Jump to content


Click to shop at Weed Seed Shop
Photo
- - - - -

new planets




  • Please log in to reply
34 replies to this topic

#31 themnax

themnax

    Senior Member

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 19,519 posts
  • Locationa small green planet in a distant galaxy

Posted March 21 2014 - 02:00 PM

i suppose what somebody may have had in mind, was communicating with people, who would be new to us, because we haven't met them yet, because they live on worlds too far away to get there from here.

i just think the thread title, is an absurdly ignorant way of putting it.

as if people didn't realize it takes billions of years, after a planet is formed, before life can begin to develop on it.

i don't know, maybe some people are that ignorant. it kind of gives me the creeps to think that anyone actually is.

my nation is the imagination

this is the dawning of the age of zootopia

and thank god i'm not quite human

=^^=
.../\...


#32 Anaximenes

Anaximenes

    Senior Member

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,866 posts

Posted March 21 2014 - 02:13 PM

Apparently they've got empirically connected data between DNA plausibility and spectral wavelengths for the colour of cloryphill being corespondent with the astro-physical star type. And with that the Higgs boson just finds it's location for the right direction in the astro-physical sky. My guess is: There is something like the massive star type, finding the massive DNA replication (without colour; scientific American wants to just say it was "astro-biology" for the Boson, What do I know?).

God is Dead.


#33 Anaximenes

Anaximenes

    Senior Member

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,866 posts

Posted March 22 2014 - 10:06 AM

Now, is the substance of this field correct, people, as to the understanding that life on Earth could be the macro-extension of and from life anywhere?

Huh?!!http://ncse.com/rncs...ve-lifes-origin

What are they saying? This NASA group wants to save environmental science?

#34 Anaximenes

Anaximenes

    Senior Member

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,866 posts

Posted March 26 2014 - 11:20 AM

i suppose what somebody may have had in mind, was communicating with people, who would be new to us, because we haven't met them yet, because they live on worlds too far away to get there from here.

i just think the thread title, is an absurdly ignorant way of putting it.

as if people didn't realize it takes billions of years, after a planet is formed, before life can begin to develop on it.

i don't know, maybe some people are that ignorant. it kind of gives me the creeps to think that anyone actually is.


But the new planet truly forms in the eternal now. We may say there is life for the in specific registered instants, and spans of instants; however no similarity has it's presence for life discovered at one time to another. We don't step in the same stream of evolution twice: like a stream of water.

Personally, judging from the reading of the "Parmenides' of Plato there is no known quantity of originating points for life; what is knowable is aduced from constantly new spatiality for planets. And again the known is about the eternally NOW, planet.

Nevertheless, you've got to give modern science the benefit of knowing that there is only one originating point for Life on each of these planets at investigation. And all planets were originally asteroids.

God is Dead.


#35 ʈuɱɓɭiɳɠ.ƌičɛ

ʈuɱɓɭiɳɠ.ƌičɛ

    Hitchhiker

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,227 posts
  • LocationKentucky, USA

Posted May 03 2016 - 10:49 PM

New planet in the solar system?

 

http://scitechdaily....as-it-produced/


play-craps.jpg