Jump to content


Click to shop at Sensi Seed Company
Photo
- - - - -

What do you think of the US education system?




  • Please log in to reply
71 replies to this topic

#31 Carlfloydfan

Carlfloydfan

    Travel lover

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 7,173 posts
  • LocationS. America somewhere

Posted March 28 2013 - 04:24 AM

It would be more properly called the US indoctrination system.



Agreed.

What do you think of Montessori schools or Walden schools?

1zp476d.gif...
 


#32 Carlfloydfan

Carlfloydfan

    Travel lover

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 7,173 posts
  • LocationS. America somewhere

Posted April 02 2013 - 06:21 PM

It's systematically piss poor. It's fashionable to blame teachers for this, but that's bullshit. Teachers' hands are bound, they have piss poor resources, they have to conform to piss poor requirements/standards, they're forced to spend a ridiculous amount of time dealing with student behavioral issues that should be addressed and corrected at home, but which aren't because we are a nation of babies raising babies - parenting skills are dismal in this country, and those who are capable of being decent parents, don't have the time or resources to do so effectively.

It's a matter of priorities and this nations priorities are insane. Russian and European students are 2-4 years ahead of any U.S. student with regard to education level at any given age by secondary school. I'm not exaggerating when I say that when a "senior" level European exchange student comes to the U.S. they are greeted with "freshman" level coursework in our senior high school level classrooms. I shudder to think about how far ahead the Chinese, Korean and Japanese are. In my junior year at college, I came to know a "junior" physics major from China - we were the same age. He advised the tenured head of the physics department (doctorate) on a regular basis (I witnessed it many times) - in fact, I suspect that my Chinese friend was essentially recruited to the school to aid the physics department with research projects.


I lived in China and worked at a UNI for two years, you are talking out of your ass.

I also visited a (now ex) French gf numerous times during our 3.5 year relationship while she was @ UNI. Again, talking out of your ass, as I got to know the French UNI system very well. I imagine the French to be at the top in education throughout Europe but what you are speaking could not be further from the truth.

1zp476d.gif...
 


#33 Gypsy_Boy

Gypsy_Boy

    Guest

  • New Members
  • Pip
  • 13 posts

Posted April 05 2013 - 01:42 AM

Honestly, I think it's horrible. Still compared to other countries education systems I'm not sure we can complain. Like anything there is definitely room for improvement. I just wish it would focus more on learning your areas of interest and allowing you as an individual to grow. For one, I think kids would pay a lot more attention in school and cause less problems. Plus, how many students graduate and have no clue what they want to do with there life? If they were allowed to explore their interests and have a specliazied education in the area they are best at society could really benefit. For example, if a young kid was interested in science and had a specialized education that allowed him to explore it, who knows what he could accomplish. Though there would be several problems with setting up something of that magnitude and also funding it. So it's not exactly practical. Ok...my rants over.

#34 Sitka

Sitka

    viajera

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,471 posts

Posted April 06 2013 - 12:36 AM

Honestly, I think it's horrible. Still compared to other countries education systems I'm not sure we can complain. Like anything there is definitely room for improvement. I just wish it would focus more on learning your areas of interest and allowing you as an individual to grow. For one, I think kids would pay a lot more attention in school and cause less problems. Plus, how many students graduate and have no clue what they want to do with there life? If they were allowed to explore their interests and have a specliazied education in the area they are best at society could really benefit. For example, if a young kid was interested in science and had a specialized education that allowed him to explore it, who knows what he could accomplish. Though there would be several problems with setting up something of that magnitude and also funding it. So it's not exactly practical. Ok...my rants over.


Like a high school that offers, but doesn't require, Chemistry, Physics, Biology, and Earth Science with AP versions of these classes for high achievers? It seems like what you are suggesting is already done.

3754ee21-519b-4988-a578-3f7f99721e36_zps

"Oh well.  No place has everything that you need." - HM


#35 Zangie

Zangie

    Guest

  • New Members
  • Pip
  • 6 posts

Posted April 08 2013 - 01:04 PM

See how the U.S snuck in the word "education?" The U.S does not educate, they are conditioning us to be "ill-literate."

#36 Irminsul

Irminsul

    Valkyrie

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 15,914 posts
  • LocationBavaria, Deutschland

Posted April 08 2013 - 01:06 PM

I'm sure there is some good schools in the US. Maybe just in rich suburbs.
Red, white, black are our true colours
For these colours we will fight!
Red, white, black will crush the enemy
And will bring back what is right!

#37 Ikibah

Ikibah

    Guest

  • New Members
  • Pip
  • 16 posts

Posted May 01 2013 - 01:23 PM

I'll answer your question with another.....Why the hell does an engineer student need to slave away in a psych course?

#38 redgingergirl

redgingergirl

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 270 posts

Posted May 19 2013 - 02:58 PM

Take a 5th grade test from 50 years ago and see how many kids in 5th grade would pass it now. Hell im sure 8th graders would have problems with it now. What has changed? Our childrens babysitter is television to start. Secondly they have removed basic but important information from the schooling system to be replaced with mindless dribble. Now they are also pushing less physical exertion because it could be potentially dangerous. So cut out the important general knowledge, take away physical exertion, and add in mindless popularity dribble in the media and what do you have? Givin a couple more generations for affects to really begin and you have the start of ideocracy. Regular public schools are left for the poor poeple and only a few expensive schools pass for real schooling. We pay taxes but it doesnt go to schooling unless they are making the school building bigger.

#39 redgingergirl

redgingergirl

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 270 posts

Posted May 19 2013 - 08:41 PM

I think more parents should home school. I also believe that adults should re-educate themselves.

#40 Ikibah

Ikibah

    Guest

  • New Members
  • Pip
  • 16 posts

Posted May 24 2013 - 10:31 AM

No, homeschool kids end up weird. You need the social experience of school.

#41 skitzo child

skitzo child

    PEACEFUL LIBRA

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,480 posts

Posted May 24 2013 - 10:42 AM

Horrible we are behind in the world

#42 Glasshopper

Glasshopper

    Struggling for sanity

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 117 posts
  • LocationWonderland

Posted May 24 2013 - 01:03 PM

"]Charlotte Iserbyt: The Deliberate Dumbing Down of the World - YouTube
There is a crack in everything, that is how the light gets in.
-Leonard Cohen

#43 Mike Suicide

Mike Suicide

    Sweet and Tender Hooligan

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,294 posts

Posted May 24 2013 - 01:22 PM

No, homeschool kids end up weird. You need the social experience of school.


I agree. Plus most teachers have years of experience and specialize in various subject. Most parents are not qualified to teach their children.

religion for people afraid of going to hell.spirituality is for people who have been there.

getting laid is not the same as getting free consensual sex. that actually may be comparable to winning the lottery.

[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Peace Love Unity Respect

#44 MeAgain

MeAgain

    Dazed and Confused

  • Super Moderator
  • PipPipPip
  • 7,701 posts
  • LocationDobbstown, Malaysia

Posted May 24 2013 - 02:17 PM

If you are truly concerned about the U.S. education system, get the book: http://www.amazon.com/Death-Great-American-School-System/dp/0465014917/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1287674809&sr=1-1"]The Death and Life of the Great American School System by Diane Ravitch.

Ravitch was a U.S. Assistant Secretary of Education and originally supported "No Child Left Behind" and charter schools but

later became "disillusioned," and wrote, "I no longer believe that either approach will produce the quantum improvement in American education that we all hope for." In the major national evaluation, 17% of charters got higher scores, 46% were no different, and 37% were significantly worse than public schools, she said. High-stakes testing, "utopian" goals, "draconian" penalties, school closings, privatization, and charter schools didn't work, she concluded. "The best predictor of low academic performance is poverty—not bad teachers."[10]

Ravitch said that the charter school and testing reform movement was started by "right wing think tanks like the Heritage Foundation," for the purpose of destroying public education and teachers' unions.[11] She reviewed the documentary Waiting for Superman, directed by Davis Guggenheim, as "propagandistic" (pro-charter schools and anti-public schools), studded with "myths" and at least one "flatly wrong" claim.[12]

A very good book packed with statistics that back up her claims.

#45 Glasshopper

Glasshopper

    Struggling for sanity

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 117 posts
  • LocationWonderland

Posted May 24 2013 - 05:38 PM

"]Who Controls The Children (schools dumb down kids deliberately) - YouTube
There is a crack in everything, that is how the light gets in.
-Leonard Cohen

#46 redgingergirl

redgingergirl

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 270 posts

Posted May 27 2013 - 07:49 PM

Highly enlightening. I believe the best thing for children now is to be home schooled by their family's that way you can decide what information they receive and how they receive it best for their own mental improvement.

#47 mike bedell

mike bedell

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 522 posts

Posted May 27 2013 - 09:14 PM

i thimk evryone deservs a good edumacation

#48 redgingergirl

redgingergirl

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 270 posts

Posted May 28 2013 - 11:28 AM

lol hahahah

#49 tubahead

tubahead

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 349 posts

Posted May 28 2013 - 12:09 PM

I can tell as a Graduate Assistant for a Freshman level Philosophy course, education in the US is definitely lacking in the reading, writing, and critical thinking department. I would have students who could not put together cogent sentences and got upset when I marked down for lack of original content. I think that a big part of the problem is the U.S's emphasis on the so called "STEM" subjects (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math). In reality thought the emphasis is on the middle two. Science and math are only emphasized in that they are useful for technology and engineering. I heard a quote about the how all this emphasis in science might cure our shortage of scientists, but it will only create a shortage of leaders.

#50 redgingergirl

redgingergirl

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 270 posts

Posted May 28 2013 - 12:24 PM

Interesting perspective it makes alot of sense to me. I'm under the impression the powers that be wish to dumb us down as much as possible so we will be cattle instead of free thinkers. I do find it interesting that in the past there have been many philosophers and scientists as role models for our children. Now its heavyweight champions and nascar drivers that don't offer anything intellectual to the table.

#51 tubahead

tubahead

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 349 posts

Posted May 28 2013 - 12:36 PM

I'm under the impression the powers that be wish to dumb us down as much as possible so we will be cattle instead of free thinkers. I do find it interesting that in the past there have been many philosophers and scientists as role models for our children. Now its heavyweight champions and nascar drivers that don't offer anything intellectual to the table.


You know, I don't really buy into the dumbing down of America thing or that it is a conspiracy. More people are going to college and in fact it is very much encouraged. I would have lots of students who did not need to be in college. It wasn't that they weren't smart enough, most just didn't really care. If you don't care for book learning, I would say college is not a good place to go. Go do something else that you do find interesting. Go be a plumber or an electrician. You will probably be able to find a steady job, it will be fairly well paying to support a family. It is relatively stress free compared to a lot of corporate jobs. There is nothing wrong with doing skilled labor or anything else that you want to do, if you don't find want to go to college. The problem is everybody is told, you have to go to college to do anything. They make it a sort of value judgment so kids go who didn't necessarily need to, and now they have tons of debt. Don't get me wrong, I am all for more education to be a good citizen, but you should learn those things in high school, and leave higher education for those who really have an interest in it.

I am also not sure that philosophers and thinkers were ever that big of role models. It was pretty much always sports stars and celebrities. A lot of the time, only the upper classes would have heard of any philosophers, and they were the ones whose history was recorded. It kind of skews history.

#52 redgingergirl

redgingergirl

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 270 posts

Posted May 28 2013 - 01:32 PM

Well our opinions may differ there but you have to admit that television is a large cause of children feeling less like learning and losing other things in life as well. I do think that if you were to take a 8th grade test from fifty years ago and have 8th graders take the test now none of them would pass because there was more information required to be learned then. There is nothing wrong with hard labor, but whats wrong with a hard working labor man that is intellectual as well. men used to be concerned with things like politics and economy and now that is something only smart men talk about.

#53 tubahead

tubahead

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 349 posts

Posted May 28 2013 - 03:41 PM

There is absolutely nothing wrong with "a hard working labor man that is intellectual as well." I have known many, but they went to college and were interested in attending and participating. The students I was referring to are individuals who had no interest in being at university and were only there because they thought they had to be there.

As far as the tests go, IQ tests scores are actually rising across generations. Fairly significantly. We also have to figure, nobody used to learn calculus in high school. Nobody had advanced chemistry placement. Now those classes are very common. I can remember asking my parent with homework help in Jr. High, and they would always say, "I can't believe they expect you to learn this in Jr. High." Once I got into high school, they couldn't help anymore. My Dad was pretty smart too. He got through medical school.

I am also not really sure that only smart men talk about politics and the economy. I grew up in a very small town where very few people went to college. Many didn't finish high school, but I have had lots of friends that would talk about those kinds of things all the time. I think that is sort of a perception that people have but I don't think it is accurate.

#54 MeAgain

MeAgain

    Dazed and Confused

  • Super Moderator
  • PipPipPip
  • 7,701 posts
  • LocationDobbstown, Malaysia

Posted May 28 2013 - 04:32 PM

I've always liked Alvin Toffler, in this video he explains some of the problems with public ed, but he doesn't offer any soultions....which disapointed me and makes the whole thing kinda moot:

"]Alvin Toffler on Education - YouTube

I'd like to keep a central "meeting ground" for students where the tools and instructors, or mentors, that they need would be available and at the same time inject some level of freedom into the mix.

I believe in a well rounded individual so I would strongly support History, English (critical reading in particular), Art, Music, Phys ed, etc. and at the same time the STEM subjects, as technology/engineering is an excellent way to foster creativity in a problem solving environment that draws on science and math and demands "real world" solutions.

Incidentally, technology would be the use of all tools from hammers to CNC machines, computers are just one technological tool so I am not using the term in its currant popular form.



#55 Pressed Rat

Pressed Rat

    Do you even lift, bruh?

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 32,874 posts

Posted May 28 2013 - 04:38 PM

You know, I don't really buy into the dumbing down of America thing or that it is a conspiracy. More people are going to college and in fact it is very much encouraged. I would have lots of students who did not need to be in college. It wasn't that they weren't smart enough, most just didn't really care. If you don't care for book learning, I would say college is not a good place to go. Go do something else that you do find interesting. Go be a plumber or an electrician. You will probably be able to find a steady job, it will be fairly well paying to support a family. It is relatively stress free compared to a lot of corporate jobs. There is nothing wrong with doing skilled labor or anything else that you want to do, if you don't find want to go to college. The problem is everybody is told, you have to go to college to do anything. They make it a sort of value judgment so kids go who didn't necessarily need to, and now they have tons of debt. Don't get me wrong, I am all for more education to be a good citizen, but you should learn those things in high school, and leave higher education for those who really have an interest in it.

I am also not sure that philosophers and thinkers were ever that big of role models. It was pretty much always sports stars and celebrities. A lot of the time, only the upper classes would have heard of any philosophers, and they were the ones whose history was recorded. It kind of skews history.


People going to college means nothing if the colleges are nothing more than indoctrination centers. The fact more people are going to college simply means more people are being brainwashed to mindlessly serve the system. Colleges are to real education what McDonalds is to real food.

Living is easy with eyes closed
Misunderstanding all you see
It's getting hard to be someone but it all works out
It doesn't matter much to me


#56 tubahead

tubahead

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 349 posts

Posted May 28 2013 - 04:45 PM

I believe in a well rounded individual so I would strongly support History, English (critical reading in particular), Art, Music, Phys ed, etc. and at the same time the STEM subjects, as technology/engineering is an excellent way to foster creativity in a problem solving environment that draws on science and math and demands "real world" solutions.




I definitely agree with that. I think that well rounded is very much the key at younger ages. Once you get into college, you can be a little less rounded in what you learn, but there is still a certain level of roundedness. Don't get me wrong, I am very much in favor of the STEM subjects being taught. They are very important. What I have issue with is them being emphasized to the detriment of the more liberal arts subjects, which I think is happening. Even within the STEM subjects, science is really only seen as a way to support technology. The more theoretical sciences don't get the same kinds of support that the very practical engineering sciences get. At the university I went to, the philosophy department was in a small office that was falling down. The engineering campus was state of the art and very well maintained. I think you are hitting the key with problem solving abilities. That is what is really important.

#57 tubahead

tubahead

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 349 posts

Posted May 28 2013 - 04:58 PM

People going to college means nothing if the colleges are nothing more than indoctrination centers. The fact more people are going to college simply means more people are being brainwashed to mindlessly serve the system. Colleges are to real education what McDonalds is to real food.


We in the philosophy departments love brainwashing people. It really is what gets us off. I make all of my students take an oath of complete obedience to my will. I don't like to teach them things like Argument ad hominem, argument ad authoritatem, ad hoc reasoning, false dichotomies, circular reasoning. I make them take my opinion and all others get fails. I learned all this from my philosophy professors who are exactly the same. Liberal Arts is this way in general. I don't like for my students to the about real issues like good and bad, rights, freedom, life. They don't really need to make any decisions about those anyway.

#58 ~One And ALL~

~One And ALL~

    Bliss

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 6,135 posts

Posted May 28 2013 - 05:01 PM

I will say that the first time I ever watched Brazil was in a first year philosophy course.

I had a cpl really good philosophy professors who truly pushed free thinking and I learned a lot in those courses. I absolutely loved debating theories w one particular prof. (the one who had us watch and analyze diff aspects of Brazil) and I loved taking the essay tests in that course too.

But yea.. .it depends on what classes you're taking, etc.

#59 redgingergirl

redgingergirl

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 270 posts

Posted May 28 2013 - 05:02 PM

We in the philosophy departments love brainwashing people. It really is what gets us off. I make all of my students take an oath of complete obedience to my will. I don't like to teach them things like Argument ad hominem, argument ad authoritatem, ad hoc reasoning, false dichotomies, circular reasoning. I make them take my opinion and all others get fails. I learned all this from my philosophy professors who are exactly the same. Liberal Arts is this way in general. I don't like for my students to the about real issues like good and bad, rights, freedom, life. They don't really need to make any decisions about those anyway.


Well atleast your honest but the way you talk I wouldn't be surprised one bit.

#60 tubahead

tubahead

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 349 posts

Posted May 28 2013 - 05:13 PM

Well atleast your honest but the way you talk I wouldn't be surprised one bit.


Really? Honestly most of the time I don't lecture, I just lead discussions. I like to point out the basics of argument, but really let anybody speak freely about their opinions. I want tolerate any bullying by anyone in the class. As long as they give some good reasons, and can communicate those reasons pretty well, they get good grades. I have had lots of really good essays from students on all sides of any given issue. I am always pulling for them too. I want to learn something from my students and many times they come up with stuff I never would have thought of. I love being able to give credit to a student for coming up with something really interesting. As long as they really show that they have put in some time thinking about an issue, I am very happy. My goal is always that they have no idea what my thought on the matter is. Lots of times I will end up defending the opposite view of what I have to keep things interesting. I always think that the students probably think I am either super conservative or super liberal depending on the discussions.