Originally Posted by RooRshack
liberal/non authoratarian socialists believe in absolute freedom in the sense of no victimless crimes, for something to be limited it must harm another.
Right wing "libertarians" believe in freedom for them, but fuck anyone who wants an equal freedom, it's cool to go corporate-thieving or cutting up baby dicks.
I guess if that baby deserved to not have it's dick chopped on, it would be strong enough to fight off a circumcision, because that's how right libertarianism works..... you can have what you can take.
Originally Posted by StpLSD25
Wow this is condescending.. I don't think any libertarian would agree with that at all.
Of course they wouldn't agree. To avoid that they will spend days (or on here, like with individual, YEARS and hundreds of pages, thousands of lines of text) dancing around.
But that's what right-wing libertarian views amount to, even if they would deny it when it's phrased like that.
They want the right to trample on others, they think that their freedom extends to cutting the bodies of babies and taking the bread of the poor while they have more than they could spend in ten lifetimes. It's okay, because they worked for those things.
As your post makes no distinction, remember that not all libertarians are right-wing neocons, just the evil "libertarians" I mentioned.
It's generally like saying that slavery was about states rights (to declare black people inhuman property). WE WANT FREEDOM (to take other people's freedom).
It also usually uses a red herring and/or ad hominem attack...... someone will come back at me here and say something along the lines of "you think what we have is working yada yada blah blah", implying that I like the current situation any better.