I've fantasized about killing pedophiles

Discussion in 'True Confessions' started by easygoing, Oct 28, 2011.

  1. autophobe2e

    autophobe2e Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,747
    Likes Received:
    404
    for some, it appears, there is no difference. i for one enjoy this branch of logic where thinking about something is the same as doing it. for example, in the last hour alone i've had sex three times, bought a car and punched an esteemed professor of english literature in the face, all from the comfort of my bedroom.
     
  2. The Imaginary Being

    The Imaginary Being PAIN IN ASS Lifetime Supporter

    Messages:
    11,772
    Likes Received:
    135
    there's a distinction based on activity

    but pray tell

    what do you call a child molester before they...

    you know - molest children??

    furthermore - a pedophile may not touch children

    but what of all those exploited children in pornography

    mr pedophile faps off until his heart is content - he is the consumer

    he is equally to blame.
     
  3. Anglophone

    Anglophone Guest

    Messages:
    4
    Likes Received:
    0
    Let's use your example. Out there now is a paedophile with indecent images of children. What's his crime? It's not being a paedophile. It's possessing indecent images of children.

    Possessing indecent images of children = Illegal.
    Being a paedophile = Not illegal.
     
  4. The Imaginary Being

    The Imaginary Being PAIN IN ASS Lifetime Supporter

    Messages:
    11,772
    Likes Received:
    135
    i not squabbling over the law and it's fine print

    end of the day - the reason we have child porn is because it had a market

    those pedophiles are this market.

    it wouldn't exist without them.

    if that is the case - children wouldn't be abused had they not been ever so harmlessly downloading this illegal content on the internet.

    there's a difference, but both are acting morally indecent.
     
  5. fluffybutt

    fluffybutt Guest

    Messages:
    9
    Likes Received:
    0
    There is a difference between pedophile and child molester. Pedophile is a child lover. They love kids and would never hurt them. I should know. I am one. A child molester is most likely NOT a pedophile and is some sick fuck that likes to torture and hurt kids and should have a rusty metal bar driven through their skull.
     
  6. Tyrsonswood

    Tyrsonswood Senior Moment Lifetime Supporter

    Messages:
    34,218
    Likes Received:
    26,295
    They use those terms interchangeably here... I wouldn't go around claiming you were a pedophile in these parts. It could get you killed or worse.


    Nice thread necro by the way.
     
  7. Sallysmart

    Sallysmart Raynstorm Serenade

    Messages:
    2,337
    Likes Received:
    87
    I have never fantasized about killing anyone but I do kinda wish we could end them somehow, even if it was to drop them all in one big hole with iron gating on top so they can hurt each other in a mode of survival of the fittest. Let them do each other out. Drop biscuits down the hole and let them deal with it and any of their sick ways as well. They should suffer like those victims did.
     
  8. Taboodave

    Taboodave Members

    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    10
     
  9. Taboodave

    Taboodave Members

    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    10
    By definition pedophilia is an attraction to someone who has not yet reached puberty.
    A hebephile is a person who is primarily attracted to adolescents, or children who have at least started puberty and have signs of adult sexual maturation, but are still young and developing both mentally and physically.
    The term and classification has some overlap or even confusion with the term "ephebophilia", which refers to the primary attraction to late- or post-adolescents ages 15-18.
    Many people are quick to use the label pedophile when in fact it may not apply.
     
  10. morrow

    morrow Visitor

    You touch or think sexually of a child, the you should be castrated, and your hands cut off, then sent out in the world,to be punished by the very people you have damaged and hurt, they won't forget, nor will those children's parents! Believe me, those people, are evil, and don't give a shit about the damage they do to children, physical and mentally! The world doesn't need those people!
    Personally I could take the life of a convicted child sex offender, yet could never hurt another living thing...
    You see, abusing children, is nothing more than a sexual preference, but you know it's wrong, but still do it... you wreck children's lives, their health, their future, you know this, but still you do it! Your evil! The world doesn't need you!
     
    1 person likes this.
  11. JPN2

    JPN2 Supporters HipForums Supporter

    Messages:
    2,001
    Likes Received:
    491
    I would consider it a moral duty.
     
  12. OldDude2

    OldDude2 Newbie

    Messages:
    756
    Likes Received:
    203
    16, 17, 18 and 19 year old teens are totally legal in the UK. In Spain 13 is legal, so no teen problems at all there.

    The problem being, you need to define 'child' first, which is usually a geographical definition.

    In Muslim countries, there is often no age of consent as sex outside marriage is punishable by death. You are either married and legally entitled to sex with your spouse (consent is given by marriage, no further discussion), or you abstain from sex at threat of death.



    Sorry, just nitpicking.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice