Is Clinton's Emails A Hillary Strategy?

Is Hillary stringing along the voters, because they have such short memories? Is she drip drip dripping the release until it's close enough to the election to reveal that the cons have been conducting a witch hunt on her? If she can show the country that the cons are extremists, by wasting millions of dollars with these endless investigations, it could get her the nomination.

I seriously doubt that the cons or the media have enough foresight to even consider this. The media just wants to stir the shit pot for ratings. And the cons are out to smear mud on any and all liberals. I don't think they have enough brains to take any of this into consideration.

The cons have wasted a half billion dollars on congressional investigations and hearings on Benghazi, in their effort to smear Obama and Hillary. If she waits till next summer to make the point of republican waste, it will be fresh in the minds of voters.

If Hillary can make fools out of the cons before the election she will win.

I guess we'll have to wait and see.

 

Honestly, no I don't think it's her strategy. I think it detrimentally hurts her chances of becoming president. I don't think people are smart enough to see through it and realize that it really doesn't matter what she email or from where. It was not deliberate and she won't be held accountable by the law, but all people can see is the media flaming up about "150" instances. http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/state-dept-finds-about-150-clinton-e-mails-with-classified-material/ar-AAdOmyA

 

Let me guess....you aren't a Hillary supporter....I support Bernie....but it looks like you got all these accusations from the GOP.

 

But Skip, the White House has a kickin bondage room. It used to be a brig of a sort for interrogating high profile prisoners. Nobody will admit who had it installed.

As for the servers and missing mail, Nixon was brought down with less.

I'm tired of American dynasties running our lives into the ground. But I do predict that Kanye will indeed win in 2020, but will lose to Jenna Bush in 2024. She'll get 2 terms and then get trounced by Chelsea Clinton.

 

The LA Times and the NY Times both carried the story from the GAO that the Clinton administration left damage in their wake as they left the White House. The most common estimate was $15,000 in all. Part of that was that someone on the Clinton staff stole or damaged all of the W keys on keyboards. A rather petty thing to do considering that Bill had 2 terms. It's not like GW beat him, he clearly didn't. And Gore waited until the last part of his campaign to bring Clinton into it. By then it was too late. A Clinton plan takes time (and bodies).

I bet the Clinton machine could have pulled Florida away from GW even with Jeb the puppet as governor. But Gore shunned the Clintons early in his campaign, a huge mistake. I think Obama owes quite a bit to the Clintons as well. While the republicans yet again trot out their usual campaign boredom all we see from democrats is infighting. This is not how they have won so many campaigns before. Look how democrats banded together to get Cantor's republican opposition elected (and Cantor tossed out). A very shrewd move.

For decades we could count on democrats campaigning arm in arm solely to beat republicans at any cost. They always turn out for elections and function as a common team. After the election they go back to being a collection of warring kingdoms. Except this time. This time we see democrats presenting a bunch of squabbling old white people as if SNL was doing a skit. The republicans present a weird, but diverse field of confirmed assholes and whipping boys as well as a job killing corporate bitch shark who doesn't have a prayer (she's there to ride Hillary and avoid the sexist card).

It's all theater. Throwing in on either side entirely would only be fanatical. Their both the same snobbish country club.

 

Ok ok, besides Bubba only adding one trillion to the national debt, compared to two trillion by Shrub daddy, and $6 trillion by Shrub Jr.. And Shrub Jr. destroying the balanced budget that Bubba left office with....which dynasty did the least amount of damage?

Yeah yeah, "Voting for the lesser of two evils is still voting for evil." But not voting is giving the most evil the keys to your life.

If it comes down to the "Bush" dynasty vs. the "Clinton" dynasty, I'm gonna vote Clinton.

Breaking it down...Bush=War with Iran-end of Social Security-end of healthcare-end of equal rights for marriage-more national debt-more benefits for corporations-more prosecutions for pot- more police state.

With Hillary those things are the opposite.

 

White House Chief of Staff: Valerie Jarrett has released more dirt on HRC than any Republican ever could, Yeah Elizabeth Warren for President.

 

I think Warren has endorsed Bernie.....

 

Now, I don't like repeating myself this much but there IS a third option (well technically a fourth if we would consider not voting at all also as something meaninful.. which it isn't.). The only reason not voting for a smaller party is that people are too scared that the 'biggest of two evils' will win (again). Which in return will make sure most people vote as usual on one of the 2 evils and there is no chance on political change in your country. The democrats should feel very comfy (I think in general they are complacent with the current political situation). They have only one big opponent which at the moment has a charicature as number 1. Neither deserves the vote of the american people (my opinion). Fuck any 'dynasty'.

 

Yes you do.

 

No, just because I actually do it doesn't mean I like that You guys should just listen to me the first time :crowngrin:

 

So you're saying you won't vote if Bush and Hillary are the nominees?

 

No, not saying that at all. If I was an american I would look up the third party option that suits me best and vote for them. Crazy idea right?

 

^
That sounds like some solid info. Does it come from an article or what's the source? Just wondering!

Hey, it's election time (well in a year or so) Yeah, I am kidding a little bit now, but smearing your rival and distract the public with it seems the inevitable and accepted approach around election time in the USA.

 

If you were an American you'd vote 3rd party? Until you are an American, you don't really know how you would vote. It's why I don't speculate on how I'd vote if I was French.

I voted for Perot, I thought he had a chance and his message was open and honest. What I didn't realize was that all I accomplished was a minor bump in the road for the dynasties that currently trade the oval office back and forth. There is a deeper side to the two main parties than the press would ever reveal. While I was glad to see Bush 1 booted from office, Clinton wasn't much better. Then we got Bush 2.

The problem with 3rd parties in the US today is both viability and narrow focus. Look at the Green Party, they could only get a president elected from their ranks AFTER an apocalypse. And they still support the likes of Cynthia McKinney, a certifiable loon who had it all in congress until she opened her j-a-w-s.

Even though Trump is currently running as a republican he's about as 3rd party as it gets. He's not distracted by wedge issues and is going straight for the job killers, as was Perot. However, Trump also has a side that reminds me of Bush 1 and his creepy CIA buddies. But Trump is a casino guy, so I worry that Americans may just elect a band of mobsters who will continue the tradition of looting the American people. Other than Trump there is not likely to be a viable 3rd party run.

 

New to American politics? [jk] That kind of thing only happens on days that end in Y.

 

Yeah, I rarely inform about the source(s) as well but now I just wondered if all those numbers etc. came from the same source or if you made the effort of looking up several yourself in order to make that info complete and convincing. :cheers2: