Kim Kardashian

you likey?

 

It actually gets worse.

JORTS




JORTS lol

 

She needs Emma Watson's stylist. If I had daughters my hope would be they look up to someone like her; she is classy, poised, intelligent and is an absolute babe, much more desirable than Kardashian.

 

Lol do you guys really thinks she needs a (different) stylist because she flaunts a trashy style? It's not an accident she is wearing the stuff she does. It really seems she needs a stylist solely because you don't like it

 

Oh, it's the "He For She" campaigner.

 

Oh dear yeezus. So bad.

Yes I adore her. She is articulate and intelligent and has wonderful style.

And of course she's Hermione, which automatically makes her a million times better than any kardashian

 

Yeah, she started it all with that "virgin birth" story, then blaming God for it...no class at all.

 

Working It!

The upcoming Beauty and the Beast movie is going to be huge, chiefly because of her

The Hepburn of this generation

 

It was terrible. The worst sex tape I've ever seen.

One Night in Paris is Oscar worthy compared to the KK sex tape.

 

I don't think her style is all that terrible. I only seen photos in this thread though, in which, well ya know. Not all bad. I think torn jeans can look pretty good. I don't wear them, but some girls can pull it off. -shrug-

 

Oh, her style is stellar.

Her sex tape, on the other hand, is not so stellar.

 

There's one photo a little earlier of like this black bikini thing. But the g string thing was like, pulled up to her waist and I didn't like the photo or the style of swimsuit at all. I also notice she's quite full in the hips, which I like it reminds me a little of my partner. I also like how this Kim is pretty stout on not wearing a bra from what I can see with absolutely no qualms as to her breasts standing out and see through. I think that's good, strong woman. if I had breasts like that I probably would too easy.

 

Since this thread is about style, sort of - if you use the word "style" very loosely (ha)...I want someone to explain to me WHY so many of these popular "stylish" women walk and stand pigeon-toed.

The only people I know irl that do that look awkward, and it is certainly NOTHING I would ever want to emulate. It also looks little girlish...so is that the reason??? Just like it is the style to have all the hair on one's nether regions stripped off...so you'll look like a little girl?

Because that "want to look like a little girl" for a grown man is a damn creepy ass thing!

 

Seriously? You're asking if women shave their public hair because they want to look like little girls?

 

It is an interesting question. There does appear to be a some sort of connection here. Giving off the impression, at least subtly,that one is prepubescent as a "style" does seem to be the thing to do for both males and females..

 

I am far FAR from the only person that has ever expressed this. In fact, one of the older and highly respected members here has expressed the same thing...in that HE finds/found it very disconcerting that grown women want no pubic (not public ) hair...and that this trend seems to be very popular now.

Furthermore I've even known men IRL that like that area somewhat shaved but NOT BARE! Why and how can you not comprehend this?

This respected member was the 1st person that compared a bare-of-hair woman to a little girl. He didn't understand it anymore than I! I also can't understand why any woman would want to put themselves through getting it all bare, unless of course that is what their man wants.

 

I'd be quite tickled with this lady, as long as she's smart and has a good personality. Not everyone needs to look like a Kardashian to be attractive.

 

I grew up in the generation that felt it more necessary to get rid of pubic hair. That's how we saw it, in the porn etc. it was all shaven or waxed. That's what was attractive to my generation and that's what I've emulated, I guess. :unsure: but I've never ever done it too look like a child or anything like that. And it's a thing you know, I know a lot of people like a bit of hair but there's just as many if not more people, still in my age bracket that don't and won't accept it. And this is problem of sorts with young girls. It's pressure. I guess I felt some sort of pressure to maintain that area or else I probably wouldn't have done it.

It's also a hygiene thing too. Though if you keep hygienic it probably isn't going to be a problem.

I guess I've never really had to fur down there, so I can't say which is better only I'm very comfortable with my decisions to not keep it. That's just a part of who I am now. but if some guy was having a look and then had the hint of audacity to tell me I looked like a child, I'd boot that pervert so hard in the balls. Then one in the mouth for good measure.

 

Irmi, it MUST be a generational thing. By the time I saw any porn, my "area" was already what it would be. WAY WAY back, even in porn, the women weren't absolutely bald down there. Of course I (and others) would have to do a lot of shaving...sometimes it would be a "landing strip" (I had it called ) but I honestly never knew anybody even up to 15 yrs younger than me (say around yr 2000) that had NO hair. We all could wear bikinis and not worry about hair; but, there was hair. lol


NOW - to my main question that I started out with, and I was really referring to Kim K's feet position in her jorts - what is it about this pigeon-toed thing that I see in many women and some men. I think it is an affectation...but why is that considered attractive??? Again, I'm reminded of a child and innocence. Lord knows most of these fake pigeon toed people are anything but innocent. lol

 

Probably like wearing heels there's something behind it. Straight off the top of my head, rotate your knees in, you're kinda of tencing up your glutes, hamstring area which = ass tightening. that'd be it I think. Like heels push the breasts out, pigeon toed tences the ass cheeks. :rofl: