Julian Assange Statement On The U. S. Elections

Hillary Clinton would have lost the election without the WikiLeaks.

 

Being a sexual predator isn't a crime, although some feminists would like it to be. (If it were a crime Bill 'blowjob' Clinton would be in jail)
Deleting government emails is a crime (since 2009).

Do you see the difference?

 

In the Donald Trump thread, on October 14th, you said:

Could you please clarify your position, please. It seems a bit contradictory to defend the right of the free press to choose a political side in one thread, but condemn WikiLeaks for the same thing.

Also I'm a little bit sorry because I do hate when people dig up old posts to prove a point, but your comments above have stuck with me because I didn't really understand how you could defend the obvious influence the DNC had over the mainstream media this election. And in light of your comments regarding Wikileak's bias, I understand even less.

I couldn't find your post regarding this, but (please corrent me if I'm mistaken) I believe you al;so pointed out that there is a long history of political parties using the press for their own political gain and the press in turn favoring one candidate over the other.

How is WikiLeaks different, exactly?

 

what are you on about? what is your definition of sexual predator, because I consider it someone who makes nonconsensual advances which very definitely falls under the definition of sexual assault or rape, depending on the severity. And those are most definitely crimes.

you're just a troll, right? I just have no other explanation

 

Someone who uses his position of wealth or authority to bed someone who would normally say no.
Like Bill 'blowjob' Clinton did with Monica. Not a crime, just a bit nasty.


You might try to refute the post and not insult the poster ........ anyone you don't agree with you just insult, are you not capable of a reasoned response.
How many of my posts have you responded with an insult? It's getting to be a bit of a problem for you, why not add your definition? If it appears to differ from mine.

 

The ONLY reason I didn't "like" this is because I have run out of likes...

You are 100% right...and you are NOT the only one that finds the post you referred to as trolling.

Surely even Trump supporters would agree that being a sexual predator is a crime.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e04KEmsAc8k

Damn, not fast enough, I see you removed the "feminazi" remark,

 

first of all, I'm not a feminazi, I quite frankly think such labels are idiotic, but I know it is easier to put people into boxes with these neat little insulting labels, rather than view them as a three dimensional human being with nuanced thoughts and opinions. I get it.

anyways, thanks for clarifying. Someone who uses their authority to lure someone into consensual sex is indeed not a crime, happens all the time.

Also, in response to your edited remarks ( I see you also recognized the idiocy of terms like feminazi, so that's wonderful) I am not picking on you, its nothing personal, I just generally don't agree with you and I find your views on women unsettling. but this isn't the thread to get into that.

 

I'm capable of reasoned response to an insulting poster ........... no need to lower myself to their level.

 

How is everyone so certain that the hackers were Putin's insiders? You do realize that the Clintons have amassed so many enemies that span much much further than Trump's cronies. I find it disgusting how the media uses its manipulation tactics to try to distort the story to make it sound like it's all Russia's fault the DNC hated Bernie Sanders. The real villains were the corrupt individuals who stacked the deck and forced a candidate down the throats of their voters. Heck, if I knew how to get away with it (alive), I too would have hacked and released the Podesta files, and I'd have done it all for free. I mean Podesta's email password was "p@ssword" all along FFS.

 

lets just assume it was the russian government that was behind the wikileaks and lets just assume that it was enough to sway the election.
so russia was doing its part to do what it thought was best for its own interest.

USA WOULD NEVERRRRRR MEDDLE WITH FOREIGN COUNTRIES ELECTIONS OR TRY TO GET THE LEADERS THAT ARE IN OUR BEST INTEREST ELECTED!

 

Assange tries to claim impartiality, then in that letter talks about his bias for the Obama administration for its dealings with Chelsea Manning.

If Russian hackers, or whoever it was, but most likely Russian hackers, hadn't supplied him with all those Clinton related emails...what would Wikileaks have reported over the last 12 months, how would they have gotten their brand in the headlines.

As if his organisation isn't subject to the same forces of supply and demand every other is


He is a hero to trump supporters in 2016, but it won't be long before he digs in and upsets even some good trump may try to do.

Assange is a slime bucket. Probably did Russia's work for them. not knowingly, but becuase he didn't have much else at the time and he didn't want his little project to fade into oblivion

 

I think Foghorn Leghorn should have been on the ballot this time. Better than what we had to choose from.

 

There was better than what we had to choose from. Well kind of...there are more than 2 parties. And there is a write in line.