So I've been researching it for a while, and the idea of foreskin restoration is beginning to appeal to me. It basically involves some sort of device applying constant tension on the foreskin, encouraging skin growth/expansion. It shares the same principal as those weird earlobe rings people have that widen the hole. Based on what results you desire, foreskin restoration takes anywhere from 1-3 years if you're deeply committed, longer if you're not. This is a way for curcumsized males to partially restore themselves to "nearly natural." It doesn't replace the nerves and blood supply that is removed during curcumcision, but it does protect the glans which in turn restores sensitivity. Foreskin Restoration is a proven method, with varying results based on the technique chosen. I'm going to try the T-Tape method, which, based on feedback, is the fastest method. What do you think? Here's some more info.
If you want a taste (not literally!) of what forekin restoration can bring you, try this. It involves the "O-Ring" method, which involves using a silicone ring to hold the remaining foreskin forwards over the glans, providing temporary protection. Use the ring for a week or two, and you WILL notice dramatic improvements!!!
Its big big deal for those who lost it it with out threy'r consent. its a big deal when it dont perform like mother nature inteded it too.
why would you want it back. Its easier to get bacteria trapped. It looks disgusting. I don't know many girls that actually enjoy looking at a uncircumsized penis.
No! No thats garbage it isnt a big deal at all. It not worth spending money and doing that stretching thing anyways that seems so stupid to me. such a waste of effort over something so trivial ps i still have my foreskin if that matters
Why are there people like you who will never understand?! If we were intended to be withouth foreskin, we WOULDN'T BE BORN WITH IT!!!
You obviously don't appreciate your foreskin enough. It is a big deal to people who feel they've lost something. AND IT DOESN'T COST THAT MUCH!!! Some methods only require around $10 of supplies.
Heero, I say fuck them all and go for it. If that is an option that sounds good to you, then why shouldn't you? I obviously can't understand what you are feeling, but I can sympathise. Completely disregard what the critics have to say (unless they've had the procedure done) and especially if they are against it and still have their foreskin.... Do what you want. If it makes you happy, I don't see a reason why you shouldn't do it.
It's probably good that you think like that, then you won't feel so bad about having been involuntarily mutilated yourself. Don't you realize if males were supposed to be like that (have no foreskin), they would have been born like that? You really live a very small world, don't you?
Yeah, I haven't seen many organs in my life that I didn't like. And the few that I have disliked, happened to be cut. I don't think that women generally care. What you think, is a product of the American culture advertising circumcision as the "normal" way.
fuk circumcision. i hate the phrase "sometimes your parents prefer it that way" in those damn christianity sex ed viedeos i used to endure
I could say the same thing for a Vagina but im sure your not rushing your girl friend or little sister to the chamber of horror circumcision chamber.
well it would at least keep the gland "head" protected from the elements and rubbing against underwears etc. but the damage done is irreversible nerves wise thats why it was consider a cure for masturbation along with other quackery "it sure did not help the masturbator" .
considering you are a Swiss were circumcision is even outlaw your not making much sense or your prob some dumb redneck in Alabama trying to pass as Swiss.
Is sex really that much better with a foreskin? If so, I'm fucked. Because mine is gone. And I have heard a LOT of chicks say they do NOT like uncirumsized dicks, so I really think this is a matter of opinion.