U.s. Post Office $100 Billion In Debt And Unfunded Liabilities

Discussion in 'Random Thoughts' started by egger, Aug 19, 2014.

  1. egger

    egger Member

    Messages:
    34,040
    Likes Received:
    35,599
  2. TheGhost

    TheGhost Auuhhhhmm ...

    Messages:
    4,487
    Likes Received:
    649
    Never seen a state run mail service that really made profit.
     
    1 person likes this.
  3. AceK

    AceK Scientia Potentia Est

    Messages:
    7,824
    Likes Received:
    958
    why does everything have to be for such profit?

    other than that, the USPS provides great service for low rates, and I almost always use USPS shipping when possible
     
  4. KevinH

    KevinH Just Floating Here

    Messages:
    1,077
    Likes Received:
    2
    Republicans want The US Post Office to be privatized.

    They've been killing it for years.
     
  5. TheGhost

    TheGhost Auuhhhhmm ...

    Messages:
    4,487
    Likes Received:
    649
    Because it's better than loosing money.

    But that's ok .... it's your tax money, not mine.
     
  6. themnax

    themnax Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,694
    Likes Received:
    4,467
    because "conservatives" robb by underfunding, from everything they can, to support their idiotic, greed persuing, wars.
    (and any other way the can get away with, lining their own pockets, at everyone else's expense)
     
  7. RooRshack

    RooRshack On Sabbatical

    Messages:
    11,036
    Likes Received:
    548
    So pay it off.

    Just like universities, roads, jails, and the like, mail needs to be a public service, run at any loss necessary to give a good quality service, for the proper functioning of the country and proper service of the people.

    When you start outsourcing and privatizing things, nothing is off-limits, and government loses it's legitimacy.
     
    2 people like this.
  8. themnax

    themnax Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,694
    Likes Received:
    4,467
    thank you and precisely. "austerity" (which is really welfare to rich corporations who don't need it) nullifies the whatever legitimacy there is, to the whole idea of the existence of governments of any kind.
     
  9. TheGhost

    TheGhost Auuhhhhmm ...

    Messages:
    4,487
    Likes Received:
    649
    Blanket statement without much use. If the money's not there it's not there.




    Why run at any loss necessary? To ruin the state? Sorry, but that makes no sense whatsoever.

    Then again, it's not my tax money paying for that shit.




    If you want to keep something off-limits just do so .... shouldn't be all that hard.

    I wonder how legit a government is that defaults on it's debt.
     
  10. IamnotaMan

    IamnotaMan I am Thor. On sabba-tickle. Still available via us

    Messages:
    6,494
    Likes Received:
    37
    By the same reasoning, are they gonna shut down the armed forces. Given that its managed to score a 2 trillion dollar loss in recent times.

    Maybe they'll also cut back funding of the hypersonic near space global strike Deathstar, that probably sucks up a few zillion more. But only exists on paper.

    I wonder if America will do wha Britain did on the postal service. Sell it off underpriced, sack half the staff, then give a shit service, and see that the govt's backers get a nice cheque for the whole selloff.

    Its amazing how these politicians think you can put on a "private sector" hat (presumably complete with matching cape and underpants on the outside!) and automatically make some activity absolutely brilliantly efficient and quality.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice