Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

One poth Meth


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
40 replies to this topic

#1 dr.manijak

dr.manijak

    Member

  • Members
  • 16 posts

Posted January 12 2011 - 06:58 AM

One pot meth recipe is impossible to find on the internet, I looked about 25 pages of Google and I have never found it, every page I opened, as if the American government paid the hacker to remove from all places those pot meth recipe.
Do any of you might have this recipe, since I already stink at this chair looking for a recipe?
:confused:

#2 ScottDK420

ScottDK420

    Banned

  • Banned
  • PipPip
  • 566 posts

Posted January 12 2011 - 07:13 AM

I'm not sure about the one pot method of dope, I too have looked out of curiousity for it also, but have found nothing anywere. Saw some show where this guy had a jug with all this shit mixed in ,but I persoanlly think that it would not work very well purity wise,or quantity wise. I know people that have made dope in one vessel or conatiner by adding pseudoephedrine powder to anhydrous ammonia,with ether in it ,then added lithium strips from AA litium batterys, and then poured the mixutre into a glass jar through about 5 coffee filters, to have a clear meth/ether soultion, then they would "smoke it off" by using a mt.dew 20 Oz. plastic bottle with a hose in it adding sulfuric or hydrochloric acid to non-iodized salt, making vapors like smoke, then squeezing the "smoker bottle" and the tube being just over the top of the glass jars solution and the "smoke" would hit the solution and it would appear to snow in the jar as white meth particles formed and dropped to the bottom of the mixture. the that was filtered and so on..never seen it all done in one container myself tho..

#3 Codmouse

Codmouse

    Senior Member

  • Senior Member
  • 1,902 posts

Posted January 12 2011 - 07:21 AM

You both seem to have little idea about what is actually going on. I am too drunk to explain why.

http://www.erowid.or...stry/index.html

If you find one in that that you like, make sure you understand every word. Ready it 10 times too. There are no easier ways than those.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

(Dronelore)"Living is awesome. Maybe dying is awesome too. But seeing as no one knows for sure, it makes perfect sense to fear the "end" of something as awesome as being alive."


#4 dr.manijak

dr.manijak

    Member

  • Members
  • 16 posts

Posted January 12 2011 - 07:34 AM

You both seem to have little idea about what is actually going on. I am too drunk to explain why.

http://www.erowid.or...stry/index.html

If you find one in that that you like, make sure you understand every word. Ready it 10 times too. There are no easier ways than those.


OK, I looked and there but nothing I have found, I found the standard recipe that can be found everywhere on the Internet.

I suppose that one pot method is so simple that everyone can make it, and that the U.S. government is trying to prevent people from making it because it is supposedly very dangerous.
When I read the real cake recipe 10 times read, and when these things are to make me believe that I will not miss a single comma, and make the thing with which I will work from a distance. :2thumbsup:

#5 ScottDK420

ScottDK420

    Banned

  • Banned
  • PipPip
  • 566 posts

Posted January 12 2011 - 08:59 AM

You both seem to have little idea about what is actually going on. I am too drunk to explain why.

http://www.erowid.or...stry/index.html

If you find one in that that you like, make sure you understand every word. Ready it 10 times too. There are no easier ways than those.


I have a very good idea about meth synth. although this one pot method I have no clue. I have done the Birch method, Red Phos. Hydriotic acid,Ephedrine reduction method, seen P2p synth, etc.. I do not need an online guide to tell me how to sytnh meth. I was taught by people who have done it for 20+ years and actual chemist, with PHD's in chemistry! lol..just becasue I do not know some stupid so called one pot method,and have seen the Birch method done in simple ways does not mean I am unaware of the proper ways in which to synth meth. I have a much better idea of meth synth's in general more than you think!! anyway thanks for your suggested website on the matter, but I have seen all of those sites before and have done much of what you think I know nothing of in the past. lol

#6 Codmouse

Codmouse

    Senior Member

  • Senior Member
  • 1,902 posts

Posted January 12 2011 - 01:20 PM

I have a very good idea about meth synth. although this one pot method I have no clue. I have done the Birch method, Red Phos. Hydriotic acid,Ephedrine reduction method, seen P2p synth, etc.. I do not need an online guide to tell me how to sytnh meth. I was taught by people who have done it for 20+ years and actual chemist, with PHD's in chemistry! lol..just becasue I do not know some stupid so called one pot method,and have seen the Birch method done in simple ways does not mean I am unaware of the proper ways in which to synth meth. I have a much better idea of meth synth's in general more than you think!! anyway thanks for your suggested website on the matter, but I have seen all of those sites before and have done much of what you think I know nothing of in the past. lol


Hm. Don't need to impress me mang. I don't know you, or hardly anyone on this forum well enough to say anything for sure. From what I read it seemed like there was a lack of know how.

Plus, a "one pot" method is obscure. Most of them are "one pot" methods. I would say the red, white, and blue method is "one pot" with iodine, ephedrine, and red phosphorous. But eh

It doesn't get much easier than those two methods.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

(Dronelore)"Living is awesome. Maybe dying is awesome too. But seeing as no one knows for sure, it makes perfect sense to fear the "end" of something as awesome as being alive."


#7 ScottDK420

ScottDK420

    Banned

  • Banned
  • PipPip
  • 566 posts

Posted January 12 2011 - 04:29 PM

Thats true ,although a reaction occurs in a vessel , the product is taken out and put in variuos other containers for filtration and crystalization. One "pot" being a reaction vessel is true for the actual main redution of the epedrine to meth, but futher chemical processes are needed to purify, and crytsalize the meth into a usable form, and is not done in the reaction vessel, making it not truly one pot , I think the actual one pot method is a mixture of all the nastiest bathtub type of dirty meth with lower yields and more dangerous by products and is from what little of the one pot method, a recipe for low grade dirty lower purity meth.

#8 orison319

orison319

    my dog is full of stars

  • Super Moderator
  • 56,021 posts
  • LocationSquirrel Hill Penisylvania

Posted January 12 2011 - 04:45 PM

takes at least 3/4 jugs, jars.. one container. Its absurd. you cant pull Dempty with one jar, what makes anyone thing tossing all the components together will work..

anyone can strip the pills whacks off in one container.... what you bind them with is what kinda meth you get..

theoretically, stripping the wax off of red hots, having pure E-Fed is just as much meth as the meth your going to get by doing no other birch reductions .... you may as well just clean the pills of filler and snort that..

in all seriousness though, you should just make some other RC drugs, 1/2 the products needs are legal in low volumes..


Posted Image

You guard your hopes

you pocket your dreams
You'd trade it all to
avoid an unpleasant scene


#9 RooRshack

RooRshack

    On Sabbatical

  • Senior Member
  • 10,207 posts

Posted January 12 2011 - 04:50 PM

I have a very good idea about meth synth. although this one pot method I have no clue. I have done the Birch method, Red Phos. Hydriotic acid,Ephedrine reduction method, seen P2p synth, etc.. I do not need an online guide to tell me how to sytnh meth. I was taught by people who have done it for 20+ years and actual chemist, with PHD's in chemistry! lol..just becasue I do not know some stupid so called one pot method,and have seen the Birch method done in simple ways does not mean I am unaware of the proper ways in which to synth meth. I have a much better idea of meth synth's in general more than you think!! anyway thanks for your suggested website on the matter, but I have seen all of those sites before and have done much of what you think I know nothing of in the past. lol


You know chemistry PHD's who make/made meth?

What fucking idiots, and what a waste of years of cheimstry know-how.

RIP cosmoknot.

 

http://www.hipforums...line=1278715660

 

 

 

Missing at ocala: A true feminist, rumored to be traveling with bigfoot and a man of impeccable scottish credentials.


#10 orison319

orison319

    my dog is full of stars

  • Super Moderator
  • 56,021 posts
  • LocationSquirrel Hill Penisylvania

Posted January 12 2011 - 04:56 PM

lulz..


Posted Image

You guard your hopes

you pocket your dreams
You'd trade it all to
avoid an unpleasant scene


#11 Codmouse

Codmouse

    Senior Member

  • Senior Member
  • 1,902 posts

Posted January 13 2011 - 02:44 PM

You know chemistry PHD's who make/made meth?

What fucking idiots, and what a waste of years of cheimstry know-how.


Haha, this is what I was thinking. If I have a PHD, I wouldn't make any drugs... I would prob not use drugs at all (to much to lose). If you have a PHD, you are not going to use the low yield dirty methods described above.

But, I am sure there is someone out their with a PHD that does that... :(
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

(Dronelore)"Living is awesome. Maybe dying is awesome too. But seeing as no one knows for sure, it makes perfect sense to fear the "end" of something as awesome as being alive."


#12 RooRshack

RooRshack

    On Sabbatical

  • Senior Member
  • 10,207 posts

Posted January 13 2011 - 04:55 PM

Haha, this is what I was thinking. If I have a PHD, I wouldn't make any drugs... I would prob not use drugs at all (to much to lose). If you have a PHD, you are not going to use the low yield dirty methods described above.

But, I am sure there is someone out their with a PHD that does that... :(


I think if I had a PHD, I'd start at the beginning of PiHKAL and work strait through to the end of TiHKAL :p

RIP cosmoknot.

 

http://www.hipforums...line=1278715660

 

 

 

Missing at ocala: A true feminist, rumored to be traveling with bigfoot and a man of impeccable scottish credentials.


#13 dr.manijak

dr.manijak

    Member

  • Members
  • 16 posts

Posted January 14 2011 - 08:15 AM

Hm. Don't need to impress me mang. I don't know you, or hardly anyone on this forum well enough to say anything for sure. From what I read it seemed like there was a lack of know how.

Plus, a "one pot" method is obscure. Most of them are "one pot" methods. I would say the red, white, and blue method is "one pot" with iodine, ephedrine, and red phosphorous. But eh

It doesn't get much easier than those two methods.



Ok I understand, I found a recipe for the red white blue method, but I have one question, when it says that is injected iodine, whether it's iodine in the crystal, or liquid iodine, which is used for the injury?

#14 Codmouse

Codmouse

    Senior Member

  • Senior Member
  • 1,902 posts

Posted January 14 2011 - 01:41 PM

Crystals. You get them by mixing hydrogen peroxide, hcl (muriatic acid, a cap full), and iodine in its strongest concentration. Put it in the fridge for a night and wake up to some sparkly crystals. use a coffee filter to get them, then smash the coffee filter to remove the xcess liquid.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

(Dronelore)"Living is awesome. Maybe dying is awesome too. But seeing as no one knows for sure, it makes perfect sense to fear the "end" of something as awesome as being alive."


#15 Codmouse

Codmouse

    Senior Member

  • Senior Member
  • 1,902 posts

Posted January 14 2011 - 02:45 PM

┌∩┐ (◕_◕) ┌∩┐
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

(Dronelore)"Living is awesome. Maybe dying is awesome too. But seeing as no one knows for sure, it makes perfect sense to fear the "end" of something as awesome as being alive."


#16 orison319

orison319

    my dog is full of stars

  • Super Moderator
  • 56,021 posts
  • LocationSquirrel Hill Penisylvania

Posted January 14 2011 - 03:22 PM

┌∩┐ (◕_◕) ┌∩┐

thats what happens when you make meth.^ it Kills Roy..


Posted Image

You guard your hopes

you pocket your dreams
You'd trade it all to
avoid an unpleasant scene


#17 ScottDK420

ScottDK420

    Banned

  • Banned
  • PipPip
  • 566 posts

Posted January 15 2011 - 07:04 AM

The PHD's in Chemistry made meth a few times, mainly to show a few other people how to do it properly, otherwise they were into DMT, MDA, and some LSD Synths.. lol..and the birch methos actual has lower weight yields but produces meth as pure as 95% or higher, I know this becasue a person I know cooked some meth about 12 years ago using the birch method and a dude got busted with an 8-Ball and the police sent it off to the state crime lab for analysis and it came back at 96% pure. I persoanlly have never seen any one pot meth, as I think it does not work all in one container, there is no way IMO to do a complete synth. in a single container, you will just have a bunch of unreduced psudo or some ephedrine analogue ,but not methamphetamine..lol.. I think it's probably a bunch of idiots getting some "placebo" effect from it..Chemistry cannot be altered by some bullshit one pot theory of synth. Chemsitry is a constant and what you put into a reaction is what you get out of it to put it simply= Garbage in, Garbage out..to borrow the old computer terms...lol

#18 ScottDK420

ScottDK420

    Banned

  • Banned
  • PipPip
  • 566 posts

Posted January 15 2011 - 07:07 AM

I think if I had a PHD, I'd start at the beginning of PiHKAL and work strait through to the end of TiHKAL :p


For sure, I would do the same I think, certainly not fuck with meth. Although there is a huge amount of money that a proper chemist can make in a weekend making a lotta meth for some people. I would be making LSD, MDA,MDMA, etc.. lol..fuck the speed, I would be tripping on some rare psychedelic of Shuglin's book,,,lol...Most defintely I would be using some trip drug and would not be typing, I would be somewhere with walls melting and all that....lol..

#19 ScottDK420

ScottDK420

    Banned

  • Banned
  • PipPip
  • 566 posts

Posted January 15 2011 - 07:09 AM

Ok I understand, I found a recipe for the red white blue method, but I have one question, when it says that is injected iodine, whether it's iodine in the crystal, or liquid iodine, which is used for the injury?


Or somehow obtain hydriotic acid, but Iodine crystals will acheive the same end that hydriotic acid will. just more work to do..

#20 sylphid

sylphid

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 50 posts

Posted January 15 2011 - 11:50 AM

yeah I know quite a few post grads and phds who make meth.

Drug chemistry is *easy*, it doesn't take specialist knowledge - the skill isn't in the chemistry, it doesn't matter whether you got a phd in industrial chemistry on top of post grads in pharmacology design, or a well read 17 year old bright lad, the problem is getting the precursors without getting caught. After that it's basic lab skills to form a series of reactions until you finally produce the drug.

phikal isn't a cookbook and the methods are out of date, those precursors aren't available any more for ecological and legal reasons.

I doubt anyone new is making LSD, the investment into the lab is huge, 'cid is cheap to buy from the families and terribly expensive to make on a small scale. The last guy was 8 years back

The yields you hear discussed are bullshit. Ephe to meth is about as simple a conversion as exists, regardless of which split you take, the yield and purity is going to be high if you have half a brain.

One pot real and really is as easy as you hear, the only people saying otherwise have got motive for saying so. If you don;t like guys taking meth, get into harm reduction and stop lying about chemistry. You throw it all in a bottle, then wait. Vent into a balloon to avoid fumes - what could be easier? Remember, it's after all the reactions have happened that you bubble to produce actual meth, anyone claiming poor yields is doing something wrong that could be corrected in 2 minutes talking to someone in the know. If you're unhappy with your product after the synth, that's normal for any method to any drug, at the end wash it. We wash every other product, if your bottle cook isn't washing his crystals it's not his method which is flawed, just laziness.

#21 RooRshack

RooRshack

    On Sabbatical

  • Senior Member
  • 10,207 posts

Posted January 15 2011 - 12:03 PM

yeah I know quite a few post grads and phds who make meth.

Drug chemistry is *easy*, it doesn't take specialist knowledge - the skill isn't in the chemistry, it doesn't matter whether you got a phd in industrial chemistry on top of post grads in pharmacology design, or a well read 17 year old bright lad, the problem is getting the precursors without getting caught. After that it's basic lab skills to form a series of reactions until you finally produce the drug.

phikal isn't a cookbook and the methods are out of date, those precursors aren't available any more for ecological and legal reasons.

I doubt anyone new is making LSD, the investment into the lab is huge, 'cid is cheap to buy from the families and terribly expensive to make on a small scale. The last guy was 8 years back

The yields you hear discussed are bullshit. Ephe to meth is about as simple a conversion as exists, regardless of which split you take, the yield and purity is going to be high if you have half a brain.

One pot real and really is as easy as you hear, the only people saying otherwise have got motive for saying so. If you don;t like guys taking meth, get into harm reduction and stop lying about chemistry. You throw it all in a bottle, then wait. Vent into a balloon to avoid fumes - what could be easier? Remember, it's after all the reactions have happened that you bubble to produce actual meth, anyone claiming poor yields is doing something wrong that could be corrected in 2 minutes talking to someone in the know. If you're unhappy with your product after the synth, that's normal for any method to any drug, at the end wash it. We wash every other product, if your bottle cook isn't washing his crystals it's not his method which is flawed, just laziness.


foooooollll..... I mean, sure, 1pot meth works, I've seen recepies that looked totally legit, in that the end product should contain small amounts of inefficently made methamphetamine. And maybe you could even smoke it a few times before dieing of all sorts of acute toxicity.

Also, you DO need to be a PHD to have a legit lab and access to the precursers for the drugs in question.... or to go inventing new ones or to make a host of other fun ones...

RIP cosmoknot.

 

http://www.hipforums...line=1278715660

 

 

 

Missing at ocala: A true feminist, rumored to be traveling with bigfoot and a man of impeccable scottish credentials.


#22 sylphid

sylphid

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 50 posts

Posted January 16 2011 - 02:34 PM

Getting my phd meant writing a paper, not learning how to make illegal drugs, the only thing I was able to do afterwards was hand build peptides for 150 times the cost as buying them from china, big deal. You don't get magic access to precursors, they are purchased or manufactures. Your lab is in use, you don't get access to an unobserved lab - where did you study for yours?

Everything comes out impure - the wash cleans it. Yeild is always high with meth if you know what yr doing as alteration so simple.

If you want to learn how to make drugs and willing to listen, one pot has huge advantage over RW+B, you remove the need for the AA, remove the fumes, contain the solvent, and prevents air from causing any issues if you do it right, sounds to me like you once looked at the very wrong youtube clip circulating which shoes a string of dangerous practices that can be entirely avoided. Or watching news reports that you don't understand.

What did you last synth? Talking about "recipes"? You're not baking a cake, you don't sound like anyone who has done anything but googled meth and pretending to be an expert, just checked some of yr posts, you don't seem to any chemistry whatsoever.

One pot has been used for 50+ years perfectly safely all over the world, one news network gets hold of it, a few police call it dangerous, and a few thousand internet warriors think they're experts and propagate the police lie.

If I'm wrong and you do know your stuff, not just copy and pasting bullshit, how exactly do you thnk the product is being contaminated by one-pot - please explain to me the stage and impurity it introduces, we can discuss it and I'll show you how to improve your synth. No matter how you make any drug you should be washing the final product to remove the impurities and catalysts - didn't you learn this in lab?

#23 sylphid

sylphid

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 50 posts

Posted January 16 2011 - 02:38 PM

oh, just seen your age. Forget it, enjoy reading about shit on google. Don't attempt any drug synthesis until you've been shown how to use chemicals safely, the ones used in any meth synth are dangerous.

#24 certainful

certainful

    Member

  • Members
  • 18 posts

Posted January 16 2011 - 03:05 PM

OK, I looked and there but nothing I have found, I found the standard recipe that can be found everywhere on the Internet.

I suppose that one pot method is so simple that everyone can make it, and that the U.S. government is trying to prevent people from making it because it is supposedly very dangerous.
When I read the real cake recipe 10 times read, and when these things are to make me believe that I will not miss a single comma, and make the thing with which I will work from a distance. :2thumbsup:


the standard recipe is a one pot recipe. you put sudo+hi+rp or sudo+i2+P into one flask or pot and wallah! you're cooking

#25 Codmouse

Codmouse

    Senior Member

  • Senior Member
  • 1,902 posts

Posted January 16 2011 - 03:24 PM

For sure, I would do the same I think, certainly not fuck with meth. Although there is a huge amount of money that a proper chemist can make in a weekend making a lotta meth for some people. I would be making LSD, MDA,MDMA, etc.. lol..fuck the speed, I would be tripping on some rare psychedelic of Shuglin's book,,,lol...Most defintely I would be using some trip drug and would not be typing, I would be somewhere with walls melting and all that....lol..


I don't get why people hate meth so much when MDMA and MDA are very closely related to meth... It is a phenethylamine just like MDA and MDMA. The effects are even very similar. Lovey, talkative, love to listen to people talk, feel happy, etc..

It has to be because there are people that go over the top with meth and that you can use meth for 3 days way easier than MDMA. Look at someone who doesn't eat or sleep much in their lives without meth, and you will see the same type of bodies and psycho thinking.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

(Dronelore)"Living is awesome. Maybe dying is awesome too. But seeing as no one knows for sure, it makes perfect sense to fear the "end" of something as awesome as being alive."


#26 orison319

orison319

    my dog is full of stars

  • Super Moderator
  • 56,021 posts
  • LocationSquirrel Hill Penisylvania

Posted January 16 2011 - 03:27 PM

so,, what your saying is, sleep deprived people are psychotic..


Awesome.. :D


Posted Image

You guard your hopes

you pocket your dreams
You'd trade it all to
avoid an unpleasant scene


#27 certainful

certainful

    Member

  • Members
  • 18 posts

Posted January 16 2011 - 03:40 PM

i think it's because it doesn't make you stupid like the downers do, infact it has the opposite effect and it's been so readily available in the US for a long time and the only way to combat it is through mass propaganda and people believe what they're told to believe... the powers that be use to say that pot is addictive and will turn you into a sex pervert.

#28 RooRshack

RooRshack

    On Sabbatical

  • Senior Member
  • 10,207 posts

Posted January 16 2011 - 04:01 PM

I don't get why people hate meth so much when MDMA and MDA are very closely related to meth... It is a phenethylamine just like MDA and MDMA. The effects are even very similar. Lovey, talkative, love to listen to people talk, feel happy, etc..

It has to be because there are people that go over the top with meth and that you can use meth for 3 days way easier than MDMA. Look at someone who doesn't eat or sleep much in their lives without meth, and you will see the same type of bodies and psycho thinking.


Strong amphetamines basically burn out your brain, in excess.

You don't go on a 2 week MDMA binge, it's classifiable as a psychedelic, there are just a few people in recorded drug history with MDMA addictions, you don't crave it in the same manner. Meth has no psychedelic properties (Imagine methamphetamine psychotherapy.... yeahhhh...) but DOES cause multi-week sleepless binges full of violence and insanity. And the difficulties in making MDMA and getting precursers GENERALLY will mean that labs are run by more responsible people, instead of the generic meth cooks who turn their labs and the surrounding woods/playgrounds/anywhere else they can dump their shit into fucking superfund cleanup sites.

Mr. PHD, no the PHD doesn't mean you know all that shit, it means you've had a chance to study it, and if psychedelic chemistry is the direction you choose to go, you can do that, and then it gives you a chance to get a job in the field, in proximity to those chemicals, for example with one of the universities doing studies on psychedelics... like mine.... There are legitimate jobs that put you in a position to do that, if it's what you love doing.

As for me and synths, I've never done SHIT, because of the fact that I can't get precursers or equipment, and that the fact that I do plan to study chemistry a LOT more before that kind of thing. I'm quite confident that I could make methamphetamine, but I have no interest in this.

RIP cosmoknot.

 

http://www.hipforums...line=1278715660

 

 

 

Missing at ocala: A true feminist, rumored to be traveling with bigfoot and a man of impeccable scottish credentials.


#29 Codmouse

Codmouse

    Senior Member

  • Senior Member
  • 1,902 posts

Posted January 16 2011 - 06:37 PM

so,, what your saying is, sleep deprived people are psychotic..


Awesome.. :D


Lol, it does make hallucinations, destroys neurons, stunts growth and the healing process, and weakens memory!

Strong amphetamines basically burn out your brain, in excess.

You don't go on a 2 week MDMA binge, it's classifiable as a psychedelic, there are just a few people in recorded drug history with MDMA addictions, you don't crave it in the same manner. Meth has no psychedelic properties (Imagine methamphetamine psychotherapy.... yeahhhh...) but DOES cause multi-week sleepless binges full of violence and insanity. And the difficulties in making MDMA and getting precursers GENERALLY will mean that labs are run by more responsible people, instead of the generic meth cooks who turn their labs and the surrounding woods/playgrounds/anywhere else they can dump their shit into fucking superfund cleanup sites.


MDMA isn't considered a psychedelic by anyone that I know. Its about as psychedelic as alcohol. It is classified as an entactogen stimulant as far as I know. And I would agree with what I have read about it. Plus, none of this matter because it is chemically very much like meth

MDMA
Posted Image
Meth
Posted Image

There literally is only a few drugs closer to meth than MDMA.

Meth making violence is just what the person choses to do. Meth is easy to get on the street where dumb people with no life or brain can get strung out on it. MDMA is too expensive for the violent stupid people to get ahold of usually (hyperbolic, I know :p ). I think that most people feel much worse the day after 2 rolls than do people after 10 hours of speeding. That includes me. Oh, and I never got violent.

I do agree that MDMA will usually be more pure though, because you need more experience and precursors. But if you find meth in crystal form, its no less pure than molly.

P.S. MDMA = MethyleneDioxyMethAmphetamine
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

(Dronelore)"Living is awesome. Maybe dying is awesome too. But seeing as no one knows for sure, it makes perfect sense to fear the "end" of something as awesome as being alive."


#30 sylphid

sylphid

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 50 posts

Posted January 17 2011 - 05:24 AM

Strong amphetamines basically burn out your brain, in excess.


teach you that in high school watching a video in class? You have a promising career ahead it seems with such insight.

Mr. PHD, no the PHD doesn't mean you know all that shit, it means you've had a chance to study it, and if psychedelic chemistry is the direction you choose to go, you can do that, and then it gives you a chance to get a job in the field, in proximity to those chemicals, for example with one of the universities doing studies on psychedelics... like mine.... There are legitimate jobs that put you in a position to do that, if it's what you love doing.


It's 'Doctor' thanks, you have no idea what you are talking about, precursors are watched and audited by employers who are licensed to use them, that's not how it works, seems google failed you again. Try reading my post again, you'll see that I say having the qualification made no difference to my ability to manufacture. Manufacture is easy, it doesn't take specialist knowledge, just basic but sound chem.

As for me and synths, I've never done SHIT, because of the fact that I can't get precursers or equipment, and that the fact that I do plan to study chemistry a LOT more before that kind of thing. I'm quite confident that I could make methamphetamine, but I have no interest in this.


So basically, you admit you're just a keyboard warrior with no knowledge or experience, but still claim that you could make meth, yet are unable to identify a single point of impurity introduction to back out your bullshit claims - you're just quoting from public news stories. High post count means you talk too much, not that you know more. Why do you comment on something you admit to having no experience in?

One pot still contains similar reactions to other methods, they're simply done dynamically, not statically, and under containment that can be controlled through encapsulated venting. if you get the numbers right on the way in, the reactions happen exactly the same. It's a superior clandestine method as it avoids all of the aspects which would get people caught. If people choose to do it unethically, that's not a chem issue, it's an environmental one. If people choose to abuse it, it's a social or personal issue.

Stop scarmongering you arrogant little scrote, people want to learn and the people who actually know can help them improve their knowledge and stay safe. You've got nothing to add in terms of knowledge or experience, so why bother taking the time to put your stamp on the thread? The simple truth is that one pot methods have been used for decades, the reason you are only hearing about them recently is that the guys using them were never caught until the recent surge of guys sing it after someone released it on a public notice board rather than the private discussion groups being used before, and people who don't know the facts are having a go, and getting partial results. As it's out, the best thing to be done is to be honest about how to make it safer for people.