
Off-year elections were held in a number of places around the country on November 3, 2009. In NJ [New Jersey] and Virginia, the incumbent party, the Democrats, were thrown out of the governorship. In NYC [New York City], Republican incumbent Mayor Bloomberg was reelected by 51% to 46%, even though he spent about 14 times the amount of the Democratic opponent! People are angry with the austerity being implemented by state and local governments. Also, both deposed NJ governor Corzine and Bloomberg are seen as rich Wall Street types, and that is not very popular at this time. Also, in the 23rd congressional district in upstate New York, the Democrats took a seat in a special election, even though it had been a solidly Republican district since the Civil War. Many right-wingers, such as Sarah Palin, had tried to capture this seat for the Conservative Party candidate, since the official Republican candidate was seen as being “too liberal.” Their support for the Conservative Party candidate forced the Republican to drop out. The result? The more “liberal” Democrat was elected.
Capitalist politics has been moving to the right since the 1970s, when the post-war boom came to an end. The capitalists system is in decline and they will make the workers and the middle class pay dearly for this crisis. Therefore, the capitalists are not willing or able to give any reforms. When the system was booming, they would give a few crumbs from their table to maintain social peace. But the system no longer allows this.
However, while the system pushes the ruling class to the right, there is also much anger in the working class. This anger is expressed in an often confused and distorted fashion, since there is no mass party of the working class in this country. For example, the Republican right-wing advertises itself as “anti-establishment,” even though they are bought and paid for by big business! They have also tried to rally opposition to changes in health care by claiming to defend Medicare. They run ads opposing Obama's health care plan (which is a million miles from socialized health care), explaining that it will cost precious jobs that they dearly want to defend!
This shows that the right-wing knows the mood of the masses is not for cuts in social programs. However, this is precisely what the Democrats and Republicans, liberals and conservatives alike must do. They must institute counter-reforms, deepening cuts in the few social programs that exist, because this is what crisis-ridden American capitalism demands. As the federal budget deficit skyrockets, they must at some point raise taxes and cut social programs to deal with it.

In Maine, a referendum repealing marriage equality for gay men and lesbians has passed. This is another strategy of the ruling class: divide and rule. As the crisis continues to unfold, their goal is to divide the working class and get people to fight against each other, rather than unite against big business.
In Ohio, the building of four Casinos has been approved, on the promise of modest job creation in a state with 11% unemployment. This is the “solution” the rich offer: to gamble away your earnings in the desperate hope you might hit the jackpot!
At some stage, the present crisis will be reflected in a sharp debate in the labor movement. Those labor leaders who said trust the Democrats will be challenged by the membership. Workers will see that we need a political alternative to fight both the Republicans, who are the open enemy of the working class, and the Democrats, who claim to be friends but are every bit as controlled by big business. As this debate unfolds, the possibility to establish a mass labor party will become a reality. With the anger that exists among workers in youth, is there any doubt that such a party would do very well politically, even though it would be ruthlessly defamed by the politicians and the media? In these latest elections, turnout was dismally low as workers see no real alternative but “the other guy.” Offered a mass workers' alternative, currently “apathetic” workers and youth will come out in large numbers to organize and vote for such a party. Workers and youth who are looking to change this system should join with the WIL (Worker's International League) to fight for this perspective, to help bring real change in the interests of the vast majority, not the few super rich.
Written by Tom Trottier
the double-agent hypocrisy of Saudi Arabia.
Being a friend to the West while simultaneously exporting learning centers of radical jihad; pretending to be modern, while simultaneously appealing to the most virulent anti-woman sections of radical Islam.
We have to face the fact that democracy has merely evolved into another quasi-science: the science and technique of attaining and keeping political power. Its now not much different than any other technical discipline, except it never allows to public view its real raison de'etre!
I agree and believe we have to give up on holding onto social theories when it comes to practice. I see a terrible misconception, emerging all the time everywhere. For instance "Marx is associated with communism associated with USSR = Fail" conclusion "Marx = Fail" and such. Common mistake: If a social theory didn't prove to be perfect let's oppose the entire theory. Or if a social theory, applied to reality, proved to work good at some point let's turn it into a model for a political system and stick to that model, eventhough it destroys the majority of earth's population.
Social theories should NOT be turned into models for a political system. Political System should be flexible and be changing all the time. A lot of people will deny some reasonable political reforms just because those reforms sound too 'communist' to them or will support capitalism just because they are against communism, because they dislike those wacky russian/chinese commies.
Like I say, I am anti-capitalist at the moment, because Capitalism no longer benefits the working class and the working class is the majority, so I am with them. But if Capitalism benefits the working class, I will support Capitalism
I don't mind though, as I am not interested in serving an idea or a theory, but the interests of people I have sympathy for
lol
Funny thing is: nobody ever really metnions the fact that communism could not exist without Capitalism, that it sprung from the loins of Capitalism, and Marx was a well-informed theoretician who gave one of the most sterling and complementary descriptions of the bourgoisie ever(page twenty-something of the manifesto). Deep down, I think in the bourgoisie mind (the purely technical mind that contemplates means as ends) life is all about present opportunities;if their are opportunities in revolution-exploit them. If there are better ones with the capitalist status quo-exploit those. Is their a difference in the bourgoise mind between Communism and Capitalism,AS LONG AS THEY BOTH PAY THE BILLS? Ask the Chinese...
I would never lose an opportunity to make some cash myself, but now it goes towards the moral grounds and for some reason I don't like that topic, may be because it generates never-ending and out-there discussions.
So, I would never lose an opportunity to make some cash as long as it is not against my moral grounds. Which basically are 'live and let live'. which again is so 'out-there'. I'd never kill anyone to make cash & I probably would if my child's life depended on it. So, I'd say that comment was rather realistic.
That's what I am saying though, nobody said we should separate one from another (your comment about communism without capitalism). Let's just let it flow? See how it goes, modify it, trying to keep some sort of a balance so that everyone could be able to benefit if they want. I am not interested in a fancy life so I'd be fine with just being able to pay my bills. But someone wants to enjoy the latest tech. achievements, and they are willing to work hard for being able to have a fancy car or a house? why shouldn't they be able to accomplish that just because they were born poor?
Now I would say: "Capitalists will still sell you the rope to hang themselves with, but then they will expect you to cut them down and take full responsibililty for the incident and supply unlimited medical care to nurse them back to health."
If I get your second paragraph correctly, you would like to see us move away from all ideologies and let reason replace dogma in the arena of social concerns. That would be great-but still a ways off...
I think we don't really need anything else except Reason. If people hold on to reason only, they will get united, as it would take someone with ability to reason to convince them that they should move to 'this' direction and not 'that one'. And since people will use Reason as the only absolute, a valid reason/argument would be enough for them to follow. I believe, it will remove all the quarrels and pointless discussions people engage in due to the necessity of proving they are 'right' in order to boost their self-confidence. Therefore Moral Categories will disappear as well. If you are weak (in any sense), then it's just a fact, neither bad nor good. So, instead of trying to prove you are strong, just see how you can live being weak (which actually will help you grow stronger, but it's a different topic)
So, the mass media supports the first two categories and tries to get rid of the third one usually by labeling those individuals with anything that is not in the current morality or tradition, in order to divert mass' sympathy from them. That damn trick of theirs is fabulous, works perfect and people adopted it and practice it themselves for quite a while already. Examples:
"yes, he sounds reasonable, but his sympathy for Marx/Nietzsche, man, he is communist/racist, fuck him"
or
"he sounds reasonable, but he masturbates/watches porn a lot, perv, fuck him"
or even
"he sounds reasonable, but what he is trying to do is crazy, fuck him"
communist, racist, perv, crazy are labels. I don't mind to be called any of them, but to anyone who labels me I'd like to say "now that we officially established that I am let's say crazy, elaborate on what I do and say. Is what I do/say crazy? if yes -why? If you cannot provide any valid reason, then you are crazy and it is time to heal up"
Not only does mass media label mentally healthy people, it also labels and defines everything for the first 2 categories: what's good and bad, what to wear, eat, believe, watch. Where to go, work, when and how. And slowly puts signs everywhere. Signs help humans act without thinking. The goal is to prevent people from thinking, because thinking helps to develop the ability to reason. NLP (neuro linguistic programming) is in its fullest already, linguistics is very underestimated by ordinary people. Just the way I speak/write matters (especially if I do it consciously and know how to manipulate using those skills ). Using linguistics one can make people do unbelievable things, while making them feel they are acting at their own will or even against will of the person who really manipulates them. Lack of the ability to reason makes it nearly impossible to figure out what is real and what's going on. And if you push the limits trying, you can actually end up having a stroke lol That's why people turn to a glass of whiskey, a joint or video games (etc) -to turn off the brain, to stop filtering information and just perceive it whole as it is, in order to relax and not to go nuts. Sometimes they forget to turn it on lol and thus become a tool for those few in whose hands Media is concentrated. Currently they are having tremendous success in promoting mass apathy at certain aspects of our existence.
was it enough talk of media concentration?
The only reason why nobody talks about it on the political arena is mass apathy. Support the idea of Worker's Party, promote it and you will have people tlaking about it out loud