiscated, have other goods confiscated, and they generally dont end up in any real trouble but you can bet they dont generally get back the peyote they tended to for years......

but i guess i'm going off on a tangent. anyway, what i mean to say is voting in favor of an exemption is one thing, but the judiciary and the executive are seperate and act independantly in theory. the police may still arrest people for this because DMT is still an illegal drug, but they will generally be able to get out of real trouble if they have an actual affiliation with an actual ayahuasca church. the average middle class suburban kid isn't likely to be able to claim religious freedom if he gets caught with ayahuasca because he heard it's something you can "trip balls from" that you can get online.

but still, it is definitely, definitely good news that at even in such a disgustingly conservative government led largely by bush's cronies, at least the supreme court tries to stick up for our constitutional rights...most of the time....

this is strong evidence that the system isn't ENTIRELY rotten.

TokeTrip
04-17-2006, 11:10 PM
consider: many of the currently legal plants in it may become noticed and scheduled by the govt.

polymer
04-18-2006, 04:52 AM
i doubt it.

dmt brews aren't exactly in big demand. it's not a particularly widely abused drug.

if anything, they should be going after those "goof-balls", and "slippy-flippies".

dannyandryan
04-18-2006, 05:09 AM
consider: many of the currently legal plants in it may become noticed and scheduled by the govt.i think we need to start an acid/mushroom/bud/X/coke/staying fucked up religon.. who else is down with me?