Perhaps no with polution, overcrowding, disease and other problems it is best to cull the herd. I mean let the weaker pass on. If your poor then perhaps you need to fall into place and hold your own if not then be allowed to perish. If you can find a job then one shall be assigned to you, if you refuse to work then be outcast. Woah, sorry there, had a this nightmare that Ross Perot got elected for president somehow. Better get myself some warm milk and listen to something soft.
Hey, the man is a great innovator. Look how he spraypainted the grass at corporate HQ with green paint during a dry spell. Ross 'caligula' Perot A true genius Bet he could solve so many of the problems facing the world Cause he is always right. And who would argue with that? Not him. And when he becomes president. No one will ever argue with him again...EVER
"Culling the herd" is something that those ruling the world want more than anything. It's no laughing matter, especially when they talk openly about it in their documents.
vertically challenged rodent Agree...But only the culling of 2/3's of the poor people.. They are needed as a 'threat' Also agree with comment about 9/11 Have seen many of the vid clips/pics of the pentagon strike. That looks a lot like an unarmed sram* to occam [speed height and penetration] The pics of hole in wall show hole smaller than width of even the fuselage of the plane that they say hit it. but fit a sram A 757 would have demolished entire wing of building The bigger the lie, the more readly it will be believed [A.Hitler] Occam *SRAM Short Range Attack Missle.. [look up agm-131 SRAM II in wikipedia] Designed to deliver thermonukes from B1/B2 bombers at very high speed. SRAM2 is easy to deny.. it was made.. but not deployed.. and they only needed say 3 [two for testing] Occam suggests this as they are so fast that sound follows behind. Perfect for a set up. Cruise missles are too slow and people would see them track in to target Maveric to small, LGB's come in a 30 to 45 degree angle which wont look right after impact without a warhead And that pic of small hole on inside wall of building Looks just right for a lump of twisted steel that is all that remains of missle after it punches through all those walls with intitial speed of 2000kmh + while comming in on a horizontal trajectory. [A thing a 757 could not do unless th pilot had 10 thousand flying hours under his belt.] Why does occam say 'unarmed' or 'without a warhead' C'mon...pentagon dont want to 'really hurt itself' And srams were not designed to carry convential munitions. which was a big mistake. A good lie looks much better if the victim is injured. Also they want it to 'work first time..no error' So Hwarhead replaced with visual guidance. Some guy flew it in with a joystick
PS Occam asks. How many heads of important corporations wer in the trade towers when it happened? Do u know?