The Law of Attraction

Does anybody know about this shift in consciousness, emotion and vibration?

For years, my dad and his wife have mentioned the Law of Attraction. And I've always willingly listened, mostly because I like learning about, well, anything!
But recently they've been bringing it up quite frequently.
And then they had me listen to The Vortex. A recording of a live gathering hosted by Esther Hicks.
In this recording she is channeling Abraham, and together they explain the Law of Attraction in a very understandable and enlightening way.
Has anybody heard of this method of manifestation, and if so, what do you think about the whole thing?
I found it to be fascinating, and am going to start changing the way I look at everything! It was the push I needed into leading a completely positive, and relieving lifestyle.
Let me know your thoughts.

 

sounds a lot damn better than The Secret

 

id like to read about it or listen about it...any links?

 

http://www.abraham-hicks.com/lawofattractionsource/index.php
Go to videos, and then to The Vortex ones.
Not sure how good they are, I didn't actually watch those. haha
But there ya go!

 

The first minute or so of "I'm in the Vortex" is kinda weird.
haha.
Keep watching because it gets very good. The next one to go with it is "Whatever you ask for is giveN"
i'm sure you could figure this out, but you know. haha

 

I think there is a balance between the unfolding universe and your positive energy output. You may have control over your own personal outcome (which can also be from self discipline and motivation), but I doubt there is very much control of other people's outcome, as well as life changing events that take place in your life. You can not stop the yin and yang, but instead use the balance to journey as you really dream.

 

... connected in Descartes' universe with the worldly presence of the the science of Architecture. Stars do not attract or repel each other whereas the perception of spatiality in human construction does.

Take galaxies: one would think that the stars rotate around each other due to attraction and repulsion; NOT; the stars just synchronize their presence for nothing and dychronize in advance of each other; the buildings in the modeled developing city sit in their places passively planned for ordinary actions of the city dweller.

 

Bodies form from the accretion of intent.

 

And that would include the Vortex-body which is interpretably what Rene Descartes subscribed to. A vortex-body occupies some spatial extension like a corporeal mechanical one. A vortex is more than Nothing, or nothing is less than a vortex. I'm confused.

 

More of a net. Neural and otherwise.

 

I don't know./////

 

I don't know. I'm just not going to answer that embodiement for words topic right now.

 

That is equal to Time. Our think our brains should change day after day. It proves space for Coming-out-Self. No such luck for what at least Descartes worked out. Perhaps the empirical Berkeley.

Yes, yes, yes: something spatially relative can effect the spatially configured
quantifying for the places of cause and effect.

 

You seem happy today.

 

But answer me about Bishop Berkeley. He was the one that out the mind together by idealistic sensuality of the relatively opposite qualities the science measured by physically knowing How the Objects react.

If I shut you up in room is the key or lock a physical object?

 

Yes, but the object does not object.

 

Fcucken' crazy, all of that: the beings coming at you when the mind is wondering for thoughts that count to mankind (or you think).

 

I think they all fill the role we assign them.

 

Thedope; you've been pushing people as things, and things as people for some time for the matter of Explanation of the Phenomenal Event. And for some time you've also been restraining yourself from the freedom against the spaceless humanity of self-controling counter-existential experience.


This seems reminiscent of the psychoanalysis of B.F. Skinner in the sixties for the development of behaviorism. Is this your attempt at deliberate provocativeness?

 

I think I seem to remind you of other people and other things, but I think it is because you see hints of where you have been, yet something just doesn't square with existing category. These are the places you haven't been.